|
|
| |
Topic: TSA grabs union contract |
TSA grabs union contract
Washington Times, by Editorial
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/9/2012 9:56:10 PM
|
| When Congress decided to take over airport security, it was never about safety. That became clear on Friday when Transportation Security Administration (TSA) screeners formally agreed to a contract that will add 45,000 dues-paying members to the ranks of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE). This public-sector union forces members to hand over between $14 and $16 out of each paycheck, meaning the organization stands to collect as much as $16 million each year. This money will help turn out the vote for Democratic candidates and subsidize a number of liberal causes.
|
Comments:
Isn't this just wonderful. s/ This never should have been allowed to happen.
|
 
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Sanspeur, 11/9/2012 10:05:22 PM (No. 9004104)
Color moi surprised/s!
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 11/9/2012 10:09:34 PM (No. 9004110)
The biggest problem with collective bargaining for these employees is that it will tie the hands of management on transfers, and make it really difficult to terminate an employee. (see U.S. Postal Service)
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
veritas, 11/9/2012 10:34:18 PM (No. 9004144)
Wow. I never -- I mean never -- saw that coming! Me too, #1. Me too.
"Publi employee unions" -- half the quality, twice the cost, four times the benefits. And no recourse.
Remember, some 40% of gov´t school teachers send their kids to private schools.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Aria, 11/9/2012 11:31:21 PM (No. 9004247)
Health care workers next. Make sure you don´t have an emergency when they are taking a break or their shift is over.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 11/9/2012 11:35:56 PM (No. 9004256)
It was not too long ago that many of these people were minimum wage flunkies, cleaning toilets and mopping floors of the very airports in which they are now strutting around. Just look at these Federal drones and realize the size of the salaries they will end up with and the fat pensions. RIP America. We are so screwed.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
LadyHen, 11/9/2012 11:52:33 PM (No. 9004277)
Add this to a recent poll showing a full 1/3 of respondents would have no issue with mandatory body cavity searches in order to fly if it was deemed necessary by authorities. Yes, so in order to fly a unionized government paid rent a cop can stick his/her fingers into your backside and other orifices should Big Sis deem it necessary. Legalized sodomy and rape via governmental sanction.
Welcome to Obama´s America!!
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
lylacat, 11/10/2012 12:04:07 AM (No. 9004287)
Fire the TSA. This organization does not make us safer. They are an overpaid lot of ignorant and arrogant morons.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 11/10/2012 2:45:07 AM (No. 9004399)
The country we love operates likes a one party nation now.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 11/10/2012 3:46:41 AM (No. 9004417)
#8, no, more like a banana republic.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 11/10/2012 10:09:54 AM (No. 9004954)
Remember that the TSA is the Transportation Security Administration. Also remember that "transportation" isn´t limited to the airlines. Here´s the statement from TSA Administrator John Pistole (from the TSA website):
“The completion of today’s agreement between TSA and AFGE is a milestone in our relationship with our workforce and AFGE," said TSA Administrator John S. Pistole. “Together, we will continue to secure our nation´s transportation systems and keep the traveling public safe.”
"secure our nation´s transportations SYSTEMS".......I believe that the TSA is now part of 0bama´s "National Civilian Security Force". Will TSA agents also be issued those hollow-point bullets 0bama bought?
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rumblehog, 11/10/2012 11:36:35 AM (No. 9005177)
Thank you Sen. John McCain for EVER even suggesting this moronic bureaucracy be created after 9-11. The contract screening agencies were NEVER found to have done anything wrong in that incident. They acted under Federal rules to the letter. It was the rules and the "firewall" that were at fault! Sure, they put language in the charter that the TSE could NOT unionize, then guess what? They changed the law!
This Federal government is becoming the problem, bigtime. Bureaucrats can destroy any American industry, including airlines, with the stroke of a pen. This was never meant to be. It´s time for the American States to fight back and return America to a Constitutional Republic and not a Democrat controlled Tyranny!
