|
|
| |
Topic: Hostess shutdown hits Mass. workers in stomach |
Hostess shutdown hits Mass. workers in stomach
Boston Herald, by Ira Kantor
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:JoniTx, 11/16/2012 2:58:00 PM
|
| Hostess Brands Inc., whose sweet treat roster includes Twinkies, Ding Dongs and Ho Ho’s, filed a motion today in bankruptcy court seeking permission to shut down its business and sell its assets, including its iconic brands and facilities. The company, based in Irving, Texas, is moving “promptly” to lay off most of its 18,500-member workforce, which includes nearly 300 workers at 13 Hostess facilities in Massachusetts, and has suspended bakery operations at all its plants, said company CEO Gregory F. Rayburn. The company’s board of directors authorized the wind down of Hostess Brands after one of its largest unions,
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Judith, 11/16/2012 3:01:31 PM (No. 9018977)
It´s what the citizens voted for.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
coldborezero, 11/16/2012 3:04:31 PM (No. 9018988)
18,500 jobs lost. Unions and Obama voters. Keep your job with a pay cut or drive your company out of business and join the unemployment rolls. Genius.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
JediJerry, 11/16/2012 3:06:55 PM (No. 9018996)
Greddy capitalists bakers were just making people fat anyway. If they would have stayed in business Obamacare would have put a cap and trade regulation on Twinkis and Ho-Ho´s, then only people like Michael Moore who could afford to buy other peoples rations of the yummie treats could have all they want with no limits. PLus he won´t need O-care because he can afford to go to doctors in Mexico and Cuba rather than wait in long lines at an O-clinic with the rest of the poor people in the country.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
JonR, 11/16/2012 3:07:19 PM (No. 9018997)
When you lie down with dogs (unions), you get up with fleas (no jobs)! Very good union workers! I hope your unemployment benefits are enough to keep your homes! Fools!!!
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DaBigGuy, 11/16/2012 3:08:42 PM (No. 9018999)
Hostess is dead, White House congenital lying is alive.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
fire_mission, 11/16/2012 3:10:47 PM (No. 9019002)
Who knew we were at a Twinkie Cliff.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Cav160, 11/16/2012 3:11:05 PM (No. 9019003)
Ironic isn´t it, since this POS has been re-elected unemployed benefits go back to 29 weeks in January 2013! Poetic justice for obamabots!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
VinGoombatz, 11/16/2012 3:11:39 PM (No. 9019005)
Now if the Department of Education and the Department of Commerce
could similarly...SHUT DOWN.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
horacer, 11/16/2012 3:12:19 PM (No. 9019007)
Old union joke - A union member would rather be out of a great job than work at a good job. It´s not a joke anymore. I feel bad for all who lost their job. My first hostess treat was a snowball. I fell in love at first bite.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
bpl40, 11/16/2012 3:12:49 PM (No. 9019009)
You asked for it, you got it Toyota! Well.. in this case Twinky.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Blackeagle, 11/16/2012 3:13:55 PM (No. 9019011)
Discovered in the ration pantries of 1960s-era fallout shelters, these tasty morsels have often been found to be still edible. So there is still time to run down to your local Pak and Sak and buy up a lifetime´s supply. I know Micheal Moore will be.
just kidding.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
RayLRiv, 11/16/2012 3:14:10 PM (No. 9019013)
Hope. Change.
/sarcasm off
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Ret.TxLeo, 11/16/2012 3:16:38 PM (No. 9019018)
5,000 refused to work with the company and it cost the other 13,500 their jobs. Just think the Liar in Chief is refusing to work with the House..refusing to cut the real fluff..refusing to cut spending for the few for the better of the many...anybody else see the irony?
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Persecutor2, 11/16/2012 3:17:58 PM (No. 9019021)
I got a feeling we´re going to see a lot more of this kind of thing.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Jethro bo, 11/16/2012 3:18:52 PM (No. 9019023)
I went out an bought a box for Thanksgiving. I grew up with twinkies but not sure my kids did. So that will be our TG treat. At least I will know they enjoyed the same childhood delight I knew. Welcome to the age of the soviet revolution inAmerica. From a land of plenty to hoarding distant memories.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Coy860, 11/16/2012 3:21:55 PM (No. 9019031)
Elizabeth Warren will start a pemican factory..jobs..very little wampum to start.s/
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
NorthernDog, 11/16/2012 3:32:00 PM (No. 9019055)
Expect lots of ´´disability´´ claims, which means they´ll never be counted as unemployed.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
stonepony, 11/16/2012 3:32:50 PM (No. 9019059)
In today´s new America no job is better than any job.... the goverment will keep paying those who do not work....
