|
|
| |
Topic: The Myth of the Missing Three Million Republicans |
The Myth of the Missing Three Million Republicans
American Thinker, by Jack Cashill
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 11/12/2012 7:26:04 AM
|
| A score of people this past week have asked me about the three million Republicans allegedly "missing" at the polls this year. For starters, if the Washington Post is to be believed, Mitt Romney received 1.3 million fewer votes than John McCain did in 2008, not 3 million. For the record, Obama received 7.5 million fewer votes in 2012 than he did in 2008. More than 1.1 million of the Republican votes were "lost" in California. It is not that California Republicans turned against Romney. His percentage of the vote was higher than McCain´s in 2008.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Johnny Angle, 11/12/2012 7:40:03 AM (No. 9008420)
What will the Republican leadership do to combat this fraud? Nothing. What did they do about the patently biased debate moderators? Nothing; if they had, fat-mouth Fats Crawley would not have been there.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Spidey, 11/12/2012 7:44:08 AM (No. 9008424)
Hate to say it but maybe Romney´s religion was a big reason he lost.The left used a lot of underhanded ways to attack it without Obama´s fingerprints on it.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
NuGoddess, 11/12/2012 7:51:13 AM (No. 9008438)
Anyone who was too prissy to vote for Mitt because of his religion is a traitor, pure and simple.
I do not give a rat´s patoot about a candidate´s religion, provided they can prove they support and will defend my country.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
EnsignO´Toole, 11/12/2012 7:53:22 AM (No. 9008440)
Did Jack´s article get truncated? There is no conclusion to his article - he´s way too good a writer to just leave us hanging.
If the short article is it, I do think he has a point about states where Republicans are so outnumbered. However, New York state has some Republican Representatives as does California. Just remember Darrell Issa is from California and Peter King is from New York. I can´t imagine they would have been returned to Congress but people in their Districts voted for Obama - that doesn´t make sense.
What makes the most sense is that the voting machines were programmed to flip just so many votes so as to not set off any alarm bells. Sorry, you are not going to convince me that the criminals - Valerie Jarrett, Axelrod, Plouff, Messina, and Cutter, didn´t have a maniacal master plan. First they had to show the polls as being very close and could go either way. When it went to Obama, no one would think too much about it - just that Romney fought the good fight but couldn´t convince enough voters to toss out Obama.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
krause, 11/12/2012 8:03:58 AM (No. 9008453)
I think a lot of registered republicans went independent in recent years after getting fed up with the party. Also, they could lose more after this election no small part to the robo calls that hit my phone 8-10 times a day.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
TunnelRat, 11/12/2012 8:12:24 AM (No. 9008462)
I live in a totally Democrat enclave. I often feel my trip to the polls is completely wasted, because I am outnumbered 20 to 1.
When I voted early this year, I noticed that nearly half of all the voters in line were black -- no shortage of enthusiasm here.
The dozens of political phone calls I received each day were enough to make me want to unplug my land-line (as several of my friends have). There is something about receiving a plethora of such calls that tends to dull any interest in voting.
While I was eventually convinced to vote for Mr. Romney (after repeatedly swearing I would not), there may well have been many potential Republican voters who simply were unable to pull the lever for a New England moderate.
Lotsa reasons -- none of them good...
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
jackie, 11/12/2012 8:15:12 AM (No. 9008465)
Until the Repubs decide to fix the voter fraud and the States go through the voter list and toss out the fake ones.. nothing will change. The States are the ones who have to fix the dang system and we need to get this early voting under control. Laziness should not be rewarded.. We get a big push about 90 days before the next election to make them look like they are doing something, but it is always too little too late with the Repubs. Now they want to drag out the sack clothes and ashes...Fools..
