|
|
| |
Topic: Leading OB-GYN group endorses greater contraceptive access |
Leading OB-GYN group endorses greater contraceptive access
Washington Times, by Keely Brazil
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/20/2012 7:12:12 PM
|
| The nation’s largest professional organization of women’s health experts is now calling for over-the-counter sale of all oral contraceptives. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) said in a statement released Tuesday making birth control available without prescription would help decrease the rate of unplanned pregnancies in the United States. The group did not return calls by press time. Given the group’s prestige and influence, the statement — a step beyond ACOG’s recommendation last month to make emergency contraception available over the counter
|
Comments: I can´t see anything going wrong by selling contraceptives over the counter. What a great idea. s/o They act like these are no different than an aspirin. The last package insert I saw was extremely long and you could barely read it with all the legalese and warnings. More insanity from the left.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Johnny Angle, 11/20/2012 7:15:15 PM (No. 9026483)
As lot more stuff should be sold over the counter. Soon you will have to wait for months for simple medical care (I think you may know why) and you may have to fend for yourself.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
BillboardBabe, 11/20/2012 7:17:36 PM (No. 9026491)
Yes . . . more mortal sin is clearly the answer. Yesssss.....
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Persecutor2, 11/20/2012 7:19:27 PM (No. 9026494)
I dunno, like some others here i am starting to re-think my position on contraceptives. I certainly don´t want the Sandra Flukes of the world reproducing.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jntsrgn, 11/20/2012 7:21:11 PM (No. 9026501)
First gal who has a blood clot or stroke and maybe they rethink it.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
mamafrog, 11/20/2012 7:23:27 PM (No. 9026503)
Over the counter medications are not covered by insurance, and they cannot be reimbursed by some flex spending account. This may be a way for insurance companies to avoid paying for contraceptives.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
sfacheem, 11/20/2012 7:25:20 PM (No. 9026510)
How ´bout stop dropping your skirt for the Easter Bunny and crossing your legs once in a while? Or would that interfere with your "hookups" with guys you´ve never met?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Mr. Hanky, 11/20/2012 7:35:06 PM (No. 9026537)
Hey I´ve hot a better idea. Stop PAYING for unwanted pregnancies.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
jacooley, 11/20/2012 7:43:41 PM (No. 9026549)
I may break with the herd here, but the conservative part of me favors having more OTC products. Aspirin and Tylenol are both quite deadly things, yet we can buy them OTC. Prescriptions drive up medical costs and some of the drugs we now buy now (like allergy medicines and acid reflux drugs) were once available only via prescription. Unless there is a compelling safety reason to restrict access, I favor the OTC route.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
AltaD, 11/20/2012 7:44:52 PM (No. 9026554)
For decades we´ve heard "my body, my choice" and if that choice is to take the Pill without first visiting a doctor, so be it.
And, I do think it would cut down on unplanned pregnancies and abortions. High school and college women who won´t go to an ob/gyn will still have sex so why not make the best contraceptives OTC?
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Hawgguy, 11/20/2012 7:46:21 PM (No. 9026558)
Sure - what else can we do to shrink our demographic. The Muslims won´t mind.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
nina584, 11/20/2012 7:52:02 PM (No. 9026575)
The side effects of the pill are horrendous and when the patient is not properly screened deadly!!
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Mr. Hanky, 11/20/2012 7:52:39 PM (No. 9026579)
I have no problem with making birth control more available... But let´s be real, it´s very available now....
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
horacer, 11/20/2012 7:55:11 PM (No. 9026583)
There are a number of medications that should be moved from prescription to over the counter. It´s a little unusual to see a physicians group like the ACOG advocating for it.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
pinkpanther, 11/20/2012 7:58:30 PM (No. 9026593)
The use of contraceptives have actually increased unplanned pregnancy and abortion. It creates a contraceptive mentality and any pregnancy is viewed as a "failure" and something that should be suppressed. What could go wrong letting 12 year old girls or the adult boyfriends of those girls buy contraceptives over the counter? Let´s just remove parental authority even more in this society because it has led to such good results right?