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 11/16/2012 3:33:21 PM (No. 9019061)
This is what you get when you vote for democrats.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
NYBruin, 11/16/2012 3:35:00 PM (No. 9019063)
The Hostess brand is too valauable to waste away. Look for an investor (like - gasp - Bain Capital) to buy the assets in bankruptcy and resume productioon within a few months.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
LittleHoodedMonk, 11/16/2012 3:36:52 PM (No. 9019067)
Actually, I see the unemployed unionist sponging off the Amerikan people, now.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
TheMotherCO, 11/16/2012 3:37:53 PM (No. 9019070)
Not to worry, as another poster said, they have a shelf life of many years. I never liked the dern things. My Sis and I made better concoctions with our own made up recipes.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Susannah, 11/16/2012 3:38:31 PM (No. 9019071)
The sad thing is, these people weren´t union members; they were workers in the retail outlet stores.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Keekng, 11/16/2012 3:40:20 PM (No. 9019076)
Just one tip of the proverbial iceberg.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
janjan, 11/16/2012 3:43:02 PM (No. 9019085)
There is going to be an avalanche of layoffs coming. This is only the beginning.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
killerbee, 11/16/2012 3:43:35 PM (No. 9019089)
Merry Christmas, workers! Love, your union
I already see people blaming Hostess for the shut-down. As if anyone wants to go bankrupt and shut down their whole business. This isn´t a threat. Congrats, Obama electorate.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
JoElla Bee, 11/16/2012 3:44:34 PM (No. 9019092)
Rush said, at the end of his program today, that the WH has a petition up on its "we the people" site asking that Obama nationalize the Hostess Company. Kid you not.
Haven´t been to the site, but it apparently gives the impression that "the people" want Obama to "save twinkies".
Rush said (somewhat sarcastically) that he wouldn´t be surprised if Obama bailed out the Hostess company, and turned it over to the unions.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
The Advocate, 11/16/2012 3:55:42 PM (No. 9019113)
This is part of Obama plan to destroy small business and nationalize the name brands like Hostess and turn them over to his union thugs. If hostess is nationalized aka bailed out -it will go the way of gm.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
provide, 11/16/2012 4:08:29 PM (No. 9019140)
Little Debby stock skyrockets.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Kurto, 11/16/2012 4:15:39 PM (No. 9019156)
#23 Sad? You must be misinformed. They walked out on strike. The company warned them. They did not come back to work. Hostess is done negotiating.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
grambo, 11/16/2012 4:23:15 PM (No. 9019170)
John Galt, call your office.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Susannah, 11/16/2012 4:27:09 PM (No. 9019177)
#30, no, I´m not misinformed. Those facilities in Mass. that shut down were non-unionized retail outlet stores. The company informed the retail outlets that they´d close (along with everything else)if the union wouldn´t agree to a new contract. The union refused, and the non-unionized workers all lost their jobs. So, yes, I do feel sorry for them. They weren´t union, and they didn´t ask for this.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Bubbasuncle, 11/16/2012 4:33:34 PM (No. 9019186)
#27, that was my first thought when I heard the news, every company that fails will be "saved" by the government and turned over to the unions.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
L.A. Guy, 11/16/2012 4:34:46 PM (No. 9019192)
The "Detroit-ing" of America.
Nothing funny about this except
when Hostess is bought out and moves the Jobs to a Right-to-work State, eliminating Socialist Union thugs...
Granted, this MUST be done before Obama sics the DOJ on the Company like he did with GM and force a Union controlled Equity majority on the company, which will bankrupt them all over again.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
afherkdriver, 11/16/2012 4:36:28 PM (No. 9019196)
I would wager that most of those in Mass. that lost their jobs voted for Ø . Massachusetts is famous for voting for liberals. That school system must be something else.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Teleologicus, 11/16/2012 4:52:51 PM (No. 9019218)
Unfortunate for everyone involved, including, I fear, the American taxpayer. But it is a lesson for those willing and able to be instructed. This is the kind of thing that is necessary to get the attention and penetrate the skulls of a substantial number of citizens, most if not all of whom are Obama supporters. Of course one painful collision with reality will not be sufficient to get the point across to most. A single instance can be explained away, blamed on someone else, or rationalized somehow to preserve the underlying fantasy structure. There will have to be many more such rude awakenings before a sufficient number of American sleepwalkers finally awake and realize that yes, Virginia, there really is something called reality. This means, among other things, that one cannot always have everything one wants and to which one feels entitled. It means that the relationship between reality and fairness, while it exists at some level, is by no means linear or 1:1.
