A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Rush Limbaugh: ‘I Went To
Bed Last Night Thinking
We’ve Lost The Country’
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Rush Limbaugh: ‘I Went To
Bed Last Night Thinking
We’ve Lost The Country’

Mediaite, by Noah Rothman

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/7/2012 2:52:31 PM

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh offered a dire prognosis for the Republican party following last night’s defeat of GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney. Limbaugh said that it is difficult for any candidate to run a successful campaign against “Santa Claus.” He went on to say that his last thought as he went to bed on election night was the Republican party had “lost the country.” Limbaugh said that he thought Romney and his family would have been great for the nation, but his recipe for a turnaround – hard work – is no longer accepted by

Comments:
Rush has always been optimistic in the worst of times. He sure wasn't today.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: brianod1, 11/7/2012 2:55:34 PM     (No. 8997164)

I went online to look up 2012 election numbers in Illinois, where Obama’s vote total dropped by 506,556 from 2008. In Chicago and Cook County alone they dropped by 193,736. The problem is that Romney surpassed McCain’s totals by only 56,378 statewide. This baffles me. This means that 450,000 or so voters who voted for Obama in 2008 just disappeared and did not vote for Romney. Those 450,000 voters were nowhere near enough to turn Illinois, but where in the heck did they go?


Reply 2 - Posted by: Galtoid, 11/7/2012 2:55:50 PM     (No. 8997166)

Wish he would spend less time doing commercials during his on-air time. Those spots are getting very, very annoying. One other thought: Rush has been out of touch for about ten years now. He didn't have any idea how bad the entitlement culture has become until last night. The Libs have succeeded, and to add insult to injury, he didn't tell us it was time to panic. He is now panicking. We should be too.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Emmajustin, 11/7/2012 2:58:19 PM     (No. 8997176)

#1 the voters didn't disappear. It was that ACORN was fully functioning back then and so many dead people and fictional characters voted in 08.
I think it is worse that folks voted for the idiot boy than that they stole the election.
Either way of course we are *_(*)*)_(*.


Reply 4 - Posted by: TXknitter, 11/7/2012 2:58:23 PM     (No. 8997177)

Well, when you have been on the front lines of American conservatism fighting for as long as he has, it's understandable that sunny optimism was hard to find this morning.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Italiano, 11/7/2012 2:59:10 PM     (No. 8997181)

Rush also claimed that conservatism didn't lose last night. I'm not sure that I follow that one.


Reply 6 - Posted by: fritzilou, 11/7/2012 3:03:24 PM     (No. 8997193)

We wil wake up one day to the realization that we have lost our most precious gift; the freedom to decide for ourselves about our own lives.


Reply 7 - Posted by: CEP, 11/7/2012 3:08:13 PM     (No. 8997208)

#2 and #5 Nobody realized just how bad the entitlement mentality had become, also Conservatism didn't lose but mentality of free stuff won.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: jackson, 11/7/2012 3:17:48 PM     (No. 8997257)

Last night just confirmed the state of our ongoing slide, less religious, fat, stupid, tattooed, with illigitamacy at 40%, gay marriage fatigue, addicted to damn cellphone nonsense, sports performed by dirty, dreadlocked steroid-bloated freaks. We celebrate entertainment and shun hard work.
Our country is not loved beacause it is now unlovable.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Redneck In NY, 11/7/2012 3:18:44 PM     (No. 8997262)

Read the comments after this artcile at Mediaite. That is what we are up against. You CANNOT sway that type of hate with Love of Country. The libs have won, it took them 50 years of indoctrination, but they finally did it.

Propaganda works folks.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Galtoid, 11/7/2012 3:21:51 PM     (No. 8997274)

This wake-up call has come too late. It is over as far as how we view traditional America. Over. PFFFT.


Reply 11 - Posted by: caljeepgirl, 11/7/2012 3:26:11 PM     (No. 8997286)

Me, too.


Reply 12 - Posted by: tfwg, 11/7/2012 3:27:53 PM     (No. 8997291)

WHEN ARE WE GOING TO STOP LISTENING TO THIS MAN? GW Bush wanted to pass immigration reform and this guy killed it. He is a loud mouth who does not have ANY RESPONSIBILITY!

