|
|
| |
Topic: Sununu: Democrats won election by turning out voters who are dependent on government |
Sununu: Democrats won election by turning out voters who are dependent on government
Concord Monitor [NH], by Ben Leubsdorf
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Pluperfect, 12/6/2012 4:53:26 AM
|
| President Obama and the Democrats won last month’s election because they were able to turn out voters who are dependent on the government, former New Hampshire governor and Mitt Romney adviser John H. Sununu said last night. “They aggressively got out the base of their base, the base of their base that’s dependent, to a great extent economically, on government policy and government programs,” Sununu said during a forum with two other Republican former governors, Steve Merrill and Craig Benson, at Concord’s Grappone Conference Center. For example, Sununu said, Democrats ran up big majorities in some parts of Cleveland
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
66Strat, 12/6/2012 5:23:38 AM (No. 9050964)
Sununu speaks absolute truth. But he forgot that part of the turnout model also included massive fraud - just to make sure votes were counted for all those who intended to vote Democrat, but just could not get to the polls for various reasons such as being dead.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
pineledger, 12/6/2012 5:27:39 AM (No. 9050969)
Several times.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
mabeldog, 12/6/2012 5:30:41 AM (No. 9050973)
Massive fraud also included transporting bus loads of people from states that didn´t matter to the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections to vote early where they "lived" for 12 hours. No ID required!!
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
paleoconserv43, 12/6/2012 6:02:25 AM (No. 9050994)
OK but how do we explain Obama winning in places like Iowa and New Hampshire. Those states aren´t known to have large enclaves of government dependent minorities. This past election baffles me to no end.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Fiesta del sol, 12/6/2012 6:09:59 AM (No. 9051004)
#4, how many Iowa farmers are dependent on government subsidizing corn/ethanol? The government turns even the most typical hard working Americans into welfare voters.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Sunhan65, 12/6/2012 6:14:23 AM (No. 9051008)
I find it strange that none of the key figures in the Romney Campaign claim that electoral fraud was a consequential factor in his loss. So when Romney supporters on this site make these claims, they are saying that Mitt Romney and his team are deliberately conspiring to conceal a massive illegal usurpation of political power by fraudulent means. Or they are saying that Team Romney was too stupid or weak to know that the election was stolen and do anything about it. I suspect Romney, Sununu, and the rest actually do understand the truth about what happened--we lost--and are now more interested in understanding why.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 12/6/2012 6:35:23 AM (No. 9051028)
Sununu has said something which, while true, Ryan is running away from as fast as he can.
I have previously asked posters who advocate that Romney dispute the election results to tell me what the first step would be to do so, as well as how evidence could be found. So far, no bright ideas.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Kitty Myers, 12/6/2012 6:38:18 AM (No. 9051030)
#6 The Republican Party made an agreement 30 years ago with the Democrat Party NOT to ensure voting integrity and NOT to pursue suspected vote fraud.
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Mazeman, 12/6/2012 6:41:31 AM (No. 9051033)
Sununu is correct, and many of the liberals I´ve argued with understand this.
But the REAL problem is that they don´t see it as a problem. It´s hard to argue with someone who WANTS government as their nanny. The much harder thing now is to educate people on why this is a bad thing.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
gam, 12/6/2012 6:45:11 AM (No. 9051034)
Our election fraud would cause even Hugo Chavez to blush.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
3XALADY, 12/6/2012 7:16:06 AM (No. 9051074)
Re the case of the RNC having been found guilty of voter fraud, it´s a laughing matter that the REPUBLICANS were found guilty when it´s been the other side doing it since old man Kennedy bought the election for his son, John. And I wondered why nothing had been done about getting that decision overturned. Here´s the rest of the story from fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com: Since 1982, that Consent Decree has been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, now 88 years old. Long retired, Debevoise comes back yearly for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year. (cont.)
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
3XALADY, 12/6/2012 7:17:06 AM (No. 9051076)
(cont.) In 2010, the RNC unsuccessfully appealed “to vacate or modify” the Consent Decree in “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615 (C.A. 3, Mar. 8, 2012).
This is a summary of the appeals judge’s ruling, filed on March 8, 2012:
In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The RNC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying, in part, the RNC’s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Consent Decree. Although the District Court declined to vacate the Decree, it did make modifications to the Decree. The RNC argues that the District Court abused its discretion by modifying the Decree as it did and by declining to vacate the Decree. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.
