A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Parting Company
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Parting Company
Creators Syndicate, by Walter E. Williams

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 11/28/2012 6:03:21 AM

For decades, it has been obvious that there are irreconcilable differences between Americans who want to control the lives of others and those who wish to be left alone. Which is the more peaceful solution: Americans using the brute force of government to beat liberty-minded people into submission or simply parting company? In a marriage, where vows are ignored and broken, divorce is the most peaceful solution. Similarly, our constitutional and human rights have been increasingly violated by a government instituted to protect them. Americans who support constitutional abrogation have no intention of mending their ways. Since Barack Obama´s re-election,

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: mws50, 11/28/2012 6:17:34 AM     (No. 9037051)


And Dr. Williams pens another excellent column.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 11/28/2012 6:25:27 AM     (No. 9037064)

We have an illegitimate political system and an illegitimate government. For some time I have recognized that the struggle for freedom against totalitarian socialism will not be resolved by politics. It´s time to split the country, but it won´t happen soon enough. In the meantime, I do what I can to separate myself from the government, from the totalitarians, I avoid paying taxes as much as I can, I don;t do business with liberals, and I wait for some leadership and organization.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 11/28/2012 6:53:08 AM     (No. 9037091)

I think there may be ways to do a virtual secession without going through the formalities and deaths that would occur when Zero turned the military´s might against the people. I´m thinking of ways to cut off the money. You should be too.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: dman, 11/28/2012 7:00:56 AM     (No. 9037105)

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature´s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. ... But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." (Emphasis mine.)

Back to basics. Dr. Williams has it absolutely correct. The first Civil War did not settle the issue - it suppressed it.

The U.S.A. is not the "roach motel". States have the right to leave the union. Stiff penalties upon re-entry are appropriate, however.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: bubby, 11/28/2012 8:08:47 AM     (No. 9037170)

I would propose a confederation of red and blue states sharing only the cost of the military. The red states would get the conservative supreme court, lower taxes, fewer regulations, a safety net for the handicapped, no welfare, nothing for illegals and the boy scouts. The aclu would be banned. The blue states would get all the rest, higher taxes, welfare, more regulations, all the illegals etc. Every four years each state could vote to become a blue or red state. I just wonder how long it would take to change the whole country red?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: JLoophole, 11/28/2012 8:14:04 AM     (No. 9037180)

Love it #5. And we should get the Statue of Liberty. Once the stupor wore off from the utopian blues, guarantee we would have a serious illegal immigration problem... From the other side.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: bpl40, 11/28/2012 8:25:59 AM     (No. 9037197)

The subjugated States here are not a cohesive geographic unit but consist of dispersed ´givers´ to the parasites, spread all across the land. They should simply stop paying Federal taxes, in a peaceful organized movement of civil disobedience. Gandhi couldn´t be put in jail or tortured because there were 330 million supporting him, ready to go to behind bars.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Pepper Tree, 11/28/2012 8:28:20 AM     (No. 9037202)

Mr. Walter has caused me to rethink The War of Northern Agression. Exactly how was breaking from King George different from breaking with King Lincoln or King Barack?

If there was to be a split, the difference between the two would be as stark as NORKs and South Koreans. It would be absolutely neccessary for Constitutional States to be ajoined. Otherwise, having to travel through statist territories to reach another friendly state would be like trekking through a jungle of starving cannibals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Felixcat, 11/28/2012 8:54:05 AM     (No. 9037239)

Exactly #8 - one may not have agreed with the Confederacy and wanting to keep slavery as the receason for seceeding, but thay were legally right to do so if they felt their rights were being violated.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: dolphin, 11/28/2012 8:54:06 AM     (No. 9037241)

Mega dittos Professor Williams!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: WAN2, 11/28/2012 8:57:01 AM     (No. 9037246)

Barry will not allow free men (ahem, producers) off his plantation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 12 - Posted by: MattMusson, 11/28/2012 9:00:11 AM     (No. 9037249)

Are there is issues and crises that would actually prod states into secession?

