|
|
| |
Topic: Flu jabs are a ´waste of taxpayer´s money´, claim scientists who say the benefits have been over-hyped |
Flu jabs are a ´waste of taxpayer´s money´, claim scientists who say the benefits have been over-hyped
Daily Mail [UK], by Sophie Borland
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Attercliffe, 11/22/2012 6:24:51 AM
|
| The benefits of the annual flu jab have been ‘over-hyped’, scientists claim. They say the vaccine is far less effective than is widely believed, with some studies showing it protects less than two-thirds of the population. The US researchers say ministers in Britain as well as America are ‘wasting taxpayers’ money’ on the jab.[Snip]They say that although Government officials claim it protects between 70 and 90 percent of the population, this is actually not the case. In fact, they say, it protects just 59 percent of adults aged 18 to 65, but is far less effective in the elderly.
|
Comments: From 12,000 study results dating from the 1930s.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Keekng, 11/22/2012 6:40:53 AM (No. 9028885)
In 1993 my employer demanded I get a flu shot. That year, my spouse and entire family were hit with a terrible flu which lasted, for some, 2 weeks. Thanks to the shot, I did not get the flu. Since then, I have gotten a shot every year and have not had the flu. That shot is a pretty good insurance policy.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
tivadoc, 11/22/2012 7:31:07 AM (No. 9028939)
Most people aren´t aware of this. No vaccine is perfect, especially flu vaccine. A lot of science goes into creating that vaccine each year and most times it´s very good. Many years ago I got infected with a true flu. Two weeks out of work and I questioned my survival. I get the flu vaccine every fall and have been fortunate not have contracted a flu illness since. It´s a smart thing to do, especially if you fall into one of the groups specifically encouraged to receive the vaccine.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Brittany, 11/22/2012 7:37:24 AM (No. 9028946)
The elderly have many other health problems which compromise their reaction to the flu virus. No flu prevention shots can be developed to protect from all flu viruses as they vary each season. I was a doubter but at 79 have never had a reaction to the shots I started taking or had the flu.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Rather Read, 11/22/2012 8:01:11 AM (No. 9028969)
I have had a flu shot for years. The only time I got the flu, I was working in retail and interacting with lots of germy people (and their money). All the rest of the time, I have not gotten the flu. I´ll continue to get the shot (or jab in Britspeak), since I don´t want to EVER get the flu again. I don´t know when I have felt so sick.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
GardenGal, 11/22/2012 8:04:34 AM (No. 9028975)
However, there is also a new study out there that shows a huge decrease in cardiac death rates among those who got the flu shot the previous year. There are also great decreases in strokes, pulmonary embolisms, and deep vein thrombosis.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
nina584, 11/22/2012 8:07:22 AM (No. 9028978)
Interesting set of comments...all favorable towards the flu shot!
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
uno_thatguy, 11/22/2012 8:10:41 AM (No. 9028982)
If you´ve had the flu, you know what "an explosive headache" is every time you cough for the next two weeks. Get the shots. They´re not perfect, but the flu IS a perfect storm in your life if you get it!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Keekng, 11/22/2012 8:12:45 AM (No. 9028984)
Depending on age, pneumonia and Shingles shots are also important.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
PeoplesRepublikNY, 11/22/2012 8:21:26 AM (No. 9028990)
Yet more "studies show" drivel about overstating the benefits of certain medical procedures from the crowd intent on rationing health care.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
srhcb, 11/22/2012 8:22:28 AM (No. 9028992)
So "the government" and "scientists", to say nothing of the pharmaceutical companies and health providers who make money off the shots, have "over-hyped" flu shots?
How about the compliant media, who love any story they can fit under a scare head/lead-line? Why didn´t they ask any questions?
