A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: The Petraeus Affair
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The Petraeus Affair
American Spectator, by Jed Babbin

Original Article

Posted By:garnet, 11/12/2012 7:50:05 AM

It´s such a cliché. A powerful man, away from home for years at a time, in jobs that put him under enormous emotional strain. A younger woman, attached to him by her job, spending endless hours with him on and off duty. That they fell into a love affair is so ordinary as to be boring. What makes the sudden fall of CIA Director David H. Petraeus different? Nothing, really, except perhaps the timing of his defenestration, and even that is only mildly suspicious. Petraeus had almost disappeared from sight after his move to the CIA last year.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: pineledger, 11/12/2012 7:55:32 AM     (No. 9008442)

I urge you all to Google "YouTube Denver Alumni Symposium 2012 Paula Broadwell" and watch the video before they take it down. The URL is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPaf5OJSskY

A number of interesting things come out there, among them the information that Petraeus was being passed over for Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and that HE was the one who suggested he head up the CIA.


Reply 2 - Posted by: hardhead, 11/12/2012 7:58:24 AM     (No. 9008445)

FTA´ Unless congressional Republicans are complete idiots, they will get his testimony early next year.´ There is nothing to suggest that they are NOT complete idiots.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 11/12/2012 8:02:57 AM     (No. 9008451)

I thought these people worked for us and for the benefit of the U.S.

Turns out neither we the people or even the congress are allowed to know what in the wide, wide world of sports is going on.


Reply 4 - Posted by: CEP, 11/12/2012 8:19:23 AM     (No. 9008472)

Who took care of her children? Wasn´t her husband the least bit concerned?


Reply 5 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 11/12/2012 8:22:27 AM     (No. 9008477)

´Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.´
- Proverbs 16:18


Reply 6 - Posted by: dreedle, 11/12/2012 8:31:19 AM     (No. 9008499)

As soon as I got to the word "defenestration" I stopped reading.


Reply 7 - Posted by: pinger, 11/12/2012 8:34:30 AM     (No. 9008505)

You know....the irony of the Bengazi "investigation" is that no matter what are determined to be the facts around the attack(and of course, we all know that the investigation was completed within 8 or 10 days of Sept. 11), can we now really trust the government....or the media....to tell we the people the true and real story? I think not.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 11/12/2012 8:36:59 AM     (No. 9008508)

First, easy rule of DC political scandals: as long as the Clintons are around, suspect them first.


Reply 9 - Posted by: lakerman1, 11/12/2012 8:51:03 AM     (No. 9008535)

Paula was not attached to Petreus because of her job.. That is a lie.
Petraeus was speaking at Harvard, she was in the audience, he gave her his card, and told her to call him. And she probably smiled, breathed deeply, thrust her breasta at him...and the romance novel began.
Then the lebanese babe horned in on Paula´s territory, and Paula lost it.
I think that may be the correct story, although there may be more women involved..


Reply 10 - Posted by: LanieLou, 11/12/2012 9:33:44 AM     (No. 9008623)

1) Petraeus challenged the Obama strategy as illegal.

2) Paula enlisted to seduce general for blackmailing.

3) The Lebanese babe enlisted to act as cover for conduit to the FBI... to muddy the trail of how they got involved.


Reply 11 - Posted by: AGGW, 11/12/2012 9:39:58 AM     (No. 9008644)

#6 got further than I. I couldn´t get past "love affair."
Affairs are not love affairs; they are lust affairs.


Reply 12 - Posted by: steveracer, 11/12/2012 9:51:07 AM     (No. 9008681)

For reasons unknown to me, the first thing I thought of was that wacky astronuatrix some years back who travelled across country non stop wearing a diaper to warn off another woman not to mess with her man. That wasn´t Paula, what it?!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 11/12/2012 10:03:41 AM     (No. 9008721)

That speech is from an intelligent and capable woman who got caught up in the grasp of lust. The life of a warrior and the separation from family and friends for months and years at a time takes its toll.

What a tragedy for her and her family and their hopes for the future. What a loss, hopefully temporary for a woman who can be a real asset to this country.

