|
|
| |
Topic: Liberal Democrats: Higher rates for wealthy ´just the beginning´ |
Liberal Democrats: Higher rates for wealthy ´just the beginning´
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Jonathan Easley
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/30/2012 11:37:15 AM
|
| A group of House Democrats has formed its own “Gang of Six” to push for progressive tax reform — in which the expiration of the Bush-era tax rates for the wealthiest Americans is “just the beginning.” “In response to the call for progressives to draw a red line in the fiscal cliff sand, here is our big picture stance on corporate and individual tax reform,” Rep. Michael Honda (D-Calif.) said in a statement. “Six progressive tax principles from a new Gang of Six. The expiration of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest
|
Comments: What a complete shock coming from these Marxists. s/o They should call themselves the "Communist" caucus because that´s what they are. This group represents well the most odious members of the Democrat party.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Keekng, 11/30/2012 11:52:52 AM (No. 9041331)
The "Gang of Six" are the biggest takers in Congress. The only way they keep their jobs are by getting free stuff for their constituents.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
beca, 11/30/2012 11:56:23 AM (No. 9041337)
every democraP in office turns my stomach
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
ccyr, 11/30/2012 12:03:55 PM (No. 9041356)
The wealthiest Americans are not the same as the top income earners. Let´s be very clear on this. I only want to tax people like Sean Penn so wherever he fits in the formula, that´s who we ought to tax into oblivion.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
dogbreath, 11/30/2012 12:04:51 PM (No. 9041357)
just the beginning of the end for the democrat party. I have faith that Americans will come their senses, soon enough.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
GringoinQuito, 11/30/2012 12:11:01 PM (No. 9041376)
That right # 3 tax the hell out of the Hollywood do nothings. They do nothing to contribute to the betterment of society. They are the true takers. Inflated payslips and for what? The left complains about CEO salaries and they are running companies that produce for the common good. Why should a liberal actor make millions for a lousy 90 minute movie? If the left wants to get it right, tax these b......s 90% on their gross.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Mass Minority, 11/30/2012 12:15:07 PM (No. 9041389)
It is interesting to note that like every other "progressive" proposal not one of the six principles can be quantified in any way. They are all squishy feel good bumper sticker slogans.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
PatPiano, 11/30/2012 12:35:11 PM (No. 9041432)
It doesn´t surprise me to see Mike Honda of California at the top of the "Gang of Six". He´s from Northern California and No. Calif. is about as different from So. Calif. as night is from day. I always hated voting in No. California, because my husband and I were one of the few Republicans voting and the poll workers looked at us as if we were lepers.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
NYBruin, 11/30/2012 12:39:22 PM (No. 9041437)
Six times zero is still zero. . .
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
bighambone, 11/30/2012 12:43:37 PM (No. 9041444)
Goof luck to them in getting their socialist tax policies through the current House of Representatives.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Coach Springer, 11/30/2012 1:01:58 PM (No. 9041483)
It´s pretty much built in to tax-centered policy that the middle class will get it good and hard. Does anyone think that rasing the nominal rate on Buffett will get much more money out of the super rich? But we will be supposed to assume that they´ve done their part. In the end, it´s a stronger relationship between big businessa / the 1% types like Gates, Soros and Buffett and Democrat government.
Change the conversation to economic, not government growth and spending cuts. The budget balances, the economy win and the people take goernment out of the center of their lives. Leave the misdirection to taxes (rates, deductions, legalizing drugs for taxes, carbon - the whole thing) out of it.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Twinkle93, 11/30/2012 1:08:37 PM (No. 9041500)
I would like to see a conversation about the trusts that Pelosi, Kerry, Clinton, Buffet, Gates, Kennedy are sheltering their money in.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
dvc, 11/30/2012 1:09:40 PM (No. 9041503)
Their intent is to smash the system. Communism and socialism create and distribute misery, with the ruling class exempted from it.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
janjan, 11/30/2012 1:23:09 PM (No. 9041539)
Here is a news flash for these repulsive little dictators - 6 people in a gang don´t get to write the rules for everyone else. Go sit down.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
enemyofthestate, 11/30/2012 1:30:17 PM (No. 9041555)
OK, Honda, kindly forward your personal check to the U.S. Treasury and LEAVE THE REST OF US ALONE.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
jimmiet, 11/30/2012 1:51:29 PM (No. 9041616)
How many millionaires left Britain and France after higher taxes were imposed. Tax revenues will fall with the exit of producers in this country as well. The religion of the left is a mind sacrificing belief that is the envy of muslims everywhere.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 11/30/2012 1:54:57 PM (No. 9041627)
You can´t let the Democrats pick and choose who to tax. Start by sharing the pain by ending the extensions of the Bush and Obama tax cuts. Then end the extensions on unemployment insurance. Don´t cave on sequestration, force spending cuts.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/30/2012 2:31:36 PM (No. 9041696)
I hope you all know what comes next when this round of tax increases is done. First there will be a VAT tax, then a government take over of 401K retirement from all the people who provided for their own retirement making that as insolvent as the social security system. All of this is only a drop in the bucket of Obama spending. The entire global GDP could not supply Obama spending. His base will not be satisfied but then add in all the third world basket cases ready to tax the US through UN treaties which Obama favours. If you are going broke trying to satisfy domestic takers wait till all the takers of the world unite! Just the beginning indeed! It is not hard to predict where the ending will be.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
God of Irony, 11/30/2012 2:33:43 PM (No. 9041702)
It just blows mind how the gutless Republicans can´t even muster the courage to challenge these Marxists on how they think destroying the rich is going to pay off debt and benefit the free market.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
save America, 11/30/2012 3:40:06 PM (No. 9041827)
I´m sure that the ruling class will exempt themselves from this,just like they did with obamacare.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
ladychatalie, 11/30/2012 6:27:49 PM (No. 9042023)
Yes, but we know what they look like. When they run out of other people´s money, then even the obamaphone celebrants will shun them at best. Until there are consequences for democrats´ words and actions, they will not stop. They´re simply not able to stop now because they´ve gone insane.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Mediaite Exclusive: Internal Memo Proves That CBS’ Sharyl Attkisson Did Not Get Benghazi Emails Story Wrong
|
|
Mediaite, by Noah Rothman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/19/2013 10:17:21 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The revelation that the government’s talking points in the wake of the Benghazi attacks were edited to reflect the concerns of a variety of federal agencies has sparked a firestorm of controversy in recent weeks. Some early reports on that email exchange created the erroneous impression that the White House was more deferential to the concerns of State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, who sought to remove from those talking points a variety of references suggesting the Benghazi attack was the result of a coordinated act of terror. The actual interagency email exchange, released by the Obama administration on Wednesday,
|
| |
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
| | |
|
|