It is impossible for the economy to recover under a tax and spend, soak the rich, regulation-crazed administration. Advanced degrees in economics are not needed to grasp this. They may even be a handicap for many.
And of course Obama´s confusion about international relations means that the latter will continue to deteriorate, violence will escalate, and wars will break out.
It is a hard, painful, costly way for American voters to learn, but there are no social promotions and no cheating in this course. If you don´t learn the lessons you just keep repeating the course.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
mominNoCA, 11/16/2012 4:53:18 PM (No. 9019219)
Maybe they can apply for jobs at General Motors. Better yet, they can get jobs in the Green Energy field. Now *those* jobs will last!
/s
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
loyalreader, 11/16/2012 5:03:14 PM (No. 9019240)
Obama told them they didn´t build it anyway and Obama and his minions for darn sure shut it down.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
xcenturion, 11/16/2012 5:04:52 PM (No. 9019242)
Ah poor blue state union worker. I feel so bad for you!
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
ArthurDent, 11/16/2012 5:17:01 PM (No. 9019264)
According to Treacher at Daily Caller, via some other site, all the principals of the company were dim bigwigs. Heh!
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
Daylily, 11/16/2012 5:18:07 PM (No. 9019267)
Obama told us just before his 2009 inauguration that he wanted to fundamentally change our country, and he´s well on his way. We may see many more bankruptcy filings by companies. I believe this person living in our WH wants to take our country down so he can rebuild it and reign as dictator in chief.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
mutant geezer, 11/16/2012 5:21:33 PM (No. 9019274)
If the workers at the plants were smart (alas, there´s the fly in the ointment), they would get together with their union and make an offer to buy the company. The union has tons of money and Hostess is going to be sold to somebody so it might as well be them. I´m sure Obama would guarantee the loan.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
The Advocate, 11/16/2012 5:27:30 PM (No. 9019277)
Re 42 A union buyout with taxpayer guarantees would delay the final destruction of the company and cost taxpayers money. Any union buyout will be chick fil a´d aka not buying government twinkles.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
paulfromTexas, 11/16/2012 5:32:25 PM (No. 9019285)
I think they called it a "mandate". When you lie down with dogs, you sleep with the fleas. Bon Appetit
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 11/16/2012 5:34:08 PM (No. 9019289)
What would Archie Bunker say?
And am I the only one affected by these delayed ads that are coming on in sequence? I would rather have the popups.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
strike3, 11/16/2012 5:42:47 PM (No. 9019304)
Nobody wins here. The union just lost the dues of 18,500 workers. The workers lost their jobs. The government just lost 18,500 taxpayers. The rest of us will be asked to support them with less money. John Galt is looking smarter every day and it´s only just begun.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 11/16/2012 5:44:02 PM (No. 9019305)
Merita Bread just layed off hundreds of employees.
How´s that union working for you ? Or are they using you to keep themselves in business ?
The strike should be against unions instead of employers.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
athina, 11/16/2012 6:14:31 PM (No. 9019354)
My son just told me there´s a #hostessshrugged on twitter.
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
Grace Veritas, 11/16/2012 6:17:40 PM (No. 9019364)
Rand thought it would be oil and steel and rail. Who could have known it would be Twinkies?
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
Safari Man, 11/16/2012 6:36:43 PM (No. 9019392)
I see this as part of the resistance, albeit a natural part. The motivations for being in business in this country are all but gone. If a company hits even the slightest obstacle, it makes sense to shut down and live off your savings. We´ll start seeing much more of this, I suspect.
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
bob913, 11/16/2012 6:37:49 PM (No. 9019395)
Take a 8% pay cut for a year then going up 3% for 2 years then 1% in the 3rd year. Cut in pension 2%.
You said no to a company in bankruptcy!! Now you all have a 100% pay cut and probably lose your pension.
The union boss still has his job as he has other suckers paying his salary.