There are going to be horrible hits on her and Petraeus on this thread and others, and rightfully so. At these levels of security it is not tolerable, but in the overall view of humanity it is understandable. And the women who constantly lambast the men/horndogs gotta remember there´s very often a woman involved if not flaunting their wares. And that´s not to excuse.


Reply 14 - Posted by: fed-up, 11/12/2012 10:19:23 AM     (No. 9008766)

It´s not the affair .... its the timing and the testimony. As many who know how things are done, this is something that had to have been known many months ago. Long before Bengazi. He came out with the statement that it was the video too soon, but then later made sure that it was known that no one at CIA ever turned down request for help.. I thought at the time it was kind of a convoluted statement, but now I can see it clearer.
Obama (or his handlers)stalled out the story till after the election but held this affair over his head for hopes he would be discredited. And so far its working. Shame on folks for falling for it!


Reply 15 - Posted by: Felixcat, 11/12/2012 10:56:16 AM     (No. 9008859)

If Petraeus does testify - he´ll plead the Fifth.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 11/12/2012 1:27:42 PM     (No. 9009181)

The comments here stretch the meaning of "ludicrous.". I am not going to dignify them with an explanation. Thank you in advance for not insisting.


Reply 17 - Posted by: bighambone, 11/12/2012 10:19:57 PM     (No. 9010134)

Have you ever heard of a 4 star general taking the fifth before the Congress?


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: pigop, 11/12/2012 10:26:37 PM     (No. 9010145)

#17 There is always a first time for everything.



Post Reply   Close thread 711665




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"



Dissent Festers in States
That Obama Forgot
New York Times, by John Harwood    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/19/2013 2:43:55 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — You might call North Dakota the antithesis of President Obama’s political base. Whites make up 90 percent of its population, which is fewer than one million people and mostly in rural areas. Its proportion of people 65 and over exceeds the national average. There was never a chance that North Dakota would give Mr. Obama its three electoral votes. So Mr. Obama has not given North Dakota his time. It is one of six states he has not visited as president, along with South Dakota, Arkansas, Idaho, South Carolina and Utah. He has gone just once

Do You Trust This Man?
National Journal, by Ron Fournier    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/18/2013 8:46:19 AM     Post Reply
There is a common element to the so-called Obama scandals—the IRS targeting of conservatives, the fatal attack in Benghazi, and widespread spying on U.S. journalists and ordinary Americans. It is a lack of credibility. In each case, the Obama administration has helped make controversies worse by changing its stories, distorting facts, and lying. The abuse of trust may be taking a toll on President Obama´s reputation. A CNN/ORC poll of 1,104 adult Americans June 11-13 shows the president´s job approval rating at 45 percent, down 8 percentage points in a month. Among young voters, only 48 percent approve of the president´s performance,

No Need to Rewrite History,
Mr. President
Real Clear Politics, by Carl M. Cannon    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/17/2013 7:49:39 PM     Post Reply
In a sign of our (not very civil) times, Michelle Obama was heckled at a recent Democratic Party fundraiser by a perturbed lesbian activist, Ellen Sturtz. The first lady seemed ruffled. "One of the things I don´t do well is this," she said, as she left the podium, moving toward the protester. Looking at Sturtz, but addressing the crowd, Mrs. Obama said, "You can listen to me or you can take the mic, but I´m leaving. You all decide. You have one choice."

   

 



 
When Lying Is Acceptable,
The Public Loses
Associated Press, by Liz Sidoti    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/17/2013 7:44:14 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — A member of Congress asks the director of national intelligence if the National Security Agency collects data on millions of Americans. "No, sir," James Clapper responds. Pressed, he adds a caveat: "Not wittingly." Then, NSA programs that do precisely that are disclosed.It turns out that President Barack Obama´s intelligence chief lied. Or as he put it last week: "I responded in what I thought was the most truthful or least most untruthful manner, by saying, ´No,´ because the program was classified."