Of Course.

The Bureaucrats in Washington do not have a blank check.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: stablemoney, 11/28/2012 9:10:38 AM     (No. 9037269)

The unions have seized our government and vote themselves high salaries and early pensions. The electorate votes themselves income redistributed from the responsible. The elections are fraudulent. There is nothing in this arrangement for responsible and productive people. It is time to withdraw.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: On fire, 11/28/2012 9:15:22 AM     (No. 9037281)

Nice one #11, I think I can make a bumper sign out of that!

Meanwhile, I´m trying to avoid companies with blue state headquarters - Sears, Chase, Target etc. GM & Chrysler were history ages ago.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Crosscut, 11/28/2012 9:15:58 AM     (No. 9037283)

Sounds good in theory. But, the parasites, like roaches, will flock to the red states to be taken care of. Bringing their crime, illegitimate breedings, drug habits and ignorance with them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: STLstudent, 11/28/2012 9:19:22 AM     (No. 9037287)

Secession is the only peaceful option. If we continue down the current path there will eventually be 1861 Part 2. For those of you who attended government propaganda centers known as "Public Education", 1861 was the year the so-called American Civil War started.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: trapper, 11/28/2012 9:26:10 AM     (No. 9037298)

Barack Hussein Obama is determined to destroy the America we love, but we´ll show him! We´ll destroy it ourselves. Seriously?

Sigh.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: JimK1, 11/28/2012 9:33:55 AM     (No. 9037317)

Civil War II will not be as pretty as the first one. It may be more necessary, it may be more righteous, but it will not be as pretty unless the military has had enough and decides to stick with the Constitution and ditch Zippy. If the military splinters, I hate to think of the results.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 19 - Posted by: Eheu Fugaces, 11/28/2012 9:49:57 AM     (No. 9037348)

The division was already voted in on November 6. -- and it´s an easy one. Take a look at the electoral rsults map. Blue America, or Greater Moonbattia -- as I prefer to think of it, runs up the Pacific Coast, through Washington State, then across the Northern Tier to the Great Lakes Region and thence across to Ohio and the Mid-Atlantic States and down to Maryland.

Some states should be split: For example, eastern California (red) v. Coastal California (Blue), similarly Washington and Oregon. Ohio should be split into Northern and Southern Ohio, Northern Ohio (Blue) -- including Cleveland (ultra blue), no great loss, while Southern Ohio (red) can join the free states. Similarly, Pennsylvania, with Eastern PA (including Philadelphia) obviously being a "keystone" of Moonbattia SSR. I don´t know what you do about South Florida a/k/a Brooklyn with Palm Trees, except I have been wanting to build a wall around it since it has begun spreading up to my neck of the woods.

As for the capital-- how about a new one in the middle of the country, as in Omaha or Wichita or Tulsa?



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Arby, 11/28/2012 9:53:59 AM     (No. 9037357)

The ´irreconcilability´ comes from democrat irrationality and hate. They hate the rich so they want to raise taxes. Read the piece today on Drudge--Britain did that and lost billions in tax revenue. However, Obama thinks it´s fair to cut off his nose to spite his face. How can you ´reconcile´ or ´compromise´ with people who are, fundamentally, ideologically-driven idiots?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: smcchk, 11/28/2012 10:01:06 AM     (No. 9037381)

My husband and I are planning to buy property in a red state. Things could get much worse and we would rather ride it out in a red state than our blue.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Safari Man, 11/28/2012 10:12:21 AM     (No. 9037402)

W O W... This article gave me goose bumps. This is the most powerful, succinctly stated summary of all that I believe about where we are today and what was so evil about Lincoln and what the North did to the South in the civil war. Sure, the South was in the wrong as well (never should have fired upon Sumpter, for one thing), but the South should have been allowed to govern itself as its people wanted and thus let the North "prove" that their approach was better. Lincoln was he second worst president this country has ever had. He followed Marx´s communist manifesto point #4:

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

see http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: andyboy, 11/28/2012 10:16:17 AM     (No. 9037406)

Thank you, #5, #8 and #20 for your good thoughts.