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Bevan, 11/12/2012 8:20:45 AM (No. 9008474)
The government plantation´s foundation was laid by Woodrow Wilson. The frame was erected by FDR. Clinton shingled the roof and Obama is providing the furnishings. To be fair, Bush I and II hung some drywall.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
tyshab, 11/12/2012 8:27:10 AM (No. 9008485)
It is not up to anyone else to fix the fraud. Why are we waiting on government and particularly political parties to fix this? It is our election process. Get your voter list, look up your property and tax rolls. Cross reference them, submit challenges to the ones who registered to vacant land, pay taxes but do not reside in the district, have died, are registered multiple times. Someone with the skills/talent could design and implement a process for cross referencing across districts and states to prevent the casting of multiple votes by one person. Read your states election law, volunteer to work the polls, be a poll watcher, run for secretary of state, board of elections, etc. Identify and work to change those areas of your state election law to remove the opportunity for fraud, i.e. early voting. Get your friends and neighbors registered. Educate them. Pick something, anything and move on it. Quit waiting for someone else to do it.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/12/2012 8:30:17 AM (No. 9008497)
There are maps that break down the red and green by smaller areas. It is just that a large city can outnumber a whole rural region and turn a whole state reliably democrat. There is something about people who flock into cities because they are less self reliant and inclined to depend on others. Population density co-relates with political attitudes.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Lt.Mom, 11/12/2012 8:31:48 AM (No. 9008502)
I don´t think Romney´s loss in Ohio and Pennsylvania was due to his Mormonism at all. I am a Christian who is very clear about the doctrines of my faith, but my husband and I had voting day circled and went to the polls together to vote for the straight Republican ticket here in PA. And, the results of voter turnout in our rural county, where we had poll watchers, was the one of the highest on record for Republican voters. I don´t believe we were an anomaly in PA.
I think this author was describing why we can write off CA and even NY, but that the results in OH and PA are suspect. And yes, it seems as though the article was truncated. Better check to be sure he is OK.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
stopevhillary, 11/12/2012 8:43:42 AM (No. 9008520)
And maybe some of them already went Galt. Before we did.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
dolphin, 11/12/2012 8:48:05 AM (No. 9008528)
I did not get even one robo call here in Kentucky. I saw no TV commercials. If Romney had one to one interviews anywhere on TV, I must have missed it. Did anybody come to my community? If they did, I missed it. If I hadn´t been making the effort to follow the election on FOX, I wouldn´t have known it was happening. This includes the primary. Combine this with people getting TOO many robocalls, add in the vote fraud and the leftwing litany in the popular media and you´ve got your 3 million.
Romney wasn´t my first choice and I DID vote even though I´m outnumbered 6 to 1 in my precinct. But I´m pretty motivated. I must confess I sat out the primary, though. What was the point?
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
pineledger, 11/12/2012 8:52:23 AM (No. 9008539)
Hard for me to imagine Romney´s religion had anything to do with his loss. If it did, why wasn´t Obama´s religion a factor?
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
NorthernDog, 11/12/2012 8:59:14 AM (No. 9008554)
I don´t buy the anti-Mormom idea either. Romney did better than McCain in almost every state (I think NJ and NY were the only states where ´O´ did better. In some counties in Oklahoma, not exactly a Mormom stronghold, Romney got 90% of the vote.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Avogadra, 11/12/2012 9:03:33 AM (No. 9008558)
There are articles all over the internet about how easy it is to change electronic votes and then have self-destruction of the code that did the changing. The Democrats didn´t have to do it in every district - just in certain key areas of the swing states.
All the tweaking of message and improvement of get-out-the-vote systems isn´t going to fix the problem if they can just switch our votes as soon as they are cast. And the evidence is, just from the fact that Obama can´t fill a venue anymore, they can manufacture exactly as many votes as they need to win any election they choose.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
MickTurn, 11/12/2012 9:04:04 AM (No. 9008559)
It is patently obvious that the Libs either stole votes or packed in more DIMS with voter Fraud...I guess we have to wait for the Dept of injustice to look into it...don´t hold your breath!
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
JAN, 11/12/2012 9:07:17 AM (No. 9008568)
Voter Fraud
The election was stolen
Stop buying into the msm mantra that we need to reach out hispanics, asians, etc etc etc.