Question: why should Rush pay less tax on this stock trades than those who WORK for thier money? And please don't tell me rush is creating jobs!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Vaquero45, 11/7/2012 3:28:57 PM     (No. 8997296)

Conservatism didn't lose last night. it wasn't even in the race, except for maybe Paul Ryan. Let's try conservatism next time. Stop trying to pander to Mexicans and blacks, Jews and homosexuals, unwed mothers and welfare scum. Nominate a conservative candidate who will not compromise. When we run as ourselves, we do better. Wa can't do any worse.....


Reply 14 - Posted by: rubberneck, 11/7/2012 3:34:14 PM     (No. 8997307)

Santa Claus?!!?

Barry is Robin Hood!!!

/sarcasm


Reply 15 - Posted by: choey, 11/7/2012 3:38:36 PM     (No. 8997323)

Rush stated very specifically on one of his shows that he does not trade stocks or invest in the stock market. He didn't say what he does invest in if anything.
If you don't like what stock traders pay in taxes then talk to congress. The traders are just following the law.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Amicus Veritatis, 11/7/2012 3:39:06 PM     (No. 8997324)

"Thinking we've lost the country." Yep, we have, only it happened sometime over the last four years and we never noticed just when that tipping point was reached. He's not the only one who was terribly surprised last night.


Reply 17 - Posted by: lzboy, 11/7/2012 3:51:29 PM     (No. 8997359)

#12 no one is forcing you to listen.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Wetlandz, 11/7/2012 3:55:58 PM     (No. 8997376)

Boortz the only talking head on our side that got it right and he's gone in 30 days.

Rush isn't optimistic he's trying to keep us optimistic but its too late.


Reply 19 - Posted by: oldsfc, 11/7/2012 3:59:43 PM     (No. 8997389)

And Karl Rove still has a job? Maybe McCain can save the party.


Reply 20 - Posted by: NancyD, 11/7/2012 4:00:13 PM     (No. 8997394)

#12, because he knows how to spell "their"?

Rush is a voice of reason in a very backwards world. He's for self-reliance not handouts, hard work not takers. He's anti-socialism.


Reply 21 - Posted by: judy, 11/7/2012 4:12:23 PM     (No. 8997457)

We have lost our great country. I have a tear in my eye...I'm very sad..


Reply 22 - Posted by: attorneyforfreedom, 11/7/2012 4:16:43 PM     (No. 8997468)

#8, couldn't agree more. I am a criminal defense attorney and you just described my entire clientele


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: KsGirl101, 11/7/2012 4:27:06 PM     (No. 8997501)

I got to listen to bits and pieces of Rush today. I started out terribly angry at him for feeding us a false optimism. (God, I hate being lied to)...but as I listened to him I realized he was asking aloud the same questions I was asking.
How do the Republicans attract minorities? Answer is, we don't. We don't have anything to give them that the dems haven't already given them. All the Repubs have to offer is a chance at productive, satisfying work with personally earned success. No way that beats the free stuff the dems have to give. As long as it lasts. Then this country will be torn apart with blood and thunder and there won't be an America, the shining city on the hill. What an unimaginable loss.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Galtoid, 11/7/2012 4:39:16 PM     (No. 8997549)

Republicans can't compete with Obamaphones, foodstamps, disability, welfare without work. What they can offer is something very old fashioned and diminishing: Pride and Dignity.


Reply 25 - Posted by: mominNoCA, 11/7/2012 4:40:29 PM     (No. 8997557)

#1,

Maybe they went back to their graves.


Reply 26 - Posted by: formerlyphelps, 11/7/2012 4:48:41 PM     (No. 8997595)

Some of this grows wearisome: Let’s all attack Rush for being optimistic! Now let’s attack Rush for NOT being optimistic!

Conservatism is not an easy sell to natural born socialists. To this point, there really has not been any hard price to pay for the expanding dependency class. People are willing to pay $4/gallon for gas if they get EIC in return. It’s only when there is no gas that people get upset. The “fiscal cliff” is nothing but a scare tactic that will never actually happen. If it does, Congress will raise the debt ceiling and move on, because USA is too big to fail. $16T in debt is such an incomprehensible number that it literally has no meaning at all. No one could pay such a sum, and it’s clear that no one intends to.

That’s the mentality at work. There are very few adults left, so by all means pounce on the messenger.