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl, 11/10/2012 6:09:31 PM (No. 9005905)
I don´t think government employees can be required to join a union - they are members of a bargaining unit, and the union must represent them, but they don´t have to join the union. I worked in a Federal facility that voted in a union, and while several hundred people voted in favor, only 15-20 actually joined the union. it has been that way in every unionized Federal facility where I´ve worked.
|
| |
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
BuzzFeed’s Anburajan: Ted Cruz a
‘LINO’ — ‘Latino in Name Only’
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:20:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In a post on her Twitter account, Buzzfeed Director of Partnership Development Aswini Anburajan took a swipe at Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz’s ethnicity, calling him a “LINO,” or a “latino in name only.” Anburajan, who is also a contributor to WNYC’s “It’s a Free Country” blog, the website for the New York City NPR affiliate, also knocked Cruz’s presidential aspirations for his opposition to giving undocumented immigrants government benefits : “Ted Cruz is a LINO ‘latino in name only’ good luck w/ prez aspirations w/ that stand on undoc immig and benefits”
|
Outgoing IRS Chief: IRS Targeted
Conservatives to ‘Be More Efficient’
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:11:34 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Outgoing IRS Commissioner Steven Miller told a Senate committee Tuesday that the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups was not partisan, but merely “foolish mistakes” made by employees trying to be “more efficient.” “I do not believe that partisanship motivated the people who engaged in the practices described in the Treasury Inspector General’s report,” Miller said in his opening statement before the Senate Finance Committee. “I reviewed the Treasury Inspector General’s report and I believe its conclusions are consistent with that.” “I think that what happened here was that foolish mistakes were
|
Krauthammer On IRS Scandal:
"This Is Going To Go On
And It Could Be Fatal"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:01:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Here´s why this has legs: Number one, as Kirsten says, everybody is outraged. Everybody knows what the IRA can do, and everybody´s afraid of it. Second, because you now have somebody that´s going to plead the Fifth, in a court of law, the jury is not supposed to interpret that as hiding something, but this isn´t a court of law, and we aren´t a jury. Clearly there´s something happening here. Everybody understands there is a red flag. And last is the fact who was a member of Congress who was just up there? That was the
|
Carney Likens Questions About
Scandals To Birth Certificate
Controversy
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 7:57:08 PM
Post Reply
|
|
MAJOR GARRETT, CBS NEWS: On Sunday, Dan Pfeiffer said that one thing Republicans do when they lack an agenda is try -- I’m quoting him directly -- “try to drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.” Can you describe what he’s talking about? JAY CARNEY, WHITE HOUSE: I think we have a history here already for the past several years of attempts by Republicans to politicize matters -- GARRETT: Is there anything that´s -- an issue now fall into that category in your opinion -- in the White House’s opinion?
|
| |
|
Fraud, security concerns as
approval rate for ´dreamers´
hits 99 percent
|
|
Fox News, by Judson Berger
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 7:48:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Illegal immigrants seeking a reprieve under an election-year program implemented by the Obama administration are being approved at a rate of over 99 percent -- a situation that has the immigration officer union raising concerns about fraud and security risks. The program in question is called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which allows some illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children to seek tentative legal status. It was the administration´s answer to the "Dream Act," a bill Congress drafted but did not approve. The union representing thousands of employees in U.S. Citizenship and
|
Jay Carney Insists Obama Comfortable
With Learning About IRS Scandal
From News Rather Than Advisors
|
|
Mediaite, by Noah Rothman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 7:37:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
White House Press Sec. Jay Carney told reporters on Tuesday at the daily press briefing that President Barack Obama was not upset with his closest advisors who chose not to inform him of the brewing scandal surrounding the Internal Revenue Service’s systemic targeting of conservative groups. Carney said that the president would not have been able to comment on the Inspector General’s ongoing investigation into the IRS’s abuses and was not upset over being kept out of the loop. “I wasn’t present when he learned about it, but I know that he
|
Benghazi Suspects ID’d, But
Administration Won’t Nab
Them Because It Doesn’t Want
to Send Them to Gitmo
|
|
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 7:24:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Despite the fact that the Obama administration regularly strike at terrorists with lethal drone hits in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, the White House is reportedly not rounding up five suspects identified in the Benghazi attack because of a lack of evidence to try them in civilian court. The Associated Press cites officials who said there is enough evidence to seize the men as enemy combatants and send them to Guantanamo Bay. But apparently the Obama administration wants civilian trials for anyone involved in the Benghazi attack and has sent the FBI back to collect more evidence, which
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
| |
|
Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care
|
| | |
|
|