What I wouldn´t give to see two separate countries, Red America and Blue America. Within 10 years, the contrast between the two would be greater than the current contrast between South Korea and North Korea (and for the same reasons).

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 24 - Posted by: mickturn, 11/28/2012 10:27:03 AM     (No. 9037422)

It is all said here:

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/divorce-agreement-between-conservatives-and-liberals/question-2673469/

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Safari Man, 11/28/2012 10:29:23 AM     (No. 9037429)

I responded above before I read the other posts...

I have been lurking on this site since 2002 and posting since 2004 and this is probably my favorite thread I have ever seen here. Fantastic article, super-high quality comments from all ldotters. I just wish we had the gumption to take action (and maybe we do, but I am not yet seeing it).

I would say that #5´s solution is closest to a practical solution which we could actually realize. I seem to recall Romney discussing the idea of pushing the responsibility for all social programs down to the states to avoid the national redistribution problem. When I heard Romney talk about those ideas, I really thought we had some real hope.

I really like the idea of the federal government´s funding being paid by the states, and not the people of the states. This allows each state to decide how to raise revenue, and each state could form its own approach. May the best state win.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Susannah, 11/28/2012 10:38:41 AM     (No. 9037449)

What do you propose to do with the blue inhabitants of red states? Imprison them? Exile them? Kill them? 41.34% of Texans voted for Obama. They may not leave willingly. Should they be stripped of their citizenship and deported to New York or California?

And what about the red states that have many more takers than makers: South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, and Kentucky? They get more federal money than they pay in taxes. Will the more affluent red states support them?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: mickturn, 11/28/2012 10:41:16 AM     (No. 9037457)

Dear Liberal run Companies,

It has come to my attention you are supportive of Socialistic policies for the running of America.

I on the other hand have chosen to NOT do business with your company in any fashion.

Thank you for being honest about your ill intentions for our great Country. See you in Bankruptcy court!

Citizen of America, Fed up with Liberal Lies!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: owl, 11/28/2012 10:44:38 AM     (No. 9037464)

The Red states produce - food and energy . And if the big , worn-out city ( think Detroit , Pittsburgh, Cleveland ) panhandlers don´t stop , and leave us alone , sorry , no more handouts . We´re sick and tired of puling your cart when all you can do is shout " faster " .

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Butch59, 11/28/2012 10:49:23 AM     (No. 9037477)

IF it could be accomplished (secession) it would necessarily need to have an in place plan (Constitution) ready for the states to accept. The current Constitution would be used with some modifications (term limits being on. And others that space does not permit me to list). It would be a good start.

As for Obozo turning loose the military on red state America like Lincoln did, I´m not too sure that would work in today´s world. Simply because, if I´m not mistaken, the majority of service members come from red states. Those that live in the blue states, large population centers, and receiving their "entitlement" don´t usually join the military. It´s too hard and has too much discipline for them to handle. So I really don´t think that our good and brave soldiers, sailors, and airmen are going to turn on American. Especially at the whim of Obozo. Most of them don´t like him anyway.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: owl, 11/28/2012 10:55:59 AM     (No. 9037501)

I jumped too 26 . But to add to #20 , Northern Ca. has wanted to secede from Moonbattia for some time . Conservative farmers who have had to fight the likes of Boxer and watch their crops die because of a fish . Fresh vegs. we´d have on our side . I can hear SF howl ...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: mickturn, 11/28/2012 10:57:51 AM     (No. 9037508)

#27, the answer is very simple if you go to the core problem. People who receive welfare in various forms are either disabled (for real), too lazy to work, unemployeed due to bad Obama policies, or on the dole due to lax laws passed by Liberals.