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
formerlyphelps, 11/20/2012 8:01:27 PM (No. 9026599)
If you are not old enough or capable enough to arrange for contraception through the myriad sources already available, you should not be engaging in sexual activity.
This article cites "unwanted pregnancy" as the primary reason. That is not due a lack of access, but a lack of responsibility and understanding of consequences.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
wendybird, 11/20/2012 8:53:23 PM (No. 9026676)
Then who are we going to sue for a (possible) adverse consequence? I know, make all physicians pay an annual mandatory fee, like the neurologic birth injury fee all physicians have to pay even if they don´t deliver babies (but not as much as OBGYN´s are dunned), simply because they are physicians, and by definition, filthy rich. The only medical group still actually representing physicians that I know of is the AAPS, Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. The rest are extensions of the AMA and "government health care", which is an oxymoron.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Jiobaobubai, 11/20/2012 8:54:12 PM (No. 9026677)
Then they can pay for it.
When certain individuals cannot or do not accept the consequences and responsibility for their own actions, the everyone must pay for them. Which is a violation upon those who DO accept the consquences and resposibility.
The federal government is violating my rights!
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
god of irony, 11/20/2012 9:22:31 PM (No. 9026703)
Then they should put their money where their genitals are and pay for it themselves.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
caljeepgirl, 11/20/2012 9:33:13 PM (No. 9026711)
Good idea! Definitely a step in the right direction. More contraceptive use = a lot fewer abortions, not to mention a lot fewer "unwanted" children.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
berthabutt, 11/20/2012 10:00:46 PM (No. 9026738)
Sure don´t have any proof that more access has reduced birthrates. 1960´s saw 5% unwed moms, so 50+ yrs of sex ed. & accessible birth control & abortion on demand saw it rise to over 40% of children born to single moms, nearly guaranteeing a life of poverty. Idiots giving more lighter fluid to the arsonists.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
john56, 11/20/2012 10:36:42 PM (No. 9026782)
This news should make Sandra Fluke happy.
Now, she can skip the trip and co-pay to the doc and just head over to get the free Obamacare birth control!
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
veritas, 11/20/2012 10:39:17 PM (No. 9026787)
"I´ll take ´Ideas as Stupid as Giving Whiskey and Car Keys to Teenage Boys´ for $200, Alex."
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
killerbee, 11/20/2012 11:01:17 PM (No. 9026814)
Here´s the thing with going to the doctor to get your birth control prescriptions: it forces you to get a yearly exam. And, yes, women do need yearly exams (I happen to think men should go yearly for a prostate exam, as well) because when things happen, they happen fast. And there are no symptoms until it´s too late.
And let´s not even mention the fact that putting hormones in your body is serous business. And then there´s the self-medicating aspect where people make moronic mistakes all the time.
This is just a bad idea. Birth control in the form of condoms (also helpful in avoiding STDs) is available over the counter. What´s wrong with that?
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
montanabound, 11/20/2012 11:05:55 PM (No. 9026817)
Years ago, my son was prescribed Claritin, and it cost us a $10 copay. Then they made it OTC, and it cost us $25. So I say go for it!
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Salt5792, 11/20/2012 11:40:26 PM (No. 9026849)
Won´t make any difference. Those women want to get pregnant.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Mollygoose, 11/21/2012 12:22:09 AM (No. 9026875)
"Yes . . . more mortal sin is clearly the answer. Yesssss....."
I´m married and don´t want more children, so, mortal sin ... seriously?
How ´bout stop dropping your skirt for the Easter Bunny and crossing your legs once in a while? Or would that interfere with your "hookups" with guys you´ve never met?
I´m MARRIED and don´t want to be pregnant again. My husband is my only partner, so, "hookups," reeealllly?
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|