A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: O’Reilly Slams AP’s ‘Biased’
Romney Photo: Obama Benefiting
From Nonexistent ‘Fair’ Reporting
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
O’Reilly Slams AP’s ‘Biased’
Romney Photo: Obama Benefiting
From Nonexistent ‘Fair’ Reporting

Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 10/9/2012 9:49:36 PM

On his show Tuesday night, Bill O’Reilly took to his Talking Points segment to join in on criticism of the Associated Press’ recent photo of Mitt Romney (which made for jokes aplenty). Taking aim at the media in general, O’Reilly further chastised the AP and others for focusing on the outrage du jour instead of the battle between “capitalism and quasi-socialism.” (Snip) O’Reilly called the photo a “foolish shot” that makes Romney “the butt of stupid jokes. Pardon the pun.” It’s “a cheap shot,” he said. And clearly not the picture of objectivity.

Comments:
I know O'Reilly can be terribly annoying, but he really ripped on AP. Good for him. He continued to do so in the segment with Colmes and Crowley.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Safari Man, 10/9/2012 9:55:29 PM     (No. 8921770)

The little girl is collateral damage.


Reply 2 - Posted by: turninggrey, 10/9/2012 9:55:34 PM     (No. 8921771)

WHY are the cameraman, reporter and editor not being asked why they have embarrassed this little girl on the national scene? Why would a news organization think they could get away with this? I hope the family sues.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Janjan, 10/9/2012 10:18:42 PM     (No. 8921801)

O'Reilly went on to defend Obama's debate performance because he was clearly 'distracted'. This photo is beneath contempt and O'Reilly made a big deal out of it because he loves to hear himself talk and, oh yeah, he likes to look out for 'the folks'. I don't need this pompous ass looking out for me.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Mike PHX, 10/9/2012 10:23:19 PM     (No. 8921806)

One good thing about O'Reilly: exposure. How many people would have known of this outrageous attempt at propaganda by AP? They do it all the time. And most, ahem, "folks" just see it in their local papers every day.
Good for him on this one.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Linder, 10/9/2012 10:42:25 PM     (No. 8921840)

Like Bill but he irritates me when he talks over guests ... however, I appreciated his outrage over the AP picture.


Reply 6 - Posted by: wepeople, 10/9/2012 11:06:15 PM     (No. 8921883)

Let's not just leave it to O'reilly, why can't we be offended and tell AP of their moral corruption? info@ap.org I gave them an earfull and the photographer Evan Vucci who provided the shot.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 10/9/2012 11:26:05 PM     (No. 8921917)

I hope the little girl's parents complain. Thanks for the address, #6.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: EQKimball, 10/10/2012 12:10:14 AM     (No. 8921983)

From time to time--including this occasion--it would be interesting to put three top national editors in a room and give them a story, or, in this case a picture. The editors would not be told who uttered the alleged gaffe, or, in this case, whose posterior the little girl is ostensibly looking at--only that there is a 50% chance it could be either candidate. Then the editors could decide whether they would run the story or print the photo. Having majored in journalism, I am confident the editors would make an objective and fair decision. In this case, not knowing which candidate was the "butt of the joke," they would unanimously determine that the picture was in poor taste and unfair and would, uh, can it, so to speak. In other words, they know--as all journalists know--what is biased, what is fair, what is objective, what is tasteless. But today's editors and reporters do not care, and will argue contrary to their own training and logic, if the, uh, end justifies the means.


Reply 9 - Posted by: beca, 10/10/2012 7:36:06 AM     (No. 8922305)

bill only talks over guests Like colmes when they are spinning out of control.....the most honest reporting always comes from oreilly.....always



Post Reply   Close thread 705917




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Brit Hume: ‘Chilling’ Search Of
Fox Reporter Shows DOJ Treats
‘Ordinary News Gathering As Crime’
Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:24:38 PM     Post Reply
Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume had strong words to describe the news that his colleague James Rosen was subject to a federal leak investigation, telling America’s Newsroom that the story may indicate that the Obama Justice Department wants to treat ordinary news-gathering activities as a crime. As we reported earlier this morning, Fox News’ chief Washington correspondent Rosen was investigated in 2009 after being suspected by Justice of receiving secret information from government sources on North Korea. As part of their investigation, Justice tracked his movements within the State Department, traced the timing

Ron Paul: Fix IRS by shutting
it ‘once and for all’
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:14:53 PM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Ron Paul of Texas called the recent IRS fiasco troubling — but writes that the only way Congress can protect the freedoms of Americans from a long pattern of suspected IRS abuse is to “shutter the doors” of the agency “once and for all.” The longtime GOP congressman writes that IRS agents in the 1930s were essentially “hit squads” against opponents of the New Deal, and that allegations of IRS abuse spanned the administrations of Presidents Kennedy, Nixon, Clinton and George W. Bush. “The bipartisan tradition of using the IRS as a tool to harass political opponents

   

 



 
If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

A guide for journalists (and everyone
else) to avoid government snoops
Fox News, by John R. Quain    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 12:55:59 PM     Post Reply
Revelations that the Department of Justice has been secretly spying on Associated Press reporters has given rise to accusations of intimidation tactics and apparent attempts to stifle whistle-blowers and a free press. It should also ring alarm bells for anyone concerned about their own privacy and freedom. The U.S. garners the No. 32 spot when it comes to press freedom, according to Reporters Without Borders, and the latest snooping scandal raises the specter of the bad old days (circa 1972) when reporters resorted to ridiculous clandestine machinations to communicate with secret sources. During the Watergate investigation,

Team Obama digs in, fights to get
agenda on track amid scandals
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Niall Stanage    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 12:23:58 PM     Post Reply
The White House is circling the wagons as one of the most feverish periods of President Obama’s tenure enters its second week. Obama and his aides have taken a more aggressive stance in recent days after fumbling their initial response to headline-grabbing scandals at different government agencies. The administration’s strategy is centered on a simple defense: “Our basic thrust is that nobody, here, did anything wrong,” an Obama administration official told The Hill. “That’s why none of this is going to stick.” Even though there is no evidence yet of wrongdoing in the White House,

Bloomberg Uses Commencement Speech
to Push Gun Control, Rail Against
‘Extremist’ NRA
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 12:00:02 PM     Post Reply
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg used a commencement speech to push his gun-control agenda, telling graduates of Kenyon College in Ohio that gun control is “something you really should think about.” Bloomberg, who co-chairs Mayors Against Illegal Guns, spent at least $14 million in support of legislation that would have required universal background checks for all gun-buyers. Although the bill died in the Senate on April 17, Bloomberg said the battle isn´t over. “I believe we will win, sooner or later, because I believe that all of you, your generation more than any other at least

Welcome Back to
the Future, Hillary
Atlantic Magazine, by Elspeth Reeve    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 11:48:10 AM     Post Reply
Now that Hillary Clinton no longer has a nonpartisan badass day job, the universe is reverting back to its natural state in which Clinton is a controversial figure with a complicated past and more than a few enemies as well as the symbol of some people´s anxieties about women in power. The excuses to engage in the old Hillary Clinton narratives today come in the form of a biopic titled Rodham, which shows the former secretary of state´s early relationship with Bill Clinton in a not totally flattering light, and a report on her 2008 campaign aides by

   

 

  


 


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

59 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

59 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

   

 



 
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

   

Post Reply   Close thread 705917





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~