Answer: For the truly disabled, we help them, for the unemployeed we help them get jobs but if they are really slackers we cut them off, for the lazy and on the dole we cut them off as well, AND we make it so those that don´t work cannot vote. Soon the lazy and slackers will either get jobs or leave for Blue states for their continuing freebees. Problem solved!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Safari Man, 11/28/2012 11:00:14 AM     (No. 9037514)

#27 blue inhabitants of red states would be welcome to stay and would benefit from the freedoms and opportunity the rest of us would enjoy. Now, if they were in need of heavy mooching, it would behoove them to relocate to the blue states since there would be no such thing as "government support" in red states (one would hope). And blue state citizens would be welcome to relocate to a red state, as long as they are self-sufficient and don´t expect any government handouts.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: BorninOKC, 11/28/2012 11:05:27 AM     (No. 9037525)

A problem with succession, or the Balkanization of America, call it what you will is that very soon those who opted for the "blue" side would want to move to the "red."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: snakeoil, 11/28/2012 11:17:26 AM     (No. 9037550)

Succession is an emotional reaction to our current situation. Can you see all 57 states with their own currency, post office, etc. Would you like it if you were driving to another state and were stopped by customs and had to declare what you´ve got. What about the gold in Fort Knox? Who gets that. We´re stuck with this country. And the country is over because a majority of the voters see the role of government is to steal from the workers and give to the bums.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Quigley, 11/28/2012 11:29:51 AM     (No. 9037575)

If a state were to secede, it could simply implement a propaganda policy aimed at making the Gullible Class (ie, dimocrats) believe that there was free money in California and the seceding state would soon be free of the Morons in Our Midst.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: Rafter, 11/28/2012 11:38:54 AM     (No. 9037591)

Time to refloat my recent proposal...
for the...
Divided States of America.

The Heartland Red States will happily wave Buh-Bye to the following general regions...
What I like to call...
The Four Corners (plus Chicago-Madison area)

Coastal California consisting of Liberoids...
Puget Sound area plus Hawaii...
South Florida Liberoid areas...
Northeast from No. Virg Suburbs of DC to Maine including Philly, etc...
Great Lakes Liberoids in Chicago and Wisconsin...

The Four Corners (The Divided States of America)...
can have the Liberoid Agenda...

The Red States of the Heartland remain normal traditional America...
Ronald Reagan´s America.

Works for me.
Gotta go... this is the short speedy version...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 37 - Posted by: RancherJack, 11/28/2012 11:56:37 AM     (No. 9037622)

I am a lineal descendent of men who stoof barefoot in mud and ice, firing upon Washington empowered Blue Coats to literally save the Constitution.

To Save The Constitution

“When the South raised its sword against the Union’s Flag, it was in defense of the Union’s Constitution.”
Confederate General John B. Gordon

“Instead of friends, I see in Washington only mortal enemies. Instead of loving the old flag of the stars and stripes, I see in it only the symbol of murder, plunder, oppression, and shame.”
Rose O’Neal Greenhow, Confederate Spy



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: kanphil, 11/28/2012 12:32:01 PM     (No. 9037679)

Dr Williams raised this issue before, I think around the time of Obie´s first coronation. He clearly doesn´t think the danger has subsided in the meantime. People who love the Constitution are being pushed beyond their power to abide the abuse. Maybe red states can reclaim some of their sovereignty through negotiation, and achieve a "soft landing". But if not, blood will flow.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: strike3, 11/28/2012 12:47:32 PM     (No. 9037712)

I like all of your suggestions for a peaceful settlement of the liberal parisitism that has us in its grip. Most of the ideas would work provided that the liberals could live without our money.

Prepare for violence because they can´t and it won´t be peaceful.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: tgoggin, 11/28/2012 1:11:02 PM     (No. 9037749)

Just a matter of time...I would welcome it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: Talega, 11/28/2012 1:20:10 PM     (No. 9037762)

Hey #6, ever notice Lady Liberty raises her torch with her right hand?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: chance_232, 11/28/2012 1:51:30 PM     (No. 9037814)

The first myth about the "civil war" is that it was a "Civil War". A civil war is where opposing sides fight for control of the country. The so called "civil war" would be better called any of the following:

The War of Northern Agression
The Unpleasantness Between the States
The War of Southern Session
The War of of Southern Independance
The Southern Revolution.