Reply 27 - Posted by: jimboendaatl, 11/7/2012 4:53:17 PM     (No. 8997619)

I think the silent majority has finally become the minority. It took a while for the left to accomplish this goal...50 plus years now but I'm afraid they have finally succeeded. God help us all.


Reply 28 - Posted by: HisHandmaiden, 11/7/2012 5:03:46 PM     (No. 8997669)

#12, Rush pays less tax on dividends [not trades] because he's already paid [highest!] tax on the income.


Reply 29 - Posted by: tonyl, 11/7/2012 5:53:23 PM     (No. 8997817)

I don't see anyway out of this mess in the future. The left has built their voting base and it's here to say. Good night to the America I grew up in.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Sherlock, 11/7/2012 6:20:30 PM     (No. 8997906)

Had we won the senate, the freak with the purple lips could have been stopped in some of his destruction...we did get that lucky. There are a lot of very smart people on our side WHY can we never come up with a plan to counteract those on the left? We talk everything to death and never get anything done. We need to get loud and demand to be noticed


Reply 31 - Posted by: Sherlock, 11/7/2012 6:21:48 PM     (No. 8997907)

We did (not) get that lucky


Reply 32 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 11/7/2012 6:24:19 PM     (No. 8997917)

I don't care what anyone says, many of these polls were rigged by incredibly long early voting, voting with no I.D., electronic machines that magically default select the Dem candidate, etc., etc.

After the 2010 THUMPING the Dems took, I can't believe that that many abandoned fiscal responsibility to reward the biggest debt spender in human history. There are just TOO many things not adding up here. I'm waiting for someone at the voting machine companies to come forward and admit they rigged the election, South American style.


Reply 33 - Posted by: philemon1967, 11/7/2012 6:28:33 PM     (No. 8997930)

Don't give up!

Obama won because the Takers outnumbered the Makers in 2012. And this will not change until Takers run out of other people's money. They need to get to rock bottom before they learn that they are not entitled to the reward of people's efforts.

For the health of the body politic, I say it is time to go Galt to save America.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Envirodude, 11/7/2012 6:57:21 PM     (No. 8997997)

The republicans will have gone the way of the buggy whip makers within 20 years


Reply 35 - Posted by: Pocket Aces, 11/7/2012 8:18:34 PM     (No. 8998173)

#12

Neither Rush, Warren Buffet or any other investor should pay any more than a moderate capital gains tax on INVESTMENT INCOME!

You see, for it to be investment income you would have to, at some previous time, have earned it and paid the full tax rate on it. AS EARNINGS.

If you try to tax investment income at a 35% you end up discouraging investments in our country.


Reply 36 - Posted by: Grant Hodges, 11/7/2012 10:44:06 PM     (No. 8998438)

12,28, and 35:
The misrepresentation of capital gains as regular income is demagoguery. Lying. Of course, the media loves it. It's just their game. Obama loves it. love the feel of the lie as he tells it right out in front of God and everybody knowing he has thousands of followers and media worshipers to repeat the lie over and over, and act holier than thou against anyone who points out that capital gains investments have already been taxed.


Reply 37 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 11/7/2012 11:50:22 PM     (No. 8998510)

Amen, #18!!!


Reply 38 - Posted by: Malia2012, 11/8/2012 5:57:20 PM     (No. 9000611)

Amen #32. Also #17 is right. No one is forcing anyone to listen to Rush Limbaugh. Most of the ultra-leftist-talking-heads are no longer on the air but that's no excuse to accuse Rush Limbaugh of "escaping taxes". BTW, Conservatives do not think that way. And YES, he DOES employ many people in his businesses.



Post Reply   Close thread 711145




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Colorado sheriffs seek to
block new gun restrictions,
file lawsuit against state
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM     Post Reply
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations

´We could lose everything´: Tea
Party groups prepare to sue IRS
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.

First Lady Expands Anti-
Obesity Campaign to Museums
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community

Congressman: IRS asked pro-
life group about ´the content
of their prayers´
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM     Post Reply
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although

Treasury Knew of I.R.S.
Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,

HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t
Employees More Time for ´Planning
and Preparing Healthy Meals´
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM     Post Reply
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.

Will real villains in IRS
scandal ever be punished?
Fox News, by Juan Williams    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM     Post Reply
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

52 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

44 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

37 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.


Post Reply   Close thread 711145





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~