Surprise! The judge who denied the RNC’s appeal to “vacate” the 1982 Consent Decree is an Obama appointee, Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Would you believe Judge Greenaway, Jr. is an AF-AM!
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
cobieone, 12/6/2012 7:22:46 AM (No. 9051078)
Big fan of Sununu, but I think this is terribly misguided. He is correct, the dem base is a bunch of dependent on nanny state radicals. But... the reason we lost this election is CONSERVATIVES STAYED HOME. Romney should have received millions more votes than McCain in ´08, but that didn´t happen. Worry about the dependent class all you want, and that is a legitimate concern, but I am way more concerned about conservatives staying home in protest because they didn´t get the perfect candidate, whatever that means. Sorry guys, but this disaster is on them!
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
bpl40, 12/6/2012 7:27:05 AM (No. 9051088)
White males had a calamitous fifteen point drop from´08. Who are these people and why did they stay away inspite of the criticality of the election? Why wasn´t Romney able to persuade them? Thats where the answer and the guideline for the future lies.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
uno_thatguy, 12/6/2012 7:30:54 AM (No. 9051095)
Cuyahoga county:
16 Precincts: Romney 0 votes 125 Precincts: Romney less than 4 votes Many surrounding and in close proximity precincts Romney won. Allen West´s district: 7 registered voters 900 ballots in one precinct. He picked up 132 votes in a 36 hour early voting block, then the Supervisor of Elections slammed the hatch and confirmed the vote, realizing West would win.
Even Mubarak was upset when he learned that his fraudsters who registered too many votes in his favor made the fraud too obvious.
Someone needs to ply the streets asking questions. (probably too dangerous) Maybe a radio host could ask for anonymous verification of Romney votes. Same in 59 Philly precincts; Romney 0 votes.
And there´s a question about whether there was fraud?
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
JAN, 12/6/2012 7:42:16 AM (No. 9051121)
Despite the massive unemployment and the massive government give aways, O received less votes this time than in 2008.
It´s no secret by now that the election was stolen.
Add to that the millions and millions of dollars spent making sure that Voter I.D. was deemed ´racist´.
Dem bought judges went along with this despicable lie and overturned it´s use in the battleground states.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
OhMy, 12/6/2012 7:42:57 AM (No. 9051122)
If the GOP won´t challenge the vote fraud and they are too timid to make the case for conservatism then it is time for a new party! Why should patriots support loosers and keep on loosing to a traitor like Obama?
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
uno_thatguy, 12/6/2012 7:48:25 AM (No. 9051130)
Pardon me: Not Mubarak, but Mursi was concerned about too many votes by his fraudsters.
And there are huge questions about the millions who stayed home. There are indications that millions of Romney votes may have been flipped or spiked, a simple script introduced into the machines that count the ballots. Many of those machines are maintained by unions.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
cobieone, 12/6/2012 7:52:25 AM (No. 9051136)
#16, exactly why Romney should have won this thing big. Zero received millions less votes than in ´08. All we had to do was unite and vote, but we didn´t. Romney barely bested McCain´s totals. Romney´s a RINO, the GOP shoving another moderate down our throats, Mormon religion, many other excuses.
Conservatives failed and are to blame.
I believe there was massive voter fraud in OH, PA, and FL, but this election shouldn´t have been close. If conservatives united behind Romney, we would have won and saved this nation.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
ROLFnader, 12/6/2012 8:00:13 AM (No. 9051146)
I think we knew all along that our side needed to have a massive turnout in order to overcome what we know about the fraud that is the democrat machine. This year was an exceptional case of that due to early voting, high tech and hijinks. We didn´t do that but I still contend that had a recount been ordered in places like Ohio, Florida, etc , a different result may have obtained. If the ´victory´ had been overturned we would be seeing the total devastation of every blue or light blue city in this country as the Takers sought , as Obama stated, ´revenge´. I just don´t think the Romney team would risk that tactic- in the same way that Nixon didn´t want to ´ tear apart the country´ in 1960.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Arby, 12/6/2012 8:02:37 AM (No. 9051150)
It´s the one day when they get off their butts and do something--voting for someone who will enable them to get back on their butts until the next election.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 12/6/2012 8:04:08 AM (No. 9051152)
“Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!” – Sir Walter Scott, having in mind the election held exactly one month ago today, November 6, 2012, when he uttered those astonishingly prophetic words.