The second myth of the civil war is that it was fought over "slavery". Slavery was adopted by Lincoln as a justification to wage war on the Confederate States of America in order to gain the "moral high ground". The north may have been anti-slavery, but they were and continue to be more racist than anything that I´ve seen in the south.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 43 - Posted by: Sheepfarmer, 11/28/2012 2:04:58 PM     (No. 9037826)

This article made me change my views on the civil war, and on secession. Just the thought of an America where conservative principles rule makes me feel hopeful. Thank you, Walter Williams.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 44 - Posted by: Grambo, 11/28/2012 2:27:54 PM     (No. 9037857)

A serious national discussion of this matter might awaken some of the bubble-dwellers of the realities serious minded people recognize and are preparing to deal with, relative to their utopian fantasies and arrogant parasitic predation on the producers in this country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 45 - Posted by: lawless11, 11/28/2012 2:31:23 PM     (No. 9037866)

Is anyone else concerned with the number of high ranking military officials that have been recently released, resigned or reassigned? Is this a purge of loyalty?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 46 - Posted by: mainecoonmama, 11/28/2012 2:41:15 PM     (No. 9037881)

Well, we better hurry up and do it! This younger generation (not all, but most) would never have it in them to secede.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 47 - Posted by: OhMy, 11/28/2012 3:08:14 PM     (No. 9037942)

How could separation be unconstitutional in light of the first words of the Declaration of Independence...
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature´s God entitle them"
If America separated from England why could a state not separate from the USA?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 48 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 11/28/2012 3:20:02 PM     (No. 9037972)

Oh, this is just the beginning of the beginning of the dismantling of the United States of America. The disaster is just starting to unfold it´s webbed wings to display its full glory. We are in for a hell ride and all we can do now is hold on.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 49 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 11/28/2012 3:31:48 PM     (No. 9037996)

Now, wait. Think. The Southern States successfully achieved secession. The remaining states in the Union had raised no huge levy of forces, or up-armed. The Union had surrendered most arsenals, equipment and supplies, though some more jealous Federal agents burned their depots rather than let the Confederacy have them. It was a peaceful secession altogether. And them came the issue over Ft. Sumter and the Southern hotheads fired a shot in anger at a legally held Federal military base. It was on! If the Southerners had simply held their peace and had refrained from going to violence, merely for violence sake, they would to this day still be an independent nation. Secession is one thing- a declaration of war is entirely another.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 50 - Posted by: thelmalou, 11/28/2012 3:45:39 PM     (No. 9038018)

Wow. what a great article. I do love me some Walter E. Williams. ;)


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 51 - Posted by: little guy, 11/28/2012 4:44:45 PM     (No. 9038130)

It all depends on how you perceive the Union part of "united" states. In the 1860´s, the south felt the union was like joining a club or a church. If you don´t like the rules, you are free to leave and go to another club or down the road to another church. That would be how Jeff Davis and others felt. Many other people, however, felt the union was more like a marriage. You can´t get a divorce without permission. You can´t just walk out. That´s how Lincoln (the lawyer) felt. Many southerners who voted to leave the union were the same guys who had voted to ENTER the union. (Especially in Texas. Thus, they thought they could just leave.

The south, however, had "benefited" from the marriage (harbors, roads, forts, bridges, etc) and owed a bill to the other states for these services. Many civil war historians actually believe that had the southern states united in a federal law suit and sued to leave the union, they would have won the right to do so in Congress. However,part of the divorce settlement meant paying "alimony" to the other states for awhile and many southerners didn´t want that. Sadly, it led to a hot war too soon. We all know the rest. Lincoln, like Obama, didn´t let the crisis go to waste. He used that as an excuse to fight back (knowing he had more resources) and got what he wanted down deep. The end of slavery --- as well as preserving the Union.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 52 - Posted by: little guy, 11/28/2012 4:45:42 PM     (No. 9038132)

Part two;