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
jerseyden, 11/22/2012 8:29:25 AM (No. 9029002)
Isn´t it amazing now that liberals are in charge the elderly don´t need as much health protection. If a conservative was in office the headline would read" They are trying to kill off the elderly". All those who voted for these liberals I hope will not get the shot and also not get the other tests they say are not effective(mamagrams, prostate, etc)
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Keekng, 11/22/2012 8:37:04 AM (No. 9029013)
Egggggzactly, #9, you nailed it!
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
nonsense, 11/22/2012 8:38:33 AM (No. 9029015)
I have not had a flu shot for years. I do not trust the vaccine, especially since they combined it with the H1N1 flu shot. Have you ever read the "ingredients" in the flu shot? An incredible cocktail of chemicals. Haven´t had the flu for decades.
Strange that every pharmacy in town offers flu shots now. Must be some profit in it.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
OceanBeach, 11/22/2012 8:39:36 AM (No. 9029016)
59% is better than I would have guessed. For 20 bucks I´ll buy one at least as long as there´s a child in my house.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
rabbit, 11/22/2012 8:41:57 AM (No. 9029018)
If you go read the studies and look at the statistics (I have), you will see that these scientists speak the truth. The estimates of annual flu deaths often used in reporting come from decades ago. There is no evidence that the rate of flu in the population has decreased at all since the flu shot became so widely disseminated via grocery stores and pharmacies over the last decade. No evidence of the rate of flu falling among pregnant woman and infants since they started advising shots for these populations. Plenty of situations where there were adverse reactions to the flu shot themselves - hardly surprising when you give it to infants with immature immune systems.
The flu shot´s effectiveness is around 59%. Keep in mind, a 50% rate would say that you may get it, and you have an equal chance that you may not got it, if you have the shot. So there is merely a 9% swing towards - "Here, try this, it ´may´ help." You will find a higher statistical chance of avoiding the flu by drinking orange juice, taking your vitamins, and washing your hands frequently. The rest of the world - quite rightly - thinks that we Americans are simply mad about our ´faith´ - and that is all it is - that modern medicine can jab us into health.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
gartenfrau, 11/22/2012 8:42:58 AM (No. 9029021)
I now get the flu shot at work every year as I am a RN. I caught the true flu once 21 years ago just after my son was born. 103 fevers for 3-4 days straight, severe body aches and fatigue. The gartenherr was Active Duty Army back then and he had to take leave to take care of me and the kids as I could barely get out of bed. I´ve made sure I get a flu shot every year since then. Even if it´s not a perfect match, it´s still better than nothing
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
earlybird, 11/22/2012 8:46:03 AM (No. 9029025)
Let´s see. PSA tests? Skip them. Colonoscopies? Skip them. Mammograms? Skip them. Flu shots? Skip them.
Does anyone see a trend here which seems to emanate from those countries that have socialized medicine, the NHS, etc., and ours now that Obamacare is "the law of the land"?
I´ll take my flu shot, thank you very much.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
LouD, 11/22/2012 8:56:06 AM (No. 9029038)
My wife got the shot three years running. She also got the flu those three years. I never got the shot, and never got the flu. And that after coming in contact with kids at school for 25 years. Just saying.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
mitzi, 11/22/2012 9:34:07 AM (No. 9029105)
The one year (2008) that I did´t get a flu shot, I did get the flu and I never want to go through that again!
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl, 11/22/2012 9:35:16 AM (No. 9029107)
In the early 90s, I got a horrible case of the flu and was sick as a dog for several weeks, then dragged around for several more months. I´ve had flu shots ever since.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Duckboy, 11/22/2012 9:47:48 AM (No. 9029128)
I had the flu in 1988. After that, I´ve had the flu vaccine every year. I´ve never had it again. That´s a pretty good track record, in my book. I work in the health care industry, I´m exposed EVERY year, multiple times.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/22/2012 10:17:11 AM (No. 9029184)
No treatment should be forced on anyone and any treatment that is certainly not harmful should never be denied to anyone. Any patient should have access to any treatment if they are first informed about it. Vaccinations contain adjutants and preservatives such as mercury that can cause serious damage. Vitamin D supplements would do more good for anyone who lives in the north than any jabs. It is dirt cheap and has no down side. I had a friend who was brought down with Guillian Barre Syndrome after his flu shot. Also there is a treatment promoted by Dr Rowen where 6 or 7 ounces of blood is drawn and irradiated with UVC light and reinfused into the same patient does wonders in stimulating the immune system. Closing question: Why do conservatives have so much trust in big government/establishment medicine for their health? There is a revolving door between the FDA and big pharma jobs. You don´t trust big government with your money why trust them with your health?