Who knew?
Wouldn’t it be interesting and instructive, that is to say enlightening, what a full-blown investigation would reveal?
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
LZK, 12/6/2012 8:06:53 AM (No. 9051156)
This election was "strange"....
Yes -- fraud contributed to the win -- but -- something else happened....
I´m not sure -- yet -- what it was.....
LZK
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Kate318, 12/6/2012 8:08:38 AM (No. 9051158)
Until the vote fraud issue is seriously addressed, Republicans will not be winning elections. And, all this talk about voter turn out and messaging is as pointless as not being able to discuss the real reasons racism and poverty still exist.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
BarryNo, 12/6/2012 8:16:25 AM (No. 9051171)
And I will state again that without the massive fraud, Obama would have lost. There was more fraud this election than ever before. I remember when the media made much of a single small town in a very red area where Bush got nearly all the vote. They muttered darkly of voter suppression and fraud, and did it reflect on the election at large.
But when dozens of high population precincts in multiple swing states show up this election cycle with 100 percent of the votes going for Obama, or more people voting than are registered, the Press sees nothing.
Not that I´m surprised. But I am surprised that so little is made of this in the alternative media and Conservative Talk Radio.
This is not a time to hunker down, unless you are preparing to be utterly trampled.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Donna M, 12/6/2012 8:17:55 AM (No. 9051175)
Like any plane crash, this election crash was a concatenation of events, not just one. The Top Ten are right here:
1) Blatant vote fraud not ruled against by bought-and-paid for Dem judges. 2) Overall better turnout by Dems, even to the graveyard vote. 3) Religious stupidity. Evangelicals stayed home because of prejudice against Mormons. We fail to acknowledge that in the West, a lot of people don´t like Mormons because they are very successful and a little insular. Catholics went left. 4) The Romney campaign never effectively went after the Hispanic vote. They never got their key people (Rubio etc) on the road and high profile. 5) Romney needed to visit factories, farms, mines and Sandy disaster sites with private charities, and less huge rallies. 6) White males stayed home in droves 7) Never pounded on Benghazi and the coverup 8) This made a huge difference--singles either stayed home or voted for Obama because the Republican campaign, in overemphasizing families and marriage--and not appealing to our natural independence, hard work and frustration at this economy--made singles like me sometimes feel like second class citizens. (I´m older and don´t vote my feelings, but most people do.) 8) Romney campaign never roadblocked the media with purchased time to get his message out straight to the public around the media=soft left. Tons of money but lack of smart media strategy! 9) We never successfully painted Obama as a LOSER 10) ORCA was probably sabotaged by Indian or Russian programmers
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 12/6/2012 8:23:13 AM (No. 9051192)
Remove the parasite vote and Romney won. Romney should have been president. Rabble should not be electing presidents ever. Obama is an aberration. The working taxpaying citizens of America are enraged and very ticked off. Democrats will pay dearly for what they have done. They will be butchered at the 2014 elections.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Grampy, 12/6/2012 8:37:03 AM (No. 9051215)
Some say there is "no evidence" of fraud. Without a million voters proving their vote was changed or deleted, exactly how do you prove fraud with empirical evidence? Sometimes circumstantial and/or anecdotal evidence is compelling enough, like the precincts mentioned before in Philly and Cleveland. Exactly right #17, if the GOP isn´t going to challenge it, we need a party that will. Voter ID is only a good start.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
mindyourbubble, 12/6/2012 8:50:10 AM (No. 9051233)
#27 I agree with you...but. The Dems will repeat their methods in 2014 because of it´s success in 2012. The thing that frightens me the most is, BHO is going to pack the Supreme court, and if their methods of getting votes at the poles works, they will regain the House as well as increase their members in the senate. For then Dems it will be like shooting fish in a barrel. Sununu just talks and whines as do other RNC honchos.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
dolphin, 12/6/2012 9:00:52 AM (No. 9051251)
We lost because we were the target of a government sponsored cultural revolution. And I don´t think Chairman O is finished with us yet.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Swo, 12/6/2012 9:04:24 AM (No. 9051263)
The Obama campaign machine played MoneyPol.
Assuming y´all have seen the movie Moneyball (a good flick), The Oakland A´s went all geek, and targeted only those things that would get players on base or across the plate.