Today, we may find ourselves like the U.S.S.R. when the Ukraine started to pull out. The Russian army refused to shoot their cousins (remember Yeltsin on the tank saying "shoot me!"). The good news is the U.S. military will never support Obama and fire on fellow Americans (as long as they don´t foolishly shoot first!) in which case "suing to leave the Union" is actually a quite viable option.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 53 - Posted by: Ribicon, 11/28/2012 5:03:54 PM     (No. 9038173)

A more recent estimate from a demographic historian in New York puts the death toll at 750,000 lives lost.
NY Times link:
http://tinyurl.com/c28s8zh

And another quote from H.L. Mencken:

"The American people, North and South, went into the [civil] war as citizens of their respective states, they came out as subjects, and what they thus lost they have never got back."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 54 - Posted by: Ribicon, 11/28/2012 5:06:54 PM     (No. 9038180)

#53, escalating taxation of the South to fund infrastructure development in the North was one of the triggers of the war. The South was the wealth generator at that point in time, not the other way around.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 55 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 11/28/2012 5:58:20 PM     (No. 9038274)

Thank you, Dr. Williams. My sentiments exactly.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 56 - Posted by: busterman, 11/28/2012 7:45:59 PM     (No. 9038408)

The military shouldn´t be an issue either. Every single member has taken an oath to the Constitution. Therefore, they do not hold allegiance to a particular political party.

If there are current military members who do not wish to remain loyal the Constitution, they may resign and become part of the Blue states.

The rest, and all of our national military assets, remain in or move to Red states.

And since we´re using the existing Constitution as the mechanism for secession, there´s no need to develop a new one.

What we WOULD need to do is prevent our adversaries from occupying Blue states. That could be a tricky situation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 57 - Posted by: 4Justice, 11/28/2012 7:57:44 PM     (No. 9038424)

Here we go again... Nope, won´t work. #7, 15, 17 & 34 (to name a few) are correct. And yes, you would be not only creating balkinization but the red states will be cut off from most of the coastal ports which will hurt them the most. Williams is looking at the civil war too simplistically still. While the right of a state to secede is there, would it really be in that state´s or the country´s best interest to do so? The same reason exists today (if not more so) as existed in 1861 for not allowing secession to occur. It creates economic and military vulnerability. We would essentially be destroying any chance of restoring this great country and we would likely be taken over by foreign interests. And, is it right to cut families apart or to abandon those folks who have fought hard all these years to get their home states back from the leftists? BTW, Reagan´s "country" was California--not Kansas or Texas.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 58 - Posted by: RoseOfTexas, 11/28/2012 7:59:27 PM     (No. 9038427)

"41.34% of Texans voted for Obama. They may not leave willingly. Should they be stripped of their citizenship and deported to New York or California?"

Yes, please!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 59 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 11/28/2012 9:20:16 PM     (No. 9038523)

I think this was a splendid article and thanks for posting it. I know my teachers in grade school were astounded when I told them I thought lincoln should have left the south alone and btw, there were not that many slaves in the south. You had to be wealthy to buy them from the europeans and the south had their cotton and raised their own food and they, for the most part, took care of the slaves as valuable property. Not right, but it was that time - Margaret Mitchell and Gone With the Wind is very accurate and well researched. My fav book.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 60 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 11/28/2012 10:03:48 PM     (No. 9038595)

Secession would only be achievable by war or forcing the federal government into insolvency. Both of these have very ugly outcomes...or, do we maintain the status quo, the left stays in control with a state-run media´s help, control of the schools, and control of banks, and control of our money.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 713556




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



New grand jury expected to be seated
in Gov. Rick Perry´s ethics case
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 1:18:20 PM     Post Reply
AUSTIN — A Texas judge was expected to seat a grand jury Monday in an investigation into whether Gov. Rick Perry abused his power by vetoing funding for public corruption prosecutors last year. Special State District Judge Bert Richardson was to oversee the impaneling in Austin. The governor’s office didn’t return messages seeking comment, but The Austin-American Statesman and KVUE-TV reported that Perry took the unusual step of hiring a criminal defense attorney to represent him. The attorney, David Botsford, did not return calls from The Associated Press seeking comment. In June, the governor threatened to veto funding approved by the Texas Legislature