R votes were discarded or went unscanned in republican districts in Florida, Coloraado, and in Ohio the scam was that absentee ballos were sent to every single registered voter.
Think about the chaos that ensued and you will see where the election was lost.
Kasich was asleep at the wheel in Ohio.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 11/12/2012 9:19:50 AM (No. 9008588)
The Democrat coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Asians, gays, illegals, and single women will be tough to beat even if we succeed in ferreting out all the voter fraud (including the abuse of early voting and vote by mail). Women in particular seem to be locked in on the primacy of lady parts issues above everything else. Big government has become their baby daddy. And when it comes to government, for them, size matters.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
O.G.´s Mom, 11/12/2012 9:34:12 AM (No. 9008626)
I absolutely agree with those posters that say electronic voting can be changed without anyone knowing it. Just program every 1,000th vote let´s say, to change to Obama in those key swing states. And we saw evidence of that with people voting early saying they voted for Romney but it changed to Obama.
As long as the MSM couldn´t care less about voter fraud because it happens to Republicans, and as long as our Republican so-called "leadership" is unwilling to confront this issue head on for fear of being labeled crazies, then we will have more coups as we have seen in this election. I believe more than ever this election was stolen. Every pollster was wrong? Seasoned, experienced pollsters ALL used the wrong premises about voter turnout? All pollsters whose reputations and livelihoods are at stake, made these same mistakes? I don´t think so. This election was stolen, pure and simple.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Arby, 11/12/2012 9:39:07 AM (No. 9008640)
I agree re: the robo calls. We have to find a new way to campaign that doesn´t involve annoying the voter.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 11/12/2012 9:41:20 AM (No. 9008651)
Databases voted in swing states vs humans. Also in Ca. where they needed the tax increase to pass, as an example of our future.
The entire voting system needs to be tossed & replaced. I´m all for purple thumbprints!
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
AGGW, 11/12/2012 9:42:59 AM (No. 9008654)
The fix was in before the first debate. 0 wasn´t worried.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/12/2012 9:45:38 AM (No. 9008661)
I have bad news for all the ladies voting with their lady parts. Because of the Grizwold v Connecticut decision the right to Abortion is locked in and Romney could not have changed that even if he wanted to - and he never showed any inclination to do so. You elected a closet Muslim who caters to CAIR a muslim group which has the declared purpose of replacing the constitution with Sharia Law. Do you think that will never happen? Obama is shredding the constitution every day and having the CAIR gang over for Ramadan parties all the time. I would rate this far more likely than any restriction on "reproductive freedom" If you keep this up your lady parts may well be subjected to FGM...which is not a pleasant experience. You can read all about it in the book "Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali. I have no sympathy for an Obama supporter when this happens but I do have sympathy for many others who will suffer the same consequences despite their heroic efforts to prevent this tragedy.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
uno, 11/12/2012 9:56:22 AM (No. 9008698)
The massive rallies where enthusiastic people showed up in droves for Romney belies the myth of the missing three million Republicans! It´s all about the voter fraud!
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 11/12/2012 9:59:39 AM (No. 9008709)
As Newt points out in one of his excellent You Tube pieces:" You can send $5,000.00 from L.A. to Bangkok without fear of it being stolen with just a few keystrokes and a security code".
The Vote could be equally secure but the left won´t let it happen and the right is too limp wristed to fight about it.
.....spit.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 11/12/2012 9:59:46 AM (No. 9008710)
Once upon a crime, a mysterious character from seemingly out of nowhere was elected our President. Four years later, the same character was reelected. Crime doesn’t pay? Tell me about it!