The Obama campaign targeted only those people in selected states who would get them the elections. They discovered what really matters, and tended to buck the conventional wisdom about elections.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Avogadra, 12/6/2012 9:41:58 AM (No. 9051345)
Remember how the administration threatened Gallup when its poll numbers started showing Obama would lose? Why would it do that? Because it owns stock in Gallup? Or because a huge theft of votes would become obvious if the most accurate polling agencies predicted a result far different from the actual result?
Electronic vote theft can´t be traced. All evidence of it can be self-erased shortly after the deed is done. It will happen again in 2014 unless We-the-People come up with some sort of strategy to stop it. (It´s quite obvious that elite Republicans like John Boehner are quite content with their role as pretend opponents of the Democrats. They have no motivation to fix vote fixing.) Can we go back to paper ballots, filled out by hand? Do our computer wizards know of any way that common folk can expose the complicity of Spanish companies in stealing elections with electronic voting machines?
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 12/6/2012 9:52:18 AM (No. 9051367)
Ryan was off-putting to many swing voters, too edgy, too high strung. The water gulping and obsessive throat-clearing in the debate made him seem weird.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
OhMy, 12/6/2012 9:57:03 AM (No. 9051377)
Electronic vote fraud can easily be countered by having the voting machines print a paper record which the voter must check on the spot and which must be retained by law in case of a recount or if verification is needed such as one candidate getting every vote! The beauty of this approach is that the Rats were howling about voter fraud and calling for it the every time the GOP won at least since Bush vs Gore. How can they object if we all approve of this measure?
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Sully, 12/6/2012 10:00:29 AM (No. 9051388)
Sununu: I predict a solid win for Romney.
I´ve had it with Sununu. The man who gave us Souter and then gave us false information on election 2012.
Jumped the Shark:
Sununu Limbaugh Dick Grimer Wormtongue Morris Hannity Basically anyone who told us to disbelieve the polls (all of which were right) and to believe them instead (all of whom were wrong)
When the Republicans give over to sophistry and the denial of reality, well, what are they good for?
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
nolibgal, 12/6/2012 10:02:40 AM (No. 9051393)
I don´t know any voters that stayed home this time. I do know voters that stayed home in 08. Totally anecdotal-yes. But there was NO voter apathy with the people I talked to. It just doesn´t add up! literally! It also makes me feel like the whole integrity of our voting system is pirated and useless. I no longer believe that my vote counts anymore.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Aria, 12/6/2012 10:12:22 AM (No. 9051422)
I didn´t know about the consent decree until this election and can´t imagine why the GOP hasn´t figured a way around this including disbanding the entity subject to the decree and starting an alternate party that passes the test of not being liable for the GOP´s legal entanglements.
The other thing I wonder is - why were they so stupid to ever agree to this? It guaranteed their sideshow status and the transformation of this country. Obviously someone cared more about their own butt than the much bigger picture.
And lastly - the GOP is in trouble for voter fraud? When the rats do it right in front of us and no one can do a damned thing about it????? I don´t believe nothing can be done - it´s just that no one has bothered and now we´ve got a full blown crisis.
I´m looking for another country.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
gpau, 12/6/2012 10:16:58 AM (No. 9051428)
Here is what happened: "Master Plan to Steal an Election" at www.brushfires-of-freedom.com/steal-an-election.html
So simple and timeless: just like Stalin said, it doesn´t matter who votes, it matters who counts the votes.
You want ideas of what to do? Demand release of the source code in the vote tabulating computers in every swing state. Go to Governor Kasich, or Florida´s Governor and pressure them to investigate.
They won´t do anything, unless the demand reaches a certain mass. But there IS a critical mass of Americans that KNOWS this election was a fraud; they just don´t know how it was pulled off. The building blocks are as plain as day in "Master Plan to Steal an Election". Axelrod´s use of Holder and the DOJ to threaten Gallup is the step that gave away the game.
Spread the word. Let´s see what happens--
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 12/6/2012 10:19:42 AM (No. 9051434)
I understand the sentiments of #36, but don´t blame those listed for the outcome of the election. What was happening "on the ground", with the huge crowds Romney garnered, did NOT jive with the outcome of the election. In fact, I don´t think that even 0bama thought he was going to win. This is a red country. Don´t think I´m right? Take a look at the article at American Thinker today entitled "Who elected Obama?"