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
rollingcow, 11/22/2012 10:46:37 AM (No. 9029248)
I´m with ya on the Shingles shot, #8. I never thought about it until I got them this year. Everyone told me I was lucky not to have the rash, but I´m here to tell the pain is horrible and I´ve been dealing with it since around July. Whether or not you get a flu shot do yourself a favor and get the one for Shingles. Mrs. Cow
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Tsquare, 11/22/2012 11:04:01 AM (No. 9029288)
Tivadov...anecdoted play both ways without adding to science. In my case, my flu of 40 years ago was very debilitating, but no flu shot, and no flu, since.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
woofwoofwoof, 11/22/2012 11:07:33 AM (No. 9029301)
Being of a certain age, I think I already have a moderate resistance to pretty much everything out there. I have never got the shots, and have not had a full-blown flu in at least 30 years. I do get some minor cold and cough now and again, and me and everyone at work got that nasty pneumatic one - ten years before it was included in the annual flu shot.
So I´m a bit skeptical that it has a lot of value for the older. Mebbe. Better yet, mebbe in a few years the technology will improve and they´ll find a generic flu shot that blocks the all. I might finally sign up for that one.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 11/22/2012 4:31:39 PM (No. 9029720)
Every human is a unique universe of systems, so their reaction to inoculation will vary. Personal medicine is around the corner, though. Once your personal system is understood, treatments should be much more effective.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 11/23/2012 5:41:09 AM (No. 9030178)
If you want to get shot up with aluminum, formeldehyde and possibly some form of meningitis, go right ahead.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
|
Woolwich attack: Help For Heroes website crashes as thousands try to donate
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Ben Farmer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/23/2013 7:36:53 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The charity said the site had been inundated with traffic after news broke that the victim, believed to be a serving soldier, had been wearing one of its T-shirts. As news of the killing quickly spread on social media, there were calls for people to visit the site to donate, or buy T-shirts or other merchandise as a show of support. The site´s shop quickly crashed and parts were still out of action on Thursday morning. A spokesman said: "Last night with the website, there was clearly a lot of interest." The charity, which raises money to provide better care
|
Barack Obama is rapidly losing his halo
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Peter Foster
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/23/2013 1:35:55 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Is the worm turning against Barack Obama? After four-plus years of being given the benefit of the doubt by the bulk of the US media, the President now suddenly feels more vulnerable. Today both the New York Times and the Washington Post have run prominent and angry editorials and columns slamming the administration for its attempt to criminalise a Fox News reporter James Rosen for working a State Department source to obtain a story. The "Rosen Affair"--as it is now known--is poisoning the well in Washington at an alarming rate for Mr Obama, with an indignant White House press corps
|
Opium addicts of Afghanistan: Number of junkies TRIPLES to 150,000 despite war on drugs
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/21/2013 7:41:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A heroin addict father smokes the deadly drug contentedly as his two innocent children sit watching him adoringly. The oblivious man is part of a growing epidemic in the war-torn country of Afghanistan, which has seen the number of opium and heroin addicts tripling to 150,000, according to latest United Nations Figures, while 225,000 used the drug in 2012. In a country with a population 35million, there are now more than 1m addicts of one drug or another. It represents a major problem for the country, which produces 90 percent of all opiates in the world. Until recently
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner lost her rights
|
|
Politico, by Rachel Bade
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
All of Obama´s Scandals Are Ultimately About Information Control
|
|
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|