Privacy Isn´t All We´re Losing
Wall Street Journal, by Peggy Noonan    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/14/2013 12:26:17 PM     Post Reply
The U.S. surveillance state as outlined and explained by Edward Snowden is not worth the price. Its size, scope and intrusiveness, its ability to target and monitor American citizens, its essential unaccountability—all these things are extreme. The purpose of the surveillance is enhanced security, a necessary goal to say the least. The price is a now formal and agreed-upon acceptance of the end of the last vestiges of Americans´ sense of individual distance and privacy from the government. The price too is a knowledge, based on human experience and held by all but fools and children,

Liberalism Is Bankrupt
American Spectator, by Marta H. Mossburg    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/14/2013 6:09:28 AM     Post Reply
The high priests of liberalism must be tossing and turning in their organic cotton bedding and downing more small-batch artisanal whisky each night trying to cope with the abject failure of their cause. They know, even if the masses do not yet fully understand, that their worldview no longer makes sense in light of scandal after scandal in Washington and that the end result could be a great, if slow, deconversion on the scale of the millions who no longer believe in the Christianity its philosophy replaced.

You Thought You Had Privacy
Before the NSA Leak?
What About Facebook?
Daily Beast, by Michael Daly    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/13/2013 7:44:25 AM     Post Reply
Your privacy has already been invaded by Facebook and the other tech giants that collected the data in the first place. If the government is turning to Big Brother in an effort to safeguard the homeland, then the tech companies are Rich Uncles, intent on getting ever richer. And for Facebook and the others, data translate to advertising dollars. Click on the word “privacy” at the bottom of “your” Facebook page and you are told, “We receive data about you whenever you interact with Facebook,



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence
in new documentary, claim original
conclusion about cause of crash is wrong

105 replie(s)
FOX News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM     Post Reply
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded

Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says
Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress

53 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM     Post Reply
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.

Obama: ´If Catholics Have
Their Schools and Buildings
and Protestants Have Theirs ...
That Encourages Division´

51 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 3:46:48 PM     Post Reply
Likening religious schools to segregation--a racist system that forced blacks to attend different schools and use different facilities than whites in the American South--President Barack Obama told a town hall meeting for youth in Belfast, Northern Ireland on Monday that there should not be Catholic and Protestant schools because such schools cause division. "Because issues like segregated schools and housing, lack of jobs and opportunity--symbols of history that are a source of pride for some and pain for others--these are not tangential to peace; they’re essential to it,"

Edward Snowden Is In The
Process Of Destroying Any Support
And Sympathy He Has Built Up

48 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM     Post Reply
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information

G8: Barack Obama looks like
a president going through the motions

38 replie(s)
Telegraph [UK], by Alex Spillius    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:58:06 AM     Post Reply
Listening to Barack Obama give his speech in Belfast on Monday, it was hard not to stifle a yawn. I kept waiting for the part when he would say something interesting, but, about three quarters of the way through, realised it wasn’t going to come. Judging from television pictures some of his young audience felt the same, after the initial rush of euphoria of receiving the rock star president in their midst had passed. This is not surprising, for we had already heard this number about the inspirational role of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Emerald Isle’s

How Democracies Perish, Deathbed Edition
37 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Daren Jonescu    Original Article
Posted By: steveW- 6/18/2013 6:11:46 AM     Post Reply
This is the thirtieth anniversary of the publication of How Democracies Perish, an analysis of the spread of world communism by Jean-François Revel, one of freedom´s most serious French defenders since Tocqueville. At the heart of this work, Revel details "The Tools of Communist Expansion," among which the most relevant for understanding our current situation comes in Chapter 16, "Ideological Warfare and Disinformation." The profound simplicity of Revel´s nuts and bolts account of totalitarianism´s Cold War advance, far from being obsolete

Paula Deen admits in deposition using
N-word, telling racist jokes, reports says

37 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Hobbiest- 6/19/2013 6:03:40 PM     Post Reply
Celebrity chef Paula Deen admitted in a recorded deposition to telling racist jokes, using the N-word, and planning a slavery-themed wedding, according to multiple reports. The May 17 deposition where she made the alleged admissions is part of a $1.2 million lawsuit brought by Lisa Jackson, the former manager of a Savannah, Georgia, restaurant run by Deen and her brother Bubba Hiers. Jackson alleges in the suit that Deen used the N-word at the restaurant and that Hiers sexually harassed her. According to the reports, in the deposition, Deen replied “Yes, of course,”

   

Post Reply   Close thread 711665





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~