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
sickened, 11/12/2012 10:02:05 AM (No. 9008715)
Referring to New Mexico´s blue voter rolls, I´d like to remind outsiders that New Mexico voted twice for a Republican Governor, Gary Johnson, who ran as a fiscal conservative (balanced the budget and used his veto more than 700 times), and a social liberal (backed marijuana legalization and openly supported gay marriage). He also got a million votes against socialist Obama and fiscal moderate, social conservative Romney.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
unklebeau, 11/12/2012 10:12:52 AM (No. 9008752)
#25, its a big if, but IF Sharia law were to be put in place of the constitution, those women who voted with their "lady parts" are gonna be wishing they had their short skirts and opportunity back when the burquas are issued out!
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Catherine, 11/12/2012 10:13:17 AM (No. 9008753)
I just checked. MSNBC called the election for Obama at 8:15 - because of the Ohio vote. So 8:15 p.m. in Ohio is 7:15 in the CST states, 6:15 further west and in California, it was 5:15, yet it was called for Obama. Am I alone in trying to figure this out!
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
K.I.S.S., 11/12/2012 10:20:10 AM (No. 9008768)
ya think????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
oniana5, 11/12/2012 10:37:26 AM (No. 9008814)
Perhaps in 2016 the Republican party could think about giving us an actual pro life conservative candidate????
Or we could follow Hannity´s lead and "change our minds" on illegal immigration?
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
sadc, 11/12/2012 10:59:21 AM (No. 9008864)
We live in Cincinnati OH. Most of the southwest corner of OH went to Romney except for Cincy itself and the neighborhoods closest to it. We had friends who worked at the polls. No picture ID is required. If you have a photo, fine, if not, an electric bill will do. A tall, well dressed black man came in with no photo ID. No license? No ID? But his electric bill with the name Veronica was produced as ID and he had to be allowed to vote. No one can convince me that the early voting, the busloads of Somali residents, from Columbus, all citizens? - not speaking English, who were bussed in to vote did not constitute voter fraud.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
tisHimself, 11/12/2012 11:00:10 AM (No. 9008868)
The nominee demonstrated in the primaries an inability to connect with voters in big ten states.
Here´s a hint: in 2008, the person independent voters in those states connected with wasn´t McCain.
And yet, where the Tea party was strongest, in Midwest battle ground states, the RNC chose to act as if 2010 never happened.
Money and organization win primaries; sincere conservative convictions well articulated and presented win independents.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
forward, 11/12/2012 11:02:17 AM (No. 9008876)
I totally agree about those electronic touch screens. How can anyone audit them after the fact, there´s nothing but digital code. 111010010 101010100 101010101 is not an audit trail! Electronic scanned ballot images are much more accurate and can be audited. That is what my district used in upstate NY. Simple, clean, and there is a trail.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
fljack, 11/12/2012 11:16:50 AM (No. 9008910)
Far to easy to fool electronic voting. #37 is right. With no audit trail except to tally the number of people who signed the registry against the number of whole ballots cast, I could easily enter a program to ignore votes for Romney without the need to bump up Obeyme´s votes. It would just look like I didn´t vote for President. Who could tell?
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
William1, 11/12/2012 11:21:17 AM (No. 9008916)
One thing we may need to guard against is the use of the "stab in the back" mythology, which the Germans adopted to explain their defeat in WWI. We can, if not careful, be beguiled into thinking this because the theft theory provides a degree of comfort. I believe the bitter truth is that we are living in a tattooed, unthinking and illiterate culture, which values ignorance under the guise of sophistication, and indifference as the hip cynicism for these folks.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
gpau, 11/12/2012 11:22:38 AM (No. 9008919)
"Master Plan to Steal an Election", at www.brushfires-of-freedom.com/steal-an-election.html
The truth is right in front of us. What will we do about it?