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
congaree53, 12/6/2012 10:19:57 AM (No. 9051436)
I´m with #36. The only good thing about the election result is that it put an end to the ´skewed polls´ nonsense.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
OhMy, 12/6/2012 10:20:37 AM (No. 9051438)
How could the GOP agree to this one sided consent degree in the first place and how could it be still in effect 30 years later? The GOP is engaging in a charade to pretend we have elections. Why didn´t Obama get 98% of the vote just like Saddam Hussein used to in Iraq. The only reason for that is to keep up appearances!
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
msjena, 12/6/2012 10:28:37 AM (No. 9051460)
The polls were wrong--only not in the way people thought. The polls showed Romney winning Florida, Virginia and Colorado, and too close to call races in Ohio and Iowa. They even showed Wisconsin in play. So the commentators were not wrong to think that Romney would win, since the undecided vote typically goes to the challenger. The pollsters need to rethink what they are doing, because the old methods just don´t work in the age of cell phones and early voting.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
M2, 12/6/2012 10:43:10 AM (No. 9051511)
So, doesn´t that make Romney right about the "47%"? Where´s the apology?
Also, no one can convince me that voting-machine tampering and other fraudulent methods were not used to steal this election. That is really the serious part of the Obama win.
We must get a handle on disallowing certain people from voting; specifically those who are not qualified, not registered, have no photo ID, are not domiciled, or are utterly ignorant about America´s founding and her Constitution.
We have been far too lax with both our immigration laws and our voting laws. Time to tighten them up so that never again will another election be stolen by fraud.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
dragonlearner, 12/6/2012 10:45:05 AM (No. 9051518)
It´s time to learn from mistakes and look towards the next election. If Republicans cannot convince Obama voters that their plans are better than Democrat plans, then we´re finished. Take a look at Detroit and Philadelphia. If those examples of Democrat rule are not convincing enough, then it´s time to throw in the towel and move out of the country.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 12/6/2012 11:07:41 AM (No. 9051583)
Sununu lies through his teeth
The election was stolen. Period.
If you believe otherwise you´re running around with your skirt over your head refusing to stare the truth in the face
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
smcchk, 12/6/2012 11:08:59 AM (No. 9051591)
Everyone that I know knew the stakes of this election and were desperate for Romney to win. The GOP has to start claiming voter fraud! We will never win any elections until we know how inner city precincts come in 100% for the Democrat. As for states such as New Hampshire, baffling.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
OdinsAcolyte, 12/6/2012 11:30:11 AM (No. 9051666)
I knew this. Socialism waxes in America. I want to escape to Belize.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
bighambone, 12/6/2012 12:03:56 PM (No. 9051801)
However they did it, the liberal Democrats have come up with a winning election strategy. Everything points to a lot more people becoming dependent on government welfare based benefits and services before the next election.
There is no doubt that motor voter registration, instant voter registration, liberal absentee ballot and early voting, procedures, all contrary to common sense, that the liberal Democrats have been pushing for seemingly forever are only benefiting the liberal Democrats and have no impact on most Republican voter numbers, making it much easier for registration and voter fraud to be perpetrated, especially since voters do not have to present any sort of ID in a lot of places.
When you look back on how a lot of those liberalized voter procedures got passed into law, you will see that the wimpy Republicans went along with the liberal Democrats to get along when a lot of those liberal procedures were passed.
The liberal Democrats have a particularly effective tactic when dealing with the Stupid Party anytime that decide to further liberalize voting procedures that they know will get them more votes, they simply threaten to use the race card and call out any opposing wimpy Republicans as being racists. That always gets enough Republicans in line so that the liberal Democrats can get what they want done.
Then on top of all that in the last election there were so many narrow minded conservatives who refused to vote for a Mormon that Romney never had a chance. Those are the people who are going to find out that they shot themselves in the foot.
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
rc1776, 12/6/2012 12:04:09 PM (No. 9051802)
Sir, You forgot the dead, illegal aliens, missing, invented, and computer fraud. The only way the dimfecals can win is through criminal theft and intimidation. Sure the lobbyist, imprisioned and otherwise felons, welfare class, the "stuff" idiots, and the wealthy foodstamp busniess types( Solandra~ GM ~ Chrysler) and corporate farmers enthuisaticaally grovel to the dimfecals, but they are a small number compared to the illegal aliens who criminally
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
3XALADY, 12/6/2012 1:43:16 PM (No. 9052028)
Amen #37. Every conservative I know was aware of the importance of this election and I don´t think wild horses or NBP´s w/sticks could have stopped them from voting for Romney. Not our particular favorite choice, but certainly better than Chairman O.
