A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: What the editorial boards are
saying about Obama's future
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
What the editorial boards are
saying about Obama's future

Los Angeles Times, by Alexandra Le Tellier

Original Article

Posted By:Drive, 11/8/2012 8:03:21 AM

Editorial boards across the nation weighed in with their endorsements for president in the weeks leading up to the Nov. 6 election. The Opinion L.A. blog rounded up a few of these political endorsements to show the range in support for President Obama versus the enthusiasm for Republican challenger Mitt Romney. Now that the election is finally -- mercifully! -- over and Obama has won reelection, here’s a look at what many of those editorial boards were saying Wednesday.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Axeman, 11/8/2012 8:14:18 AM     (No. 8998896)

From LAT? I don't want to puke. I need some lib to read it and then not tell me about it.


Reply 2 - Posted by: CEP, 11/8/2012 8:24:45 AM     (No. 8998925)

Start out with the premise of blaming Bush, I.e. problems of 2008, it would seem to me they want cover for the disaster of the next four years. Obama couldn't overcome what those republicans did to wreck the economy.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: FlyRight, 11/8/2012 8:33:25 AM     (No. 8998958)

This is a round-up of what other editorial boards are saying, not just the LA Times.Closed minds don't learn anything.


Reply 4 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 11/8/2012 10:03:07 AM     (No. 8999227)

Not one of these 'papers' is dealing in reality. Obama hates the Congress; won't work within our Constitutional framework; will continue to act outside the law in an Imperial Presidency. Will any of these 'papers' stand up to him in a second term? No.


Reply 5 - Posted by: gam, 11/8/2012 10:19:51 AM     (No. 8999295)

He might as well send Congress home and save the expense to spend on Michelle's vacations and the next $4750/a plate state dinner. He overrides any Congressional legislation and hands power to his czars. Thesse editorial boards live in LaLaLAnd. Deals don't make it happen. What deal is going to hold in the Middle East. I expect our intelligence community to lose man of their agents as they figure out that they will be left out to die as in Benghazi. America is toast.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Persecutor2, 11/8/2012 10:31:12 AM     (No. 8999349)

Interesting read--seems to me like the papers that endorsed 0 (with the exception of the NYT, of course) actually scold him more than the papers that endorsed Romney. The ones that endorsed Romney, OTOH, seem to be more completely buying into the fantasy that 0 can emerge as some kind of practical, non-partisan, centrist bridge-builder. They all make the mistake of thinking/saying that Americans as a whole want the two parties to stop fighting and work together to solve the big issues. I don't see it that way at all, I see two Americas with vastly different visions that cannot be reconciled. Neither wants their side to give in to the other. All this biz about "coming together to slove the nation's problems" strikes me as Pollyanna-ish blather.


Reply 7 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 11/8/2012 10:42:29 AM     (No. 8999390)

Agree w/ #6. Only the LAT points out that his negative and hugely expensive campaign with a narrow win will handicap him.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: lalo, 11/8/2012 10:42:48 AM     (No. 8999392)

#6 I agree, and your post reminds me of Boehner, appro of which - is pie-throwing illegal? He would be the prime candidate in my book.

As for the LAT, #1 - there are worse papers; they do allow a certain amount of good stuff & truth to slip through.


Reply 9 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 11/8/2012 11:31:06 AM     (No. 8999542)

The next democrat nominee in 2016 will also blame Bush by saying the economy was so bad that even Obama couldn`t fix it after 8 years in office.

I think we are in for a long run of democrat president`s. Who does the GOP have that can contend? Big Media now dictates who wins the WH.



Post Reply   Close thread 711206




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"



A loving father, an Afghan hero
and a fine soldier: Face of ´Riggers´
the innocent drummer, 25, ´butchered
on street by Muslim fanatics
Daily Mail (UK), by Rob Cooper*    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/23/2013 1:29:24 PM     Post Reply
The murdered British soldier executed by two Islamist fanatics was tonight named as Lee Rigby. The 25-year-old ´cheeky and humorous´ serviceman - described as a ´loving father´ to his two-year-old son Jack - was identified as police guarded his home in Middleton, Greater Manchester. Drummer Rigby, a keen football fan who followed Manchester United FC, was just starting his Army career and had recently fought in Afghanistan with the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers.