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
ebuilder, 11/12/2012 11:39:35 AM (No. 9008959)
If they could control the results with undetectable massive voter fraud in every swing state -- then why can´t they do it in 2014 and 2016. If they can control the results from now on -- why is no one saying they have overthrown-the-country? Shh. They have overthrown the country. Shh.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Speedypetey, 11/12/2012 11:49:12 AM (No. 9008974)
Glad to see Allen West fighting the fraud. Just take Ohio as an example. The lines were around the block in small communities like Defiance and Van Wert. The exit polls were huge for Romney. Then the results came back and surprise but the President had precincts that exits were dominate the other way. Something is really evil.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
M2, 11/12/2012 12:00:10 PM (No. 9008995)
Lucianne´s caption under the MUST READ is exactly right. In NC where I live, I personally know of people whose votes via machine registered as votes for Obama when they voted for Romney. One friend said she tried 3x on the same machine with a poll-attendant watching as her vote flipped to Obama. She said the poll attendant said to "use another machine while we check this one out". Right.
Multiply that all over the country, prepared in advance thanks to ACORN workers and other since O´s last election and you have a simple answer to why Romney lost. Too many voters simply assumed the machine cast their vote for Romney when it did no such thing.
OPEN LETTER TO GOP: Why don´t you ask people who had similar experiences to contact you? Or contact the ACLJ or some other heavy-duty advocacy group? Do we just allow this election to get stolen?
Something is starting to smell really, really bad. It´s just too outlandish that we lost in those States when the stats were going our way.
And then, ponder this: From the moment O was elected in ´08, preparations to steal the ´12 election began. That´s a LOT of time to fix machines, ballots, etc.
We´ve been had. Big-time.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
gwmcclintok, 11/12/2012 12:25:03 PM (No. 9009035)
If Obama had lost with these same numbers, the election would be in the courts for a recount. May you republican leaders rot.............
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/12/2012 12:28:27 PM (No. 9009041)
The hated international observers were surprised at the lack of controls for voter fraud. Where is Jimmah Carter when you need him?
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
redink, 11/12/2012 12:35:50 PM (No. 9009056)
Voter fraud has been around since voting. Our last free election was, I believe, 2004. Spongebob voting in 08´ was just a preview to this election. When I heard that Romney votes were being flipped for Obama in early voting, I knew we were in deep trouble.
What I don´t understand is why Romney and the GOP did NOT implement a strategy beforehand to put some daylight in those voting areas where fraud did the most damage. They could have done something, they had the resources and the power to stop this. Brietbart was everywhere...why didn´t they use him? Where were the hidden cameras, the attorneys? the police? The republic did their duty...everyone turned out and WITH enthusiasm. There is no explanation other than fraud.
That the ignorant and greedy wanted more of Obama, there is no doubt they voted. But I do not for one second believe they outnumbered those who´s lives and livelihoods were at stake.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
jerseytomato, 11/12/2012 12:56:56 PM (No. 9009105)
As I recall Nancy Pelosi seemed a little too confident when she said, ´Mitt Romney will never be elected as President of the United States.´
Maybe for the first time she was actually telling us the truth.
#24 nails it.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
get er done, 11/12/2012 12:57:50 PM (No. 9009114)
The evidence of fraud should be presented to the members of the Electoral College. If the Romney pledged members withhold their vote, that would show the invalidity of this fraudulent election. I doubt that leftist members give a damn, however, not all are pledged to vote for 0.
The Congress still has to validate the election. For starters, Allen West should stand in Congress and object to Congress validating the Electoral College vote and present the Congress with evidence of the fraud in Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania and other states.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
ocjim, 11/12/2012 1:06:15 PM (No. 9009131)
The very determined Allen West has noticed irregularities in the Florida vote, especially in one of his counties. I hope he stays on this like a junkyard dog. I put absolutely nothing beyond the Dems and Obama Inc to do to win an election. Obama´s electoral history shows his preference to eliminate opponents before his elections, but if his work needs to be done during the election, so be it, IMO. Ironically, in Russia of all places, on that hot mike, he spoke so confidently to Medvedev of his coming victory. He knew he had it in the bag.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
pigop, 11/12/2012 1:12:14 PM (No. 9009143)
When Mitt was reportedly shellshocked at the result that he lost, you can tell he knew he´d been had. When is the GOP going to learn to fight dirty! I even managed to convert my liberal leaning young adult kids to vote for Romney and it didn´t matter.
