A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Pa. Court rules voters can
cast ballots without ID
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Pa. Court rules voters can
cast ballots without ID

Philadelphia Inquirer, by Angela Couloumbis

Original Article

Posted By:Calvinesq, 10/2/2012 10:43:48 AM

HARRISBURG - A Commonwealth Court judge ruled today that Pennsylvania's controversial new voter ID law can remain mostly intact for the November election, but will impose a very narrow injunction that will allow even those without identification to vote. In his ruling, which is widely expected to be appealed to the Supreme Court, Simpson ordered an injunction that would target the portion of the law that deals with provisional ballots. As written, the law said voters who do not bring proper photo ID on Election Day can cast a provisional ballot.

Comments:
As bad as this is, it can and still might get worse. Lieberals will never quit. The will appeal until they get full victory. Death by a thousand paper cuts.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: mgwitt, 10/2/2012 10:49:50 AM     (No. 8904064)

I really wonder if the Republicans will ever confront this issue even if they have the power after the election? Why is this even an issue? A constitutional law is in order. Let's see if any elected official has the ba**s to suggest it.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Malia2012, 10/2/2012 10:52:18 AM     (No. 8904070)

"Controversial new voter ID law"? If the "court" will allow those without ID to VOTE anyway, WHAT's the POINT? Judges on Courts like this one are the result when Republicans are too timid to fight against leftist-judges-for-life-candidates put on the Court by demonrats. God help this Country!


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: achingbackfarm, 10/2/2012 10:52:50 AM     (No. 8904072)

Pennsylvania always has been quite good at electing the best judges money can buy.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Michaelus, 10/2/2012 10:55:41 AM     (No. 8904083)

But what about the men who decide that they are really women who show up to vote looking not at all like the driver's license photo!?!?!?


Reply 5 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 10/2/2012 10:57:33 AM     (No. 8904086)

It is simply incredible that any rational person would object to user-friendly voter ID laws to prevent fraudulent voting unless they believed the latter benefited their cause. The response of the judiciary to this common sense measure has in many venues been disappointing - in fact, appalling.

The longer and louder Democrats object to reasonable voter ID the more obvious it appears that they simply do not desire to reduce voter fraud because they think they stand to lose if illegal voting is curtailed. The only other plausible explanation I can think of for Democrat opposition to voter ID would be that they think a substantial portion of their supporters are too lazy or mentally incompetent to take the simple steps required to obtain valid ID. Neither scenario speaks well for Democrats. They are not, of course, mutually exclusive.


Reply 6 - Posted by: lakerman1, 10/2/2012 11:02:44 AM     (No. 8904095)

I believe the two commonwealth court judges are in contempt of court. The Pa supreme court remanded with specific tasks for the commonwealth court to do.
This just kicks the can down the road. Whole lot of that with democrats, and some republicans...


Reply 7 - Posted by: snapper451, 10/2/2012 11:11:23 AM     (No. 8904112)

Just came from the doctor - had to show an id. They must be suppressing patients. This now opens the way for the emerging clone of Acorn to get to work. In the 2004 election a voting machine in the Philly area had 35,000 votes for John Kerry in it when the polls opened in the morning. This is the Democrat way(aka the Chicago way).


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Rotten In Denmark, 10/2/2012 11:12:07 AM     (No. 8904114)

As a Central PAer with little more than disdain for Philly for what it has become and seems to stand for, why haven't the wussy repubicrats (!) ever tried to clean-up the sewer that is Philly voting practices? I know why the RATS are happy---


Reply 9 - Posted by: L.A. Guy, 10/2/2012 11:12:29 AM     (No. 8904115)

This is what you get with Liberal UNION controlled Judges -- absolute corruption.


Reply 10 - Posted by: earlybird, 10/2/2012 11:18:24 AM     (No. 8904134)

This is sickening. Provisional ballots have been used for decades when a person shows up and is not on the registered list for a precinct.


Reply 11 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 10/2/2012 11:24:17 AM     (No. 8904149)

The real vote fraud won't take place at the polling places - it'll be via mail-in ballots.