IRS emails: Who knew
what, and when?
Cincinatti/Gannett Media, by James Pilcher    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/23/2013 11:30:55 AM     Post Reply
New emails between Internal Revenue Service officials released Wednesday as part of congressional testimony give a better view of who knew of the screening of conservative tea party groups and the search terms being used, and when they knew it. The documents also show a bit of the process the IRS used in such situations, but do not answer the question at the heart of the controversy – who made the decision to search for such groups and why. The string of emails is from early June 2011, sparked by a request from Holly Paz,

   

 



 
Tensions Brew Inside White
House Over Counsel’s Role
Buzzfeed, by Evan McMorris-Santoro    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/23/2013 7:37:02 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — As they watched President Obama lumber into controversy over mandating contraception coverage last winter, some White House staffers were banging their heads against the wall. The lawyers had done it again. Tensions between operatives and the lawyers hired to protect them from legal trouble are a constant in politics. But as President Obama’s beleaguered aides look for someone to blame in an escalating series of scandals, former political, communications, and policy officials complained to BuzzFeed that one culprit is a balance that has tilted too far toward the lawyer, allowing avoidable controversies to boil over.

Sal: Squeeze Weiner
for cost of election
New York Post, by David Seifman    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/22/2013 1:01:19 PM     Post Reply
With Anthony Weiner about to pop into the race for mayor, one of his Democratic rivals demanded yesterday that he pony up $350,000 for the cost of the election required to fill his hastily vacated congressional seat two years ago. Weiner resigned under pressure in June 2011 after it was disclosed he was tweeting lewd pictures of himself to women he’d met on the Internet. In the special election held that September to replace him, Republican Bob Turner pulled off a stunning upset victory over Democrat David Weprin. Taxpayers were stuck with the $350,000 election tab,

Fox News poll: Obama ratings dip,
voters say government ´out of control´
Fox News, by Dana Blanton    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/22/2013 12:53:01 PM     Post Reply
After a week of revelations about government spying on reporters and the Internal Revenue Service targeting conservatives, most voters feel “like the federal government has gotten out of control and is threatening the basic civil liberties of Americans.” At the same time, a new Fox News poll finds disapproval of President Obama’s job performance is above 50 percent for the first time in a year, his honesty rating is at a new low and half of voters already think he’s a lame-duck.

N.Y. Times editorial board:
Obama administration
threatening press freedom
Politico, by Dylan Byers    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/22/2013 8:31:26 AM     Post Reply
The New York Times editorial board has condemned the Obama administration for threatening press freedom in the wake of revelations that the Justice Dept. seized phone records belonging to Fox News reporter James Rosen. "With the decision to label a Fox News television reporter a possible ´co-conspirator´ in a criminal investigation of a news leak, the Obama administration has moved beyond protecting government secrets to threatening fundamental freedoms of the press to gather news," the board wrote in an editorial published on Wednesday. Noting past Obama administration intrustions into press freedom, including the Justice Dept.´s

Oversight from Washington, All Along
National Review Online, by Eliana Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/22/2013 7:35:44 AM     Post Reply
From the outset, Internal Revenue Service lawyers based in Washington, D.C., provided important guidance on the handling of tea-party groups’ applications for tax-exempt status, according to both IRS sources and the inspector general’s report released in mid May. Officials in the Technical Unit of the IRS’s Rulings and Agreements office played an integral role in determining how the targeted applications were treated, provided general guidelines to Cincinnati case workers, briefed other agency employees on the status of the special cases, and reviewed all those intrusive requests demanding “more information” from tea-party groups.

   

 

  


 


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
75 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
55 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

51 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Criminality Appears To Lie at the
Heart of the IRS Scandal

49 replie(s)
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM     Post Reply
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

   

 



 
Lois Lerner´s Brief And
Awful Day On Capitol Hill

47 replie(s)
NPR, by Frank James    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 10:21:38 PM     Post Reply
The public got its first look Thursday at Lois Lerner, who has gone from faceless IRS bureaucrat to the face that launched what feels like 1,000 congressional hearings and conspiracy theories. But it was only a brief sighting since she didn´t stay long at a House hearing to further probe her role in how some IRS workers came to target conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status. (Snip)She did make a short statement to declare her innocence, however. Lerner´s motivation was more transparent than much of what the IRS has done in connection with this controversy. She was determined to

Why was the Department
of Homeland Security monitoring
Tea Party IRS demonstrations?

43 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM     Post Reply
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state

   

Post Reply   Close thread 711206





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~