|
|
| |
Topic: Romney will keep Obama's immigration policy |
Romney will keep Obama's immigration policy
CBS News, by Leigh Ann Caldwell
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:ClangClang, 10/3/2012 12:09:16 AM
|
| Mitt Romney softened his stance on one of President Obama's immigration directives allowing certain undocumented immigrant youth to stay in the U.S. legally. In an interview with The Denver Post Monday, Romney said he would not reverse an executive order issued by President Obama that would allow children of illegal immigrants to obtain a visa, permitting them to live and work in the U.S. legally for two years, if they meet certain criteria. "The people who have received the special visa that the president has put in place, which is a two-year visa, should expect that the visa
|
Comments: Romney just lost my vote for good. And most likely hundreds of thousands of others who consider out-of-control immigration to be the defining issue of our age.
At this stage of a campaign, at the very least a candidate should know who his supporters are. The cheap labor lobby may donate lots of cash, but they don't post lots of votes. Romney doesn't seem to have a clue who his voting base is.
I wish the open borders radicals luck with four more years of Obama. They'll need it.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Bubbasuncle, 10/3/2012 12:19:19 AM (No. 8905877)
Sorry that something from CBS could sway you so easily OP, a real Romney supporter would at least wait for a credible explanation.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
4Justice, 10/3/2012 12:21:03 AM (No. 8905879)
I guess OP would much rather have another 4 years (which could turn into a lifetime position) of dictator Obama instead. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Safari Man, 10/3/2012 12:21:45 AM (No. 8905880)
This is exactly why Obama did this move... to try to paint Romney into a no-win corner. Seems like OP doesn't appreciate the bind this has put Romney in. I don't like it either, but letting Obama win is not a great way to stop the madness.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Lucyloo, 10/3/2012 12:24:15 AM (No. 8905883)
I'd say someone's clangers are defective. I wouldn't jump the gun on this considering the source. Plus at this point anyone claiming to be conservative and not voting for Romney is akin to a traitor, in my view.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
trapper, 10/3/2012 12:29:32 AM (No. 8905891)
So some kids get to keep their visas for a couple years. So what? This is small potatoes in the whole immigration mess. Sure, it was pure political pandering by Obama, and probably illegal to boot. And I was angry when he did it. But Romney's right. Just fix the whole thing and take care of this in the process. Get to it when we get to it. Solve the big problems rather than run around playing whack-a-mole with details.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
horacer, 10/3/2012 12:36:19 AM (No. 8905896)
It's less of a logistical headache to let them play out. He's not renewing them. OP if not for this you'd find some other reason to not vote for Romney. I've known your type since I was a kid.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Cleanhousein2012, 10/3/2012 12:38:21 AM (No. 8905900)
Actually, Romney should have only one executive order during his presidency should he manage to win... And at is an EO that blanket overturns all of zippy's EOs.
Nothing more or less. And yes, I am unwilling to compromise.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
ClangClang, 10/3/2012 12:58:14 AM (No. 8905917)
The faster Obama destroys the country the better. A stacked Supreme court, completely open borders, healthcare nationalization, confiscatory taxation and institutionalized affirmative action where your children will be shut out of any real chance of a prosperous future.
I say if the GOP doesn't understand who its constituents are, then let the radicals who control the party have at it and when the smoke clears, we will, at the very least, never go down this path again.
I'm not going to contribute to the slow death of a Republic that my ancestors died fighting for. After 19 illegal aliens murdered thousands of our people, you would thing we'd wake up. And after the installation of a police state because of Muslim immigration, you'd think we'd wake up. And after an economic meltdown largely brought on by affirmative action lending to immigrants and their children, you'd think we'd wake up.
So I say, no one can sleep for that long, so it must be you really want Obama. Well now you've got him.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Safari Man, 10/3/2012 1:05:35 AM (No. 8905921)
#8 I doubt it will collapse very fast under any conditions. The libs are boiling this frog slowly. The USSR took 70 years to finally collapse.
Personally, I am going to hold out hope for Romney and then possibly Ryan after that. If Obama wins, my life is too short to fight it any more. I have been saving/preparing for the possible disappointment and I will start to look for other countries to live in. The trajectory we're on is not a good one.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
ZurichMike, 10/3/2012 1:07:15 AM (No. 8905923)
Yes, let's stick to perfection as being the bar for your vote -- you'll end up like the GOP in California, watching from the sidelines as things come crashing down and Democrats are reelected over and over again.
Jesus Christ is not running for President, and I think it's safe to say a Romney presidency would be much, much better for the country than an Obama presidency.
Rome wasn't built, destroyed, or rebuilt in a day (or a term).
Not voting for Romney = another vote for Obama. Think about that.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
danu, 10/3/2012 1:13:39 AM (No. 8905925)
With all due respect CC, I want immigration enforcement as well, but this [reported] MR position is not in accord w/ his other statements on the subject.
Therefore, I'm inclined to wait and review the whole on this topic.