Still, the judge isn't exactly Solomon here; why is voter ID acceptable for next year, and not now?


Reply 12 - Posted by: GoDeacs79, 10/2/2012 11:27:05 AM     (No. 8904154)

We have reached the point where the entire focus of the nation has turned to coddling the people who are too lazy to do the simplest tasks to function in a modern society. Every issue is centered around those who are bringing this country down, rather than the ones making it work and prosper. Before long the government will be sending out folks to wipe the butts of the "poor" who couldn't be expected to put out the effort on do it themselves.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: MickTurn, 10/2/2012 11:37:20 AM     (No. 8904172)

How special, another judge to impeach and remove from office!


Reply 14 - Posted by: usmc2489, 10/2/2012 11:43:13 AM     (No. 8904185)

I wonder if a picture ID was needed to get an ObamaPhone? Another question to ponder -- Who paid for the ObamaPhones???


Reply 15 - Posted by: Rotten In Denmark, 10/2/2012 11:56:10 AM     (No. 8904231)

hahahah usmc, we all did! Check your bill, there is a line I believe Federal Universal Service Charge. My monthly bill on cell is $1.77 plus house phone plus wifey's cell! Aren't we just the best folks on duh planet! s/o. I assume this is what is is for.....


Reply 16 - Posted by: rael, 10/2/2012 12:01:22 PM     (No. 8904246)

Why does this make me think that there is going to be MASSIVE voter fraud this election?


Reply 17 - Posted by: Mr. Know-It-All, 10/2/2012 12:06:23 PM     (No. 8904254)

Well that locks up PA's electoral votes for obumbler now.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: veritas, 10/2/2012 12:28:37 PM     (No. 8904323)

So, I guess buying alcohol without proving age is OK? Driving without a license is OK? Whoa -- flying a plane without a pilot's license? That one oughta draw some attention [to the smoking craters]. Prescribing drugs without an MD? How about arguing cases without passing the bar? [See Massachusetts for a recent precedent.] Sealing engineering drawings without a PE?

Well, Judgie-poo?


Reply 19 - Posted by: Blackeagle, 10/2/2012 12:56:39 PM     (No. 8904389)

Curious, what if a man shows up and requests a ballot belonging to a woman - say his mother - claiming to be that woman? Or is that an overreach - even for a Dem?


Reply 20 - Posted by: dman, 10/2/2012 1:27:22 PM     (No. 8904480)

Purple dye in the interim.


Reply 21 - Posted by: goose, 10/2/2012 1:30:57 PM     (No. 8904491)

Well, it looks like the vote count in Philadelphia can exceed the number of registered voters again.


Reply 22 - Posted by: philly_patriot, 10/2/2012 3:08:57 PM     (No. 8904749)

We anticipate massive voting fraud just like in 2008.

We will be as prepared a possible but I cannot but wonder why the decision came down today ........ enough time to get MORE fraudulent voter registrations in before the deadline next Monday at midnight.

Note
In 2008 an estimated 75% of the voter registrations turned in by Acorn were found to be fraudulent ..... We will never know how many were not identified and got through.

I have always said we need to get at least an additional 10-15% of the votes for a candidate to win an election here.

Amazingly the Justice Dept and D Judges are MORE interested in identifying ONE Single voter who might be denied the right to vote than side with the hundreds to thousands of REAL voters who's votes are regularly being negated by 'voting fraud'.