A Pitiful Pulitzer Pick
Commentary Magazine, by Max Boot    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 12:34:31 PM     Post Reply
The Pulitzer Prize board has just managed to do the impossible. It has awarded a prize that deserves to be spoken of in the same conversation with its risible 1932 award to the New York Times correspondent Walter Duranty for articles whitewashing the evils of Stalinist Russia. The award of the Public Service prize to the Washington Post and the Guardian for serving as a mouthpiece for Edward Snowden is an attempt by the journalistic establishment to put its stamp of approval on the actions of one of the most destructive traitors in U.S. history—a former NSA contractor who has done

Texan, 23, Headed To State Prison
For Urinating On The Alamo
Smoking Gun, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 12:27:47 PM     Post Reply
A Texas man was sentenced yesterday to 18 months in state prison for urinating on the Alamo. Daniel Athens, a 23-year-old El Paso resident, pleaded guilty earlier this year to a criminal mischief charge in connection with the April 2012 incident at the Texas shrine. While Athens could have faced a maximum of two years in custody, a plea deal saved him up to six months in custody. Athens was also ordered to pay $4000 in restitution by District Judge Ray Olivarri. Since Athens is not eligible for parole, he will have to serve the entirety of his 18-month sentence. As detailed

Rand Paul for President
Wall Street Journal, by Bret Stephens    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 9:25:40 AM     Post Reply
Republicans, let´s get it over with. Fast forward to the finish line. Avoid the long and winding primary road. It can only weaken the nominee. And we know who he—yes, he—has to be. Not Jeb Bush, who plainly is unsuited to be president. He is insufficiently hostile to Mexicans. He holds heretical views on the Common Core, which, as we well know, is the defining issue of our time. And he´s a Bush. Another installment of a political dynasty just isn´t going to fly with the American people, who want some fresh blood in their politics. Unless the dynasty is

Progressive Puritans
Reason Magazine, by Matt Welch    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:42:20 AM     Post Reply
When I first started hearing people on the political left describe themselves with some frequency as progressive back in the 1990s, the term did not seem tethered to the epoch-defining, early-20th-century spasm of moral crusading and government centralization that helped give us everything from trust busting to Prohibition to the Federal Reserve. As articulated by champions like Ralph Nader and Molly Ivins, the progressive label was both a way to get out from under the generation-old baggage of liberal-a term Ronald Reagan and others had turned into an epithet-and to differentiate lefties from seemingly apologetic triangulators like Bill Clinton and

Eleven Days to November
Politico Magazine, by Larry Sabato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:39:40 AM     Post Reply
For political junkies desperate for clues to the hottest House, Senate and governors’ races around the country, April is the cruelest month. While Illinois and Texas primaries were held last month, the 48 remaining state contests don’t start up again for three weeks. Here’s the good news for those of us hoping to determine whether Democrats or Republicans will be celebrating in the fall: From early May to early September, we’ll have a steady stream of conventions, primaries and runoffs to keep us busy. We’ve already learned a little from the first two contests. On March 4, Texas told us two contradictory

Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

53 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

44 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it

Atlanta Braves flooded with Hank
Aaron hate mail: He’s a ‘s*****g’

30 replie(s)
Washington Times (D.C.), by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/15/2014 3:23:19 PM     Post Reply
Hank Aaron’s recent comments about the need for America to realize that racism is still very much alive and thriving — only now due to those who wear “neckties and starched shirts” rather than KKK hoods — has sparked an angry backlash and many fans are turning the tables, calling the baseball legend himself a racist. “Hank Aaron is a s*****g piece of [expletive] [racial slur],” one man said in an email to the Atlanta Braves’ front office, one of the teams Mr. Aaron used to play for, CBS News reported. “My old man instilled in my mind from a


Post Reply   Close thread 713556





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~