#20 is right. I think Bain would do good to buy the brand. None of the workers would be re-hired as they are too stupid.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
nevernaught, 11/16/2012 6:47:39 PM (No. 9019413)
Stuff like this has consequences beyond just Hostess Brands. 18,500 jobs lost is just a start. All those other companies that furnish Hostess with ingredients and other supplies will be adversely affected by loss of revenue.
That Twinkie in the White House may have Just lost the Twinkie vote. Do Wookies eat those things?
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
ArthurDent, 11/16/2012 7:03:27 PM (No. 9019449)
Sorry, my earlier post was incorrect, here is the article about Hostess EVIL CORPORATE OWNERS. Heh!
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-11-16/hostess-liquidation-curious-cast-characters-twinkie-tumbles
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
WIBadger, 11/16/2012 7:12:57 PM (No. 9019472)
Own it....!
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
Evocatus, 11/16/2012 7:45:38 PM (No. 9019528)
Print the names and addresses of all the Union Local leaders and the National Management of the Union, you know, so the unemployed can thank them PERSONALLY, if ya´ know whut I mean, bada bing.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 11/16/2012 8:04:10 PM (No. 9019555)
This is the new tactic. Union workers have been told that Obama will pull a GM & give the company to the union. They really do not think the company is closing.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
Aindyin, 11/16/2012 8:54:58 PM (No. 9019606)
al-Qaeda still alive, Hostess dead way to go Obama union thugs
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
ZaMan, 11/21/2012 5:03:25 PM (No. 9028192)
Deleted by LCom Staff.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"
|
|
Obama admits he’s a socialist
|
|
New York Post, by Kyle Smith
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:59:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
You may be forgiven if you missed it during last week’s tsunami of scandals, but President Obama finally let slip that he is a socialist. Buried in the 17th paragraph of one of those mewling New York Times pieces on the woes of Obama — can we start calling him Woe-bama yet? — appeared these two words: “going Bulworth.” Obama himself, the Times explained, has been “longingly” telling his inner circle that what he’d really like to do is what Sen. Jay Bulworth, played by Warren Beatty in his 1998 movie “Bulworth,” did: to go public as
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
WH: Legality of IRS Action Against Conservatives ´Irrelevant´
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:43:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Appearing on Sunday morning on ABC News’ This Week, White House Senior Adviser Dan Pfeiffer told a credulous George Stephanopoulos that the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups was “inexcusable,” and that the law with regard to the activity was “irrelevant.” “I can’t speak to the law here,” he said. “The law is irrelevant. The activity was outrageous and inexcusable, and it was stopped and it needs to be fixed so we ensure it never happens again.” When asked for clarification, Pfeiffer expounded: “What I mean is, whether it’s legal or illegal is not important to the fact
|
WH: ´Irrelevant´ Who Edited Benghazi Talking Points
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by William Bigelow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:40:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Appearing on CBS’ Face the Nation, White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said that it was “largely irrelevant” who edited the talking points the Obama administration trotted out in the aftermath of the terrorist attack in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Host Bob Schieffer asked, “That was just a PR plan, to send out somebody who didn’t know anything about what had happened. Why did you do that? Why didn’t the Secretary of State come and tell us what they knew, and if they knew nothing, say ‘We don’t know yet?’ …. Why are you here today?
|
WH: ´Irrelevant´ Where Obama Was During Benghazi Attacks
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by Ben Shapiro
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:37:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Fox News Sunday this morning, White House spokesman Dan Pfeiffer was asked by Chris Wallace where in the White House President Obama was during the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans. “Question,” asked Wallace. “What did the President do the rest of that night to pursue Benghazi?” Pfeiffer answered, “Look, the President was kept up to date on this as it was happening the entire night, from the moment it started until the very end …. I recognize that there’s a series of conspiracy theories Republicans have been spinning about it
|
Non-deportation rate drops — to 99.2 percent
|
|
Washington Times [DC], by Stephen Dinan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:28:53 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Homeland Security Department has granted legal status to 99.2 percent of all illegal immigrants who have applied under President Obama’s new non-deportation policy for young adults, according to the latest numbers released Friday. That’s a slight drop from the 99.5 percent approval rate reported last month. The policy, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, grants legal status to most illegal immigrants under the age of 31 who came to the U.S. before age 16 — usually brought by their parents. They are allowed to remain in the U.S. without fear of deportation, and are given work
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|