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
NotaBene, 12/6/2012 2:00:42 PM (No. 9052067)
Democrats turned young Americans into beggars for gifts.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
ScrIbelus, 12/6/2012 2:10:55 PM (No. 9052085)
Mencken had it right: "some people work for a living; More people vote for a living."
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
rocco49, 12/6/2012 2:11:48 PM (No. 9052087)
We wuz robbed...not by much, just enough for the Alinsky-taught Soros-loving thug union crooks on the left to "fix" the fraudulent election in "My Muslim Faith" Hussein the Won´s favor. And I want something DONE about it! Like the fiscal cliff negogiations, like Benghazi, Libya, like....oh never mind!
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
nevernaught, 12/6/2012 2:30:34 PM (No. 9052113)
Hey I found a newspaper article about Obama voters:
http://www.mandatory.com/2012/06/05/the-funniest-newspaper-fails/#photo=44
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
grandpa, 12/6/2012 2:41:39 PM (No. 9052140)
You guys didn´t believe me when I was telling you all last year in posts here that it was the abortion issue that was going to be the primary Republican vote killer.
Many otherwise Republican voters were persuaded by the extremely effective Democrat ads showing Romney announcing that he would overturn Roe v Wade and abolish Planned Parenthood. That told those voters that under Republican rule, their wives and knocked-up daughters would be forced to continue unwanted pregnancies and the husbands would be forced to pay for those unwanted children. Where´s the federalism in that?
Add to that the Republicans´ obsessively protecting the low tax rates of Wall Street zillionaires who profiteered in destroying homeowners´ equity in the housing market and artificially maintaining high gas prices.
It ain´t a BF mystery: The Republicans insanely hung on to two big loser issues-- and LOST! Which they will do again and again until Republican leadership wakes up to reality.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
starboard, 12/6/2012 4:54:45 PM (No. 9052340)
Obama has the voter fraud blue print patented and ready to pass on to the next Democrat candidate. I read somewhere Bill Clinton was helping Obama in Ohio in order to get some of this information.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
leopardtwo, 12/6/2012 6:14:25 PM (No. 9052445)
47 percent! 47 percent! 47 percent! So, there Nancy Pelousy!
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 12/6/2012 7:54:01 PM (No. 9052614)
I´ll be dipped...a revelation from Sununu. The dims helped the gummint-dependent sheep get off their behinds to vote for Obie. There´s something wrong here that not enough of the rest of us bothered to vote Obie out of a job (by the way, I did).
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
Kate3513, 12/6/2012 9:19:14 PM (No. 9052745)
This afternoon one of my staff intercepted a recorded message stating in so many words, " we are calling you to enlist your help. There are millions of Republicans who are trying to take your medical care from you. We need you to donate $200.00 toward the cause so that we can help you hold on to your healthcare". She tried to get a human on the phone so that she could enlighten that person that they had called into a medical office full of Republicans! Of course no human came on the line. My first thought was that it was a scam using the Dems to get money out of people by scaring them but after some thought I think it is coming from the same thugs that brought fraud into every nook and cranny of the voting process in this country on Nov 6. They have figured out how to use the phone and the Internet to scare people, 47 % who receive some form of entitlement from Washington. Until Republicans and Conservatives are ready to man the phones and the Internet and do likewise we will never beat these thighs. Time to play hardball!
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
Kate3513, 12/6/2012 9:21:11 PM (No. 9052750)
Thugs!
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
ChicagoWilson, 12/6/2012 9:35:04 PM (No. 9052774)
Sunnunu speaks the obvious. The obverse is that Romney failed to turn out his base.
Another point to consider is that the state party won the Wisconsin recall vote but the national party lost there. I say, clean house and find the sharks who know how to win door to door.