   

 



 

Post Reply   Close thread 704540




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Calvinesq"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Calvinesq"



Study: Dan Foster Types
More Likely to Be Conservatives
National Review Online, by Daniel Foster    Original Article
Posted By: Calvinesq- 5/16/2013 3:00:12 PM     Post Reply
From the Daily Mail: ”Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.” Researchers in Demark and California “collected data on bicep size, socio-economic status, and support for redistribution from hundreds of people in the United States, Argentina, and Denmark” and found that people with higher upper body strength are likelier to take a small-government approach, even controlling for wealth. The hypothesis is that physically stronger men were more assertive about their

Gosnell jury saw the truth
Philadelphia Daily News, by Christine M. Flowers    Original Article
Posted By: Calvinesq- 5/14/2013 11:41:35 AM     Post Reply
AND SO, what Jack McMahon audaciously called a racist prosecution, wherein a black man was being called to account for ending the lives of countless nameless black babies, has ended in a righteous verdict: guilty, guilty, and again, guilty. Three lives vindicated with three words, uttered after months of testimony and evidence that makes you want to turn your face away. But we looked, and we understood that here was madness and evil, not racism. Kermit Gosnell could now face the death penalty, something that has far-reaching repercussions

Report: Menendez accuser says
she made up story
Philadelphia Inquirer, by Jonathan Tamari    Original Article
Posted By: Calvinesq- 3/4/2013 7:50:31 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON -- One of the two women who videotaped allegations that New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez paid her for sex has said in an affidavit that she was paid to make the story up, according to a report Monday in the Washington Post. The woman also said she has never met nor seen the Democratic senator, the Post reported, citing court documents and two people briefed on her claim. Instead, in an affidavit she said she and a colleague were paid by a lawyer to make up the claims and read from a script, according to the Post.

Sepsis: A stealthy, sudden killer
Philadelphia Inquirer, by Bob Calandra    Original Article
Posted By: Calvinesq- 3/4/2013 3:10:05 PM     Post Reply
Dying is effortless. That became clear to me as I lay on a gurney in an emergency department bay at Penn Presbyterian Medical Center. It was 10 p.m., almost five hours since my primary-care physician Michael Cirigliano (better known as Dr. Mike from Fox29) diagnosed me as septic, bundled me into his car, and rushed me to the hospital. After several hours of intravenous antibiotics and four liters of fluid, my blood pressure was crashing, a hallmark of sepsis, a potentially fatal condition caused by an exaggerated immune response to injury or infection.

Apple Is Building Something
Bigger Than a TV
CNBC, by Jason Stein    Original Article
Posted By: Calvinesq- 2/19/2013 10:24:31 PM     Post Reply
Given the beating Apple has taken lately—with many questioning its future—it´s important to understand how much television means to Apple. The company´s TV plans are much bigger than just selling iTV sets. [snip] Apple is evolving into an ecosystem, a network that connects to and controls everything from your home to your car to your office. This has the potential to be as impactful as the iPhone and iPad. Today I use iOS apps to control my stereo system (the Sonos) and central air (the Nest).

Woman, 80, knocked off
scooter fighting assailant in
Gloucester City robbery
Philadelphia Inquirer, by Emily Babay    Original Article
Posted By: Calvinesq- 2/19/2013 5:26:06 PM     Post Reply
An 80-year-old woman was knocked off her scooter when she tried to fight off a man robbing her of her purse in Gloucester City. Police allege that 22-year-old John E. Reed approached the woman from behind while she was riding her electric scooter on the 500 block of Cumberland Street at about 11:15 a.m. Sunday. Reed grabbed the woman´s purse and tried to flee, but the woman wouldn´t let go, according to Gloucester City police. He then pushed the woman, knocking her off the scooter, and ran away with the purse.

Congressman says deleted tweets were
to his recently discovered daughter
NBC News, by Luke Russert and Frank Thorp    Original Article
Posted By: Calvinesq- 2/14/2013 11:49:53 PM     Post Reply
Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., tells NBC News that the 24-year-old woman he tweeted at during the State of the Union address was not a romantic interest, but in fact his daughter. After “The Hill” reported that Cohen -- who is not married -- deleted tweets saying “ilu,” short for “I love you,” to Victoria Brink, Cohen claimed that nothing was inappropriate and that the woman was a daughter of an old family friend. That old family friend turned out to be an old girlfriend of Cohen’s and Victoria Brink´s mother. Cohen claimed the reason for tweeting Brink



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

60 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

   

Post Reply   Close thread 704540





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~