A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Plan to Raise Estate
Tax Divides Democrats
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Plan to Raise Estate
Tax Divides Democrats

Wall Street Journal, by Siobhan Hughes

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 12/1/2012 5:47:24 AM

Sen. Mary Landrieu and President Barack Obama can link arms on many pieces of the White House´s proposed budget package, including raising taxes on higher-income Americans and spending more on infrastructure. But Ms. Landrieu, along with a notable handful of Democratic colleagues, parts ways with the White House on one increasingly thorny issue: the president´s call to raise the estate tax as part of Washington´s bid to strike a deficit-cutting deal before year´s end. "This particular tax is inherently unfair," Ms. Landrieu said, adding that she would oppose any year-end

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: shamus, 12/1/2012 5:50:29 AM     (No. 9042501)

What´s wrong with Democrats these days? They used to like any and all tax increases.


Reply 2 - Posted by: hoosierblue, 12/1/2012 6:02:07 AM     (No. 9042507)

It seems that communism is coming back to bite the communists.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Spidey, 12/1/2012 6:11:00 AM     (No. 9042509)

What people are missing is Obama keeps adding poison pills to this deal which make them impossible for republicans to agree with. Now he wants $255 billion in more stimulus and he´s also working on something to soften the blow to rich people he claims to hate. The point is he wants the fiscal cliff to happen to devastate the military and other tax brackets will endure big increases.

Obama´s real distribution is from the white middle class to rich and poor liberals,period.The whole motivation behind all this is the left thinks the middle class has had it too good. They´re not intent on raising the lower classes up but bring everybody else down to their level while the ruling class elites are awash in money.

Landrieu is up for reelection and I suspect there´s a lot of family farmers in La. who especially hate the death tax.When family farms have to sell them to pay the death tax,they are bought up by farming conglomerates who then reap free money from ethanol subsidies.


Reply 4 - Posted by: LAW428, 12/1/2012 6:11:30 AM     (No. 9042510)

A Washington representative´s first loyalty should be to the Constitution and what enhances the freedom of the American people. This is a no brainer, but increasingly Americans find themselves at odds with their government. It didn´t start out this way.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Country Boy, 12/1/2012 6:17:26 AM     (No. 9042513)

"The proposal—which would raise $276 billion over 10 years, according to the Tax Policy Center"

This is beyond stupid. The entire objection to the tax is that most heirs don´t have the money to pay the tax, so they have to sell the assets. The increased tax will never be collected !! Plus, after sale, many of the assets which are producing income will produce less, further damaging the economy.


Reply 6 - Posted by: voxpopuli, 12/1/2012 8:12:47 AM     (No. 9042608)

sorry @2..
apparently it depends on your lawyers..
MN Gov. Mark Dayton and his three brothers share a SOUTH DAKOTA administered trust.. of FIVE BILLION DOLLARS..


Reply 7 - Posted by: Anner40, 12/1/2012 9:12:48 AM     (No. 9042705)

Oh oh...starting to affect their bank accts..


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: zephyrgirl, 12/1/2012 9:36:07 AM     (No. 9042771)

They´ll cave. Dems always do. If Dingy Harry doesn´t need their votes, he may cut them some slack and allow them to vote against it.


Reply 9 - Posted by: veritas, 12/1/2012 10:36:57 AM     (No. 9042912)

Politics maybe the only field where one can become rich doing the wrong thing, for the wrong reasons, in the wrong way.

Facts, logic, rationality -- all out the window, all kicked aside in favor of power-seeking by the pols.

1. Only legitimate purpose of Federal taxation is to fund the few legitimate areas of authority delegated to the Feds under the Constitution. Therefore taxes should be broad-based and simple.
2. Though often called "social engineering" in the past, and "fairness" today, the better term is "influence peddling."
3. I have read that is actually costs more to administer and collect the estate tax than it brings in. That´s not hard to believe. At best, the revenue raised is small; the tax certainly hits only a small number of people and families, though it hits them harshly; and the property taxed has already been taxed several times in most cases.
4. "Fairness" is utterly unacceptable as a test or measure of the propriety of a tax or other law. "Fairness" is wholly subjective; is impossible to define with any consistency; and can be made to fit [or disguise?] just about any agenda.
5. Any tax rate above, say, ten percent should immediately be eyed with suspicion. [Aren´t the reasons obvious?]


Reply 10 - Posted by: bighambone, 12/1/2012 10:42:19 AM     (No. 9042929)

Right now there is a farmland bubble that family farmers have no control over in many states. While their farmland is now valued at over one million, in most other ways they are just regular people who work for and earn a living off that land that usually has been in the family for generations.

If the one million, 55% tax rate, comes into affect in January, when an owner dies, the family will never be able to come up with enough money to pay off the 55% tax. So the farmland will have to be sold, and most times it will be purchased by farming corporations, some actually owned by foreign interests, with the farm families now living on that land loosing their longtime source of income. At least up until now, that has never been the American way.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Trigger2, 12/2/2012 6:30:21 AM     (No. 9044015)

Demonrats have huge ill gotten estates. No wonder they oppose the goobermint taking it all.