There is also a difference, imho, between a President who must be guided and kept honest by the will of the People, and a [self-styled] substance-abusing... kleptocrat ...who listens to no one and respects no law.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
geoman, 10/3/2012 1:14:38 AM (No. 8905927)
I cut the OP some slack. Someone being fed up with the entire political process is understandable. I'm voting for Romney while not being a "true Romney supporter" either. I'm a Conservative and Romney is more conservative than Obama. By his campaign conduct alone, including quotes that appear in the article, Romney appears to be slightly to the left of GW, whom I like but never considered even being close to Reagan's conservative ideological bent. Still, I hope he wins and has a largely conservative congress that can spend its time undoing Obama era legislation rather than layering on new.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 10/3/2012 1:35:00 AM (No. 8905937)
You don't know what you're wishing for OP. Yes, illegal immigration is a major threat, but we've got a whole row of threats lined up to deal with.
It's nice to claim ideological perfection, but not voting for Romney will certainly help Obama. So do you want to risk your country's fiscal collapse, while you complain about something a MSM purveyor is pushing and we don't even know to be true?
A fiscal collapse won't be pretty. I hope you've got your wheelbarrow ready to carry your money around in, and have ample supplies, and a way to protect them when the hordes come after them.
Unless you're really on Obama's side, and trying to demoralize the rest of us.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
PChristopher, 10/3/2012 1:35:30 AM (No. 8905938)
When I saw it was from CBS, I figured it was pure disinformation but it will bear watching just in case.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 10/3/2012 1:46:31 AM (No. 8905941)
Nice headline, SeeBS. What do we expect from the "fake but accurate" news network?
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Attercliffe, 10/3/2012 1:46:53 AM (No. 8905942)
As a legal immigrant and now an American citizen I am appalled by any slackness on illegal immigration. However, there is no way I would vote against Romney in this election, nor would I sit at home, not voting for either candidate.
I'm a little suspicious of a new poster who tries to discourage Ldotters from voting for the conservative candidate.
It's not going to work.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
ClangClang, 10/3/2012 2:06:57 AM (No. 8905949)
I've been posting here since '98. Brought here by lying POS Clinton and the destruction he wrought, including open borders and the national climate we now call political correctness.
F purity. There's no such thing. There is always a mix of good and bad policy. But willful intent to destroy a people, we the people that built this country, that is an entirely different matter. Destruction, chaos and poverty. That's precisely what the open borders radicals of the GOP have brought to our country and I say F-em.
No one in the GOP leadership wants to acknowledge what these scam artists have done. Fair enough, the GOP has been co-opted and it's their ball-game now.
But I say I will not contribute to this madness and have had enough.
Four more years should be just enough to get the party started.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
KimoSaavy, 10/3/2012 2:10:29 AM (No. 8905950)
Don' sweat this. Wrong battle at this time. If I were Mitt, I would say more and more and more and more to get the latino vote. I am not suggesting lying, but once in office, he can work on real immigration reform. And the idea we are going to round up 25 million plus people and deport them is stupid. They need to be made US citizens for the right party. Latinos are conservative by nature like African Americans used to be in some respect. See how the dems are courting latino votes with lies and abandoning blacks. The other side is playing super dirty. No time for macainisms. Support Mitt. I think he is smarter than he looks.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Kurto, 10/3/2012 2:31:43 AM (No. 8905959)
People, this is about two-year visas, not amnesty. Please keep your pants on!
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
frenesi1, 10/3/2012 6:11:56 AM (No. 8906024)
Well, he will keep it until someone points out he must follow the law.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
JimS, 10/3/2012 6:36:49 AM (No. 8906049)
Grrrrr. Calm down, people. And if you can't calm down, then just shut up. Just because you get all cranked up that CBS News (a true paragon of truthful reporting!) would say that this is Romney's position, why would you believe it unless you saw Romney say it himself and in the proper context? Why would you immediately conclude "Romney lost my vote for good" and encourage other people to do the same? That is totally irresponsible. Clearly See-BS is living up to their name, and you are falling for it.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Rakasha, 10/3/2012 6:46:04 AM (No. 8906068)
Slightly off topic but, re 'I doubt it will collapse very fast... The USSR took 70 years to finally collapse.'
We started wading into this pool nearly 80 years ago with the Social Security Act (1935). If you count the toe-dipping in the early 1900's, I'd say we're about to go under.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
absalom, 10/3/2012 1:35:21 PM (No. 8906965)
Romney could have deflected this question w/a 'we'll see' answer but chose to give an answer that angered his core base. Amazing how this aw shucks doofus instinctively grasps defeat from the jaws of victory. Of course his hear no evil waterboys are just jake w/responses like this. Principled conservatives warned in vain about this guy from day one, as a loser w/o any core, who would surround himself w/like minded wool heads from the calcified DC progressive R establishment; but we were told to buzz off as he was a shoo in. Really? So be it.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "ClangClang"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "ClangClang"
|
Romney will keep Obama's immigration policy
|
|
CBS News, by Leigh Ann Caldwell
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ClangClang- 10/3/2012 12:09:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Mitt Romney softened his stance on one of President Obama's immigration directives allowing certain undocumented immigrant youth to stay in the U.S. legally. In an interview with The Denver Post Monday, Romney said he would not reverse an executive order issued by President Obama that would allow children of illegal immigrants to obtain a visa, permitting them to live and work in the U.S. legally for two years, if they meet certain criteria. "The people who have received the special visa that the president has put in place, which is a two-year visa, should expect that the visa
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner lost her rights
|
|
Politico, by Rachel Bade
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
All of Obama´s Scandals Are Ultimately About Information Control
|
|
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|