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
ocjim, 11/12/2012 1:16:05 PM (No. 9009149)
#49 (cont.) We must return to... Election Day! - Paper ballots - No machines - Minimal, absolutely necessary absentee voting - No Early Voting. Early voting allows the Dems to work it like Card Check, working their lists, turning disinterested and uniformed voters into actual voters.
I am never troubled by low voter turn out which often happens in local elections. I figure those with the knowledge and the interest are voting.
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
geoguy, 11/12/2012 1:55:05 PM (No. 9009239)
This doesn´t make sense. The Republican Party/Conservatives were highly, highly motivated. Look at the difference in the crowds between huge Romney rallies in Ohio and Penn. vs small 0bama rallies, even with the likes of Stevie Wonder, in the waning days of the campaign. The college age kids were bummed out and showed no motivation to go vote much less vote for 0bama.
Now we are told that the Republican turn out was less than in 2008? No f´ing way. This is screwy.
Then I read that something like 100+ precincts in Ohio were >99% for 0bama and I heard there were similar results in Philadelphia. No fraud here. /s
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
belwhatter, 11/12/2012 2:02:36 PM (No. 9009260)
I believe the country should have a unified method of voting. Whichever system is least prone to fraud should be refined and adopted nation wide. Many seem to think the paper ballot with its paper trail is the right way to go. I also beleive the precious gift of the vote is wasted on a large percentage of woefully ignorant people. Why not mandate a simple intelligence test of political awareness? It is essential that a voter speaks and understands English. Voter ID is imperative. No same day voter registration or provisional voting allowed. Registration cut off date a minimum of six weeks before election day. No early voting anywhere except from our servicemen and women posted abroad. Lastly I believe the Republican party is no longer worthy of being the alternative to the Socialists.They need to get out of the way and let the reformers take the reins.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
Bla Bla, 11/12/2012 2:07:54 PM (No. 9009276)
fta: results in several states do raise eyebrows, most notably Ohio and Pennsylvania. Romney received nearly 100,000 fewer votes than McCain in the former and 35,000 fewer votes in the latter. In all the other battleground states, Romney improved...
That is enough to launch a Federal investigation into these two states & Florida. Somebody needs to step up with a class-action law suit. Who will do it? Will our House of Representatives do it for us? Somebody -- who? How? Lets git ´er done!
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
Up2Here, 11/12/2012 2:11:43 PM (No. 9009288)
#8 - And they used RINO Moving and Storage for all their needs.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
cgood, 11/12/2012 3:46:37 PM (No. 9009461)
I´ve been pointing to the fraud since Black Wednesday. Here´s a quick way to jumpstart the investigation: Donald Trump can offer a hefty reward for evidence of voter fraud. The Donald gets himself back in the headlines and we get the confirmation we need. Win/win.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
LZK, 11/12/2012 4:45:37 PM (No. 9009553)
Here in Chicago -- many complaints were heard about the machine changing the vote from President Romney to obama. I had to double check mine....
Soooooooooo -- it will follow that obama won by fraud. Surprise -- surprise....
LZK
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 11/12/2012 6:16:24 PM (No. 9009714)
It doesn´t make sense. In 2008 I walked in and voted. This election I waited 3 1/2 hours to vote.
You voted for one reason: you either hated Zippy or loved him. It had nothing to do with religion. No one in my area said anything about Mitt being a Mormon.
The real question is why is the Rep Party not up in arms about possible voter fraud ?
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
obviousity, 11/12/2012 7:04:45 PM (No. 9009803)
They do not count the absentee ballots unless the margin is less than the number absentee ballots in the opinion of they.
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
deusvolt, 11/12/2012 7:41:21 PM (No. 9009859)
To amplify the sentiments of poster #46, and similar posts, I´m forced to paraphrase a classic observation attributed to Sir Edmund Burke: all that is needed for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing.
jav
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
WimeTarmerFable, 11/12/2012 8:23:41 PM (No. 9009925)
The machines we use don´t even show who you voted for. It is also a waste of paper, the old voting machines were tamper resistant and easy to use. This is fraud institutionalized...
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
Yephora, 11/12/2012 8:35:44 PM (No. 9009950)
When they ´lost´ thousands of military ballots the GOPutzes did nothing.
When proof of voter registration fraud was surfacing all over the country the GOPutzes did nothing.
When Repub poll watchers were intimidated, threatened, kicked out the GOPutzes did nothing.
When voting machines flipped Romney votes to 0bama the GOPutzes did nothing.
Finally when the inevitable happened last Tuesday, the GOPutzes conceded and began pandering, compromising and caving to 0bama´s total agenda.
We´re doomed.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Obama signals retreat in the fight against terrorism
|
|
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:23:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama delivered an address today at the National Defense University called “The Future of our Fight Against Terrorism.” Actually, part of the speech was about the past, including much self-congratulation and some shots at President Bush. This part of the speech is revisionist rubbish. As Max Boot explains: Obama said, for example, that after he came into office, “we unequivocally banned torture, affirmed our commitment to civilian courts, worked to align our policies with the rule of law, and expanded our consultations with Congress.” Umm, actually all of that happened in Bush’s second term.
|
Obama’s Speech: Hamlet as Wartime Leader
|
|
National Review Online, by Bing West
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:19:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In seventy lugubrious paragraphs, President Obama today asked America whether as commander-in-chief he should bomb terrorists. He concluded that sometimes he should, and sometimes he shouldn’t. He couldn’t quite make up his mind. Therefore, he would appoint a panel to advise him. Mr. Obama has already authorized more than 200 such drone bombings. His staff has bragged that before ordering a bombing, he personally reviews who lives and who dies. Imagine if Prime Minister Churchill or President Truman had appeared on television to announce an advisory panel before bombing our enemy. We would be appalled
|
Cars, people in the Skagit River after I-5 Bridge collapse
|
|
KOMO-TV [Seattle, WA], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:15:26 PM
Post Reply
|
|
MOUNT VERNON, Wash. -- The Interstate 5 bridge over the Skagit River collapsed Thursday evening, injuring an unknown number of people. Both the northbound and southbound portions of the bridge dropped into the river sometime before 7 p.m., according to Washington State Patrol trooper Mark Francis. Francis said several cars were on the bridge when it collapsed, and some are now in the water. Bart Treece with the Washington State Department of Transportation was unsure when the bridge was last inspected. "All of our bridges in the area are pretty old," he said.
|
Fox News’s Roger Ailes responds to Justice Dept. investigation
|
|
Washington Post, by Erik Wemple
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:00:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Fox News chief Roger Ailes has sent a memo to his subordinates at the leading cable news network. He sent this memo to his staff today in connection with the federal investigation into an alleged leak to Fox News reporter James Rosen, a story that the Washington Post’s Ann E. Marimow broke earlier this week. The memo’s a masterpiece, too. For all those who wonder what it is about Ailes that endears his people to him — and that makes him such a good interviewee for any media reporter lucky enough to get an audience
|
Anthony Weiner says Houston psychiatric facility made him ‘a new man’
|
|
Houston Chronicle, by Nicole Narea
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:52:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Anthony Weiner’s New York mayoral candidacy was only made more improbable today after he revealed that he visited a Houston psychiatric facility following his resignation from Congress in 2011. Haunted by scandal surrounding his sexually explicit online communications with women, the Democratic former congressman sought treatment for his compulsive behavior from mental health professionals at the Gabbard Center. According to its website, the facility provides “3-day outpatient psychiatric evaluation,” particularly to “professionals who are in personal or professional crises.” While Weiner did not disclose
|
Arrests of 2 in British soldier’s slaughter signal wider Islamist terror plot
|
|
Washington Times, by Peter Carvill and Ruby Russell
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:44:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
LONDON — British police late Thursday arrested a man and a woman in connection with the butchering of a British soldier on a London street, as anti-Muslim protests sprang up across the country. The arrests fueled speculation that the gruesome knife attack Wednesday — the first successful terrorist act in Britain since 2005 — was part of a wider plot, and prompted questions about the prevalence of Islamic extremism in the country and how to combat it. British officials moved quickly to increase security in London and other major cities Thursday as police raided
|
Answers on IRS only raise more questions and calls for a special investigation
|
|
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:41:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Three days of hearings have shown that IRS scrutiny of conservative organizations extended beyond a few rogue employees in Cincinnati, that the agency staged its announcement of the bad news to try to limit the damage, and that the White House knew more, and knew it earlier, than it first admitted. Republicans argue that they also uncovered evidence that the auditor’s report could have been completed months ago — even before the November elections. They also said an internal IRS investigation confirmed the untoward behavior as early as July 2012.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Lois Lerner´s Brief And Awful Day On Capitol Hill
|
|
NPR, by Frank James
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 10:21:38 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The public got its first look Thursday at Lois Lerner, who has gone from faceless IRS bureaucrat to the face that launched what feels like 1,000 congressional hearings and conspiracy theories. But it was only a brief sighting since she didn´t stay long at a House hearing to further probe her role in how some IRS workers came to target conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status. (Snip)She did make a short statement to declare her innocence, however. Lerner´s motivation was more transparent than much of what the IRS has done in connection with this controversy. She was determined to
|
Criminality Appears To Lie at the Heart of the IRS Scandal
|
|
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.
|
Eva Longoria graduates with master´s degree in Chicano studies
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: NorthernDog- 5/23/2013 3:03:53 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Eva Longoria is backing up her beauty with a whole lot of brain. The actress graduated with a master´s degree Wednesday. Longoria, 38, took home a real degree (not an honorary one) in Chicano studies from Cal State Northridge, where she physically attended classes for three years, according to TMZ. "Big day today!!! Very excited to graduate for my master´s degree in Chicano studies! You´re never too old or too busy to continue your education!" the actress wrote on her Who Say site Wednesday, sharing loads of pics of her big day, posing with her family, cohorts and diploma.
|
Obama nominates Nuland for assistant secretary of state
|
|
Politico, by Reid J. Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 10:08:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama on Thursday nominated Victoria Nuland, a State Department official involved in the editing of the administration´s talking points on Benghazi, to be the next assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs. Nuland, a career foreign service officer who was until recently State´s top spokesperson, had long been expected to be nominated the post to replace Philip Gordon, who Obama picked to serve as Middle East coordinator for the National Security Council. Nuland´s nomination -- which requires Senate confirmation -- could come under scrutiny from Republicans who see her as playing a central role in shaping
|
Why was the Department of Homeland Security monitoring Tea Party IRS demonstrations?
|
|
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state
|
Mark Levin Tears Into Obama: ‘Flat- Out, Bald-Faced Lie’ That He Knew Nothing About IRS Targeting
|
|
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 9:48:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Conservative radio host Mark Levin is very skeptical of the idea that President Obama had absolutely no idea about the IRS tea party targeting before the story broke in the news mere weeks ago. Levin declared adamantly that it is a “flat-out, bald-faced lie” that Obama didn’t know beforehand, citing prior reports by a few conservative news outlets picking up on the news well before the 2012 presidential election. Levin said, “I don’t believe for two seconds that Obama wasn’t aware of this.”
|
Anthony Weiner says Houston psychiatric facility made him ‘a new man’
|
|
Houston Chronicle, by Nicole Narea
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:52:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Anthony Weiner’s New York mayoral candidacy was only made more improbable today after he revealed that he visited a Houston psychiatric facility following his resignation from Congress in 2011. Haunted by scandal surrounding his sexually explicit online communications with women, the Democratic former congressman sought treatment for his compulsive behavior from mental health professionals at the Gabbard Center. According to its website, the facility provides “3-day outpatient psychiatric evaluation,” particularly to “professionals who are in personal or professional crises.” While Weiner did not disclose
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|