Post Reply   Close thread 713957




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s nurses admit
it’s hard not to call him ‘hon’
Washington Times, by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 11:08:16 AM     Post Reply
Nurses treating Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev say their natural inclination toward compassion makes it difficult to see the 19-year-old as a possible terrorist. And they have to make concerted effort — and buddy-system pacts — to keep from referring to him with terms of endearment such as “hon.” One 29-year-old nurse said on Gawker: “When you’re in the room, it’s just a patient. You’re here to … make sure they’re feeling better. When you step away, you take it in. I am compassionate, that’s what we do. But should I be? The rest of the world hates him right now.”

Fox News Reporter May Face Criminal
Charges for Reporting on the CIA
Atlantic, by Philip Bump    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 11:03:53 AM     Post Reply
The government will use any and all information at its disposal to find journalist sources, as shown in The Washington Post´s report this morning on a Department of Justice investigation into Fox News chief correspondent James Rosen, who may face criminal charges for reporting government secrets. In June 2009, Rosen reported on CIA analysis suggesting that North Korea might respond to new UN sanctions with renewed nuclear tests. In order to determine how Rosen learned of the analysis, which had been issued by the CIA only a few hours prior, FBI investigators used every tool at their disposal: analyzing

It’s.The.Law
American Spectator, by Ross Kaminsky    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 6:17:17 AM     Post Reply
Last Thursday, Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) started a Twitter prairie fire with his call for people to describe #ObamacareInThreeWords. (My contribution was “Sorry, Doctor retired.”) (Snip) The White House, never shy to jump into social media, responded with a flurry of tweets, including “It’s. The. Law.” which smacked, more than anything, of typical Obama chest-thumping. Is the administration sure they want to aggressively take credit for a law which, for almost the entire three years since its passage, has had more Americans supporting its repeal than supporting the law itself and which, according to Rasmussen Reports

Tooth and Nail: Fluoride
Fight Cracks Portland´s Left
Wall Street Journal, by Joel Millman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:57:35 AM     Post Reply
PORTLAND, Ore.—In the 1950s, after health authorities began fluoridating U.S. water supplies, they faced opposition from groups like the John Birch Society, which called it "an unconstitutional mass medication of the public." Sixty years later, the fight over fluoridation has erupted in Portland, where the battle has drawn in the city´s craft-beer brewers, organic-food purveyors and environmentalists. Even some of the city´s famed indie-rock musicians are taking sides. The debate has prompted something of an existential crisis in this self-consciously liberal city, which votes Tuesday on whether to overturn the city council´s 2012 decision to fluoridate.

What Angelina Jolie
forgot to mention
CNN, by H. Gilbert Welch    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:54:23 AM     Post Reply
I first saw the headline early Tuesday on Real Clear Politics, a political news site where I generally start my morning. It´s not where I expect to see a story on breast cancer. Then I checked my e-mail messages -- they all seemed to be about Angelina Jolie´s op-ed. Students in my undergraduate class wanted to discuss it in our next session. Colleagues expressed concern and wondered what the right response was. People I don´t even know sent e-mails. One, from a research fellow at the International Agency for Research on Cancer, nicely summed up the general concern:

   

 

  


 
Three Signs There’s a Cover-Up
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:46:03 AM     Post Reply
The late columnist William Safire once said that a good clue that someone in Washington was engaged in “an artful dodge,” i.e., a cover-up, was that they used the phrase “mistakes were made.” Safire defined it as a “passive-evasive way of acknowledging error while distancing the speaker from responsibility for it.” The phrase became infamous when both Richard Nixon and Ron Ziegler, his press secretary, deployed it to explain away Watergate without explaining who did what and when or whether any ill motive was involved. Astonishingly, the Internal Revenue Service resurrected the Nixonian expression within hours

Deval as Holder’s fill-in?
That just wouldn’t be just
Boston Herald, by Holly Robichaud    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:27:24 AM     Post Reply
Just when you think the news surrounding Obamagate cannot get any worse, it does. Some say U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s days on the job are numbered and that it’s just a matter of when he’ll be forced to resign. While I’ll not shed a tear over Holder’s departure, one of the replacement names being floated has me reaching for tissues: Gov. Deval Patrick. Patrick has denied he’s interested — but the job isn’t on offer yet. If it is, President Obama should not select him nor should he be confirmed by the Senate for a plethora of reasons.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

52 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

   

 



 
BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

40 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

Republicans owe Rice an apology
on Benghazi, Obama adviser says

38 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 7:38:42 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said Sunday Republicans owe Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, an apology for alleging she played a part in formulating the White House’s response to the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, last year that killed four Americans. Pfeiffer said on ABC’s “This Week” that the release of more than 100 pages of Benghazi emails and notes show “beyond a shadow of the doubt” that accusations she tried to change the narrative of what happened in the attacks was false. "And, frankly, I think that many of the Republicans

   

Post Reply   Close thread 713957





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~