|
Reply 62 - Posted by:
Mmdemimonde, 12/7/2012 6:18:04 PM (No. 9054334)
I witnesses what appeared to be fraud when I was poll watching and had hoped someone would contact me after I tried to call the campaign office. Sununu is correct, this election was won because people did not want to give up or have reduced any benefits from the gov´t. People would ask me questions about romney´s policies on federal programs and how they would impact on their needs......I tried to be truthful and told them to do research. They did, and they voted their interests....Obama. I´m still reeling from this election. I don´t think I´ll ever get involved in an election again.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
|
Nothing Is Being Done To Prevent America From Becoming ‘Bladerunner With Food Stamps’
|
|
American Enterprise, by James Pethokoukis
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/23/2013 5:55:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Walter Russell Mead outlines two possible futures for middle-class Americans: one where most of us lose “the race against the machine,”the other where smart government policies enable an eventual successful transition to an economy where IT and robots do a shockingly large percentage of the jobs humans do today — but the carbon-based life forms still have plenty of meaningful work to do. Mead calls that first scenario, “Bladerunner with food stamps.” Mead: It’s likely that an information age welfare state would consist of two components: straight out welfare and “social inclusion” payments for some,
|
|
Government Gone Wild
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Daniel Henninger
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/23/2013 5:51:08 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Of all the excuses, explanations and alibis pouring forth in the saga of the IRS kneecapping of conservative groups during the victorious Obama 2012 campaign, the one that deserves attention is this from David Axelrod: "Part of being president is that there´s so much beneath you that you can´t know, because the government is so vast." This makes the federal government sound like the endless void in "Star Trek"—a place "where no man has gone before." Under Mr. Axelrod´s Spock-like logic, the federal government has become a Milky Way of incomprehensibility, and so it follows that the IRS scandal could have originated
|
Yes, America Says: America Drones the American People
|
|
Atlantic, by Elspeth Reeve
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/23/2013 5:36:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. government admitted for the first time Wednesday that it intentionally droned American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen in 2011, and that it unintentionally droned three other Americans, including al-Awlaki´s 16-year-old son. Attorney General Eric Holder admitted it in a letter to Congress, The New York Times´ Charlie Savage reports. The letter comes the day before President Obama gives a speech at the National Defense University that will justify the drone strikes carried out since he took office, plus "review our detention policy and efforts to close the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay;
|
CIA Honored Benghazi Chief in Secret Ceremony
|
|
Daily Beast, by Eli Lake
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 6:28:18 AM
Post Reply
|
|
At a secret February ceremony at CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., the chief of the CIA’s base in Benghazi the night of the 9/11 anniversary attacks there was awarded one of the agency’s highest intelligence medals, according to U.S. military and intelligence officials.The honor given behind closed doors to “Bob,” the officer who was in charge of the Benghazi intelligence annex and CIA base that was attacked in the early morning of September 12, 2012 and then abandoned for nearly three weeks, illustrates the murky lines of command that preceded the attack, and helped make it a politically volatile issue.
|
Congress likely to reduce food stamp funding in new farm bill
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Susan Ferrechio
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 5:53:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Senate on Monday opened debate on a $955 billion farm bill that would reduce federal spending by as much as $23 billion over the next 10 years by cutting funding for food stamps and eliminating some farm-support programs. "This legislation will create jobs, cut taxpayer subsidies and reduce the deficit," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday. The White House offered only conditional support for the bill, an indication that lawmakers will need to make changes to win the president´s signature. The Obama administration in April called for a 3 percent reduction in the nation´s crop insurance program,
|
The Most Chilling Details From The Kafkaesque Search Warrant That Went After A Fox News Reporter
|
|
Business Insider, by Grace Wyler
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 5:43:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Journalists are understandably alarmed by the revelation that President Barack Obama´s Justice Department targeted Fox News reporter James Rosen during a leak investigation of a State Department employee. The news, reported by the Washington Post late Sunday night, reveals that the Obama administration will apparently stop at nothing to track down whistle-blowers who leak classified information. In Rosen´s case, that included implicating him as a "criminal co-conspirator" whose actions were punishable with up to 10 years in prison. While it is not uncommon for the government to investigate leaks, it is unprecedented for a journalist
|
How the Obama Administration Talks to Black America
|
|
Atlantic, by Ta-Nehisi Coates
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 5:25:05 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The first lady went to Bowie State and addressed the graduating class. Her speech was a mix of black history and a salute to the graduates. (Snip) It takes a man of particular vision to know, as Obama did, that the country really was ready to send an African American to the White House. But I also think that some day historians will pore over his many speeches to black audiences. They will see a president who sought to hold black people accountable for their communities, but was disdainful of those who looked at him and sought the same.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Criminality Appears To Lie at the Heart of the IRS Scandal
|
|
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.
|
Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner lost her rights
|
|
Politico, by Rachel Bade
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”
|
All of Obama´s Scandals Are Ultimately About Information Control
|
|
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|