|
|
| |
Topic: Obamacare Is Still Vulnerable |
Obamacare Is Still Vulnerable
National Review, by Michael F. Cannon
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:f64, 11/10/2012 8:48:13 AM
|
| President Obama has won reelection, and his administration has asked state officials to decide by Friday, November 16, whether their state will create one of Obamacare’s health-insurance “exchanges.” States also have to decide whether to implement the law’s massive expansion of Medicaid. The correct answer to both questions remains a resounding no. State-created exchanges mean higher taxes, fewer jobs, and less protection of religious freedom. States are better off defaulting to a federal exchange. The Medicaid expansion is likewise too costly and risky a proposition.
|
Comments: The author offers 13 reasons not to set up state exchanges, all excellent. Too bad no one will listen.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
rational, 11/10/2012 8:49:29 AM (No. 9004753)
hardee har har har with GOP "leaders" like ours????
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Kanzan, 11/10/2012 9:04:35 AM (No. 9004787)
Kansas won´t participate, thanks to Governor Brownback. He did offer a very clever caveat: if any legislator wants to introduce a bill to join and fund an exchange, go ahead...make the voters´ day. Just this one thing is doing a lot for our morale this week!
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Alynnmcw, 11/10/2012 9:06:20 AM (No. 9004791)
We have 30 republican governors. I pray in the name of all that is holy that all of them refuse the state exchange option. We may end up with 50 democrat governors but it seems worth doing. We have yo use every advantage Ploy and dirty trick we know to resist. Heck if the French can have a resistance I know Texas can. How about the other 29?
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 11/10/2012 9:31:14 AM (No. 9004848)
In the meantime, all health insurance rates are skyrocketing. Our company´s rates just went up 26%. And that´s after last year´s increase of 18%. This is Obama´s poison pill strategy.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 11/10/2012 9:36:28 AM (No. 9004861)
You people disappoint me. President Zero wants the feds to run the exchanges - that´s why the fallback mechanism was in the law. This plays into his hands. Do not forget that he said, about 10 years ago, that we had to have a single payer system, but that there would be some intermediate changes before we got there. Once the feds run the exchanges, and expand medicaid, single payer is just a short trip ahead.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
lylacat, 11/10/2012 9:59:43 AM (No. 9004929)
0bamacare is a horrid piece of legislation. Why isn´t anyone asking 0bama why he and his family are exempt from this wretched mess? The democrats who passed this law are also exempt, along with their families, from having to use this horrid healthcare; why do you think that is? This healthcare bill is full of many new taxes for all of us; every time you sell a piece of property, you wil pay 0bama 4%, he lies when he says you can choose your own doctor. There is a provision in the 0bamacare that helps to pay for union pensions; how does that relate to healthcare? Did anyone read this horrid piece of legislation, and why is there not more outrage?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
thenightowl, 11/10/2012 1:12:47 PM (No. 9005337)
What we need is legislation that exempts no one from the trojan-horse healthcare bill, government, unions, etc. Let the equal really be equal, not privileged v. individual. Why should the general population tax payers have to pay for the elitists´ entitlement healthcare?
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
WIBadger, 11/10/2012 1:47:29 PM (No. 9005404)
As of right now anyway, Scott Walker isn´t moving forward with this here in WI. Lets hope that holds up.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "f64"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "f64"
|
GOP Senator: We Are the Party of the 47 Percent
|
|
National Journal, by Michael Catalini
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: f64- 1/27/2013 11:11:22 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Freshman Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas on Saturday chided the GOP over its 2012 electoral losses, saying "Republicans are and should be the party of the 47 percent," a clear allusion to the remarks caught on video by presidential candidate Mitt Romney during the campaign. Cruz, speaking at the National Review Institute summit in Washington, was quick to say he wasn´t criticizing Romney, but that the party lost a messaging battle with the electorate and that comment was just a symptom of the problem.
|
´I Am Adam Lanza´s Mother´: A Mom´s Perspective On The Mental Illness Conversation In America
|
|
Blue Review, by Liza Long
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: f64- 12/16/2012 11:09:34 AM
Post Reply
|
Three days before 20 year-old Adam Lanza killed his mother, then opened fire on a classroom full of Connecticut kindergartners, my 13-year old son Michael (name changed) missed his bus because he was wearing the wrong color pants. (Snip) I live with a son who is mentally ill. I love my son. But he terrifies me. A few weeks ago, Michael pulled a knife and threatened to kill me (Snip)His 7 and 9 year old siblings knew the safety plan -- they ran to the car and locked the doors This very important blog is posted with special permission of staff.
|
|
Beware the Goodists
|
|
Jewish World Review, by Jonathan Rosenblum
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: f64- 11/28/2012 10:52:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of the working papers for the recent Jewish People Policy international conference, entitled "Jewish Identity and Identification: New Patterns, Meanings, and Network´s," posed the question whether the Jewish community´s altered material and political circumstance "entail a long-term shift from identification with the have-nots to identification with the haves." (Snip)But their implicit characterization of the divide between political liberalism and conservatism as one between good people who care about those less fortunate than themselves and bad people who don´t strikes me as highly tendentious.
|
| |
|
|
Obamacare Is Still Vulnerable
|
|
National Review, by Michael F. Cannon
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: f64- 11/10/2012 8:48:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama has won reelection, and his administration has asked state officials to decide by Friday, November 16, whether their state will create one of Obamacare’s health-insurance “exchanges.” States also have to decide whether to implement the law’s massive expansion of Medicaid. The correct answer to both questions remains a resounding no. State-created exchanges mean higher taxes, fewer jobs, and less protection of religious freedom. States are better off defaulting to a federal exchange. The Medicaid expansion is likewise too costly and risky a proposition.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
| |